MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results

Prostate brachytherapy involves implanting radioactive seeds (I125 for instance) permanently in the gland for the treatment of localized prostate cancers, e.g., cT1c-T2a N0 M0 with good prognostic factors. Treatment planning and seed implanting are most often based on the intensive use of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) imaging. This is not easy because prostate visualization is difficult in this imaging modality particularly as regards the apex of the gland and from an intra- and interobserver variability standpoint. Radioactive seeds are implanted inside open interventional MR machines in some centers. Since MRI was shown to be sensitive and specific for prostate imaging whilst open MR is prohibitive for most centers and makes surgical procedures very complex, this work suggests bringing the MR virtually in the operating room with MRI/TRUS data fusion. This involves providing the physician with bi-modality images (TRUS plus MRI) intended to improve treatment planning from the data registration stage. The paper describes the method developed and implemented in the PROCUR system. Results are reported for a phantom and first series of patients. Phantom experiments helped characterize the accuracy of the process. Patient experiments have shown that using MRI data linked with TRUS data improves TRUS image segmentation especially regarding the apex and base of the prostate. This may significantly modify prostate volume definition and have an impact on treatment planning.

[1]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Real-time magnetic resonance image-guided interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Segmentation of prostate boundaries from ultrasound images using statistical shape model , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  K. Takakura,et al.  Three-dimensional digitizer (neuronavigator): new equipment for computed tomography-guided stereotaxic surgery. , 1987, Surgical neurology.

[4]  K Lam,et al.  Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Ken Masamune,et al.  System for robotically assisted prostate biopsy and therapy with intraoperative CT guidance. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[6]  A. D'Amico,et al.  MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. , 2001, Radiology.

[7]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Matching 3-D anatomical surfaces with non-rigid deformations using octree-splines , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis.

[8]  J. Blasko,et al.  Modern Prostate Brachytherapy , 2002 .

[9]  K. Badani,et al.  Prospective evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor foci in men with prior negative prostastic biopsy: a pilot study. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Patricia Lindsay Modeling uncertainties in the delivery and evaluation of prostate brachytherapy implants , 2004 .

[11]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  D. Gladstone,et al.  Prostate seed implant quality assessment using MR and CT image fusion. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  H Reinhardt,et al.  Computer aided surgery with special focus on neuronavigation. , 1999, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.