Isobaric protein-level labeling strategy for serum glycoprotein quantification analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

While peptide-level labeling using isobaric tag reagents has been widely applied for quantitative proteomics experiments, there are comparatively few reports of protein-level labeling. Intact protein labeling could be broadly applied to quantification experiments utilizing protein-level separations or enrichment schemes. Here, protein-level isobaric labeling was explored as an alternative strategy to peptide-level labeling for serum glycoprotein quantification. Labeling and digestion conditions were optimized by comparing different organic solvents and enzymes. Digestions with Asp-N and trypsin were found highly complementary; combining the results enabled quantification of 30% more proteins than either enzyme alone. Three commercial reagents were compared for protein-level labeling. Protein identification rates were highest with iTRAQ 4-plex when compared to TMT 6-plex and iTRAQ 8-plex using higher-energy collisional dissociation on an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer. The compatibility of isobaric protein-level labeling with lectin-based glycoprotein enrichment was also investigated. More than 74% of lectin-bound labeled proteins were known glycoproteins, which was similar to results from unlabeled and peptide-level labeled serum samples. Finally, protein-level and peptide-level labeling strategies were compared for serum glycoprotein quantification. Isobaric protein-level labeling gave comparable identification levels and quantitative precision to peptide-level labeling.

[1]  H. Fox,et al.  Comparison of 4-plex to 8-plex iTRAQ Quantitative Measurements of Proteins in Human Plasma Samples , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[2]  Rachel M. Adams,et al.  Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[3]  D R Mani,et al.  iTRAQ Labeling is Superior to mTRAQ for Quantitative Global Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[4]  J. Rao,et al.  Quantitative Proteomics Analysis by Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation Identified Lumican as a Potential Marker for Acute Aortic Dissection , 2011, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[5]  J. Timms,et al.  Quantitative profiling of serum samples using TMT protein labelling, fractionation and LC-MS/MS. , 2011, Methods.

[6]  R. Dean,et al.  Direct comparison of stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture and spectral counting for quantitative proteomics. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Peptide Labeling with Isobaric Tags Yields Higher Identification Rates Using iTRAQ 4-Plex Compared to TMT 6-Plex and iTRAQ 8-Plex on LTQ Orbitrap , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  Forest M White,et al.  Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of T cell receptor signaling in diabetes prone and resistant mice. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[9]  A. Thompson,et al.  Comparison of a protein-level and peptide-level labeling strategy for quantitative proteomics of synaptosomes using isobaric tags. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[10]  E. Miyoshi,et al.  Fucosylation and gastrointestinal cancer. , 2010, World journal of hepatology.

[11]  Leonor David,et al.  Alterations in glycosylation as biomarkers for cancer detection , 2010, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[12]  Chen Li,et al.  Identification and confirmation of biomarkers using an integrated platform for quantitative analysis of glycoproteins and their glycosylations. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[13]  Minoru Fujimoto,et al.  iTRAQ-based proteomic identification of leucine-rich α-2 glycoprotein as a novel inflammatory biomarker in autoimmune diseases , 2009, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  Hongying Zhu,et al.  Rapid and label-free detection of breast cancer biomarker CA15-3 in clinical human serum samples with optofluidic ring resonator sensors. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  S. Hanash,et al.  Towards an integrated proteomic and glycomic approach to finding cancer biomarkers , 2009, Genome Medicine.

[16]  M. Mann,et al.  Absolute SILAC for accurate quantitation of proteins in complex mixtures down to the attomole level. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[17]  H. Ryoo,et al.  Identification of putative serum glycoprotein biomarkers for human lung adenocarcinoma by multilectin affinity chromatography and LC‐MS/MS , 2007, Proteomics.

[18]  Kai A. Reidegeld,et al.  Protein labeling by iTRAQ: A new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research , 2007, Proteomics.

[19]  W. Hancock,et al.  Multilectin affinity chromatography for characterization of multiple glycoprotein biomarker candidates in serum from breast cancer patients. , 2006, Clinical chemistry.

[20]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[21]  R Apweiler,et al.  On the frequency of protein glycosylation, as deduced from analysis of the SWISS-PROT database. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.