The Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Programmable Implanted Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems: A 3-Year Prospective Study

BACKGROUND: It is common clinical practice to perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with indwelling programmable intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) systems, although the safety of the procedure has never been documented. We performed a single-center, 3-year, prospective evaluation in patients with a programmable implanted IDD to assess patient discomfort, IDD technical failures, and adverse effects during and after exposure to MRI. METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients with an implanted programmable IDD system (SynchroMed® EL Implantable Infusion Pump, Model 8626L-18, and SynchroMed® II Model 8637-20, 8637-40; Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) requiring a scheduled MRI evaluation were studied during a 3-year period. All MRI scans were performed with a 1.5-tesla clinical use magnet and a specific absorption rate of no more than 0.9 W/kg. Radiograph control was used to confirm postexposure pump rotor movement and detect system dislocations. IDD system failures, patient satisfaction, and discomfort were recorded. RESULTS: None of the patients experienced signs of drug overinfusion that could lead to hemodynamic, respiratory, or neurologic alterations. Radiologic evaluation after MRI revealed no spatial displacements of the intrathecal catheter tip or body pump, and programmer telemetry confirmed the infusion recovery. Patients' satisfaction after the procedure was high. CONCLUSION: Performing an MRI scan with the proposed protocol in patients with an implanted Medtronic programmable IDD system resulted in virtually no technical or medical complications.

[1]  J. Rosenow,et al.  Implantable devices and magnetic resonance imaging: can the two coexist? , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[2]  Terry O Woods,et al.  MR labeling information for implants and devices: explanation of terminology. , 2009, Radiology.

[3]  R. Coffey,et al.  Mortality Associated with Implantation and Management of Intrathecal Opioid Drug Infusion Systems to Treat Noncancer Pain , 2009, Anesthesiology.

[4]  F. Shellock,et al.  Programmable Infusion Pump and Catheter: Evaluation Using 3‐Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[5]  R. Coffey,et al.  Intrathecal baclofen and catheter tip inflammatory mass lesions (granulomas): a reevaluation of case reports and imaging findings in light of experimental, clinicopathological, and radiological evidence. , 2008, Pain medicine.

[6]  K. Burchiel,et al.  DIFFERENTIATING INTRATHECAL CATHETER TIP GRANULOMAS FROM NORMAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGE DISTORTION CAUSED BY METALLIC CATHETER TIPS , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[7]  J. de Andrés,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Spinal Neurostimulation Systems , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[8]  J. Bailes,et al.  A review of intrathecal morphine therapy related granulomas , 2006, European journal of pain.

[9]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Neurostimulation systems: Assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5‐ and 3‐Tesla MR systems , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  F. Shellock,et al.  MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. , 2004, Radiology.

[11]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimeter of MRI‐related implant heating , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Intrathecal opioid treatment for chronic non-malignant pain: a 3-year prospective study , 2004, Pain.

[13]  F G Shellock,et al.  Pre‐MRI Procedure Screening: Recommendations and Safety Considerations for Biomedical Implants and Devices , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  J D Bourland,et al.  Physiologic effects of intense MR imaging gradient fields. , 1999, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[15]  B. Schueler,et al.  MRI compatibility and visibility assessment of implantable medical devices , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  H. Wen,et al.  The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in human cardiac imaging at 1.5, 3, and 4 T. , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[17]  Reinhard Von Roemeling,et al.  MR imaging of patients with implanted drug infusion pumps , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.