Remaining Useful Life Estimation for Predictive Maintenance Using Feature Engineering

Recently, machine learning techniques have been used to produce increasingly effective solutions to predict the remaining useful life (RUL) of assets accurately. This paper investigates the effect of different feature engineering approaches to the accuracy of RUL prediction. In this study, six different feature selection methods and many different regression algorithms were applied to choose the most accurate final model for prediction. Applied feature selection algorithms are Chi Squared, Spearman Correlation, Mutual Information, Fisher Score, Pearson Correlation and Count Based. Machine learning algorithms used in this work are Linear Regression, Bayesian Linear Regression, Poisson Regression, Neural Network Regression, Boosted Decision Tree Regression and Decision Forest Regression. In addition, two different feature engineering approaches were also tested on the benchmark dataset by transforming its feature space, with the goal of improving predictive modelling performance. Each combination of these methods were applied and totally 72 different models were constructed and compared with each other to evaluate their performances in terms of five different metrics, including mean absolute error, root mean squared error, relative absolute error, relative squared error and coefficient of determination.

[1]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Anomaly detection and predictive maintenance for photovoltaic systems , 2018, Neurocomputing.

[2]  Claudio Geisert,et al.  Cluster identification of sensor data for predictive maintenance in a Selective Laser Melting machine tool , 2018 .

[3]  Alexandre César Muniz de Oliveira,et al.  Machine Learning to Estimate the Amount of Training to Learn a Motor Skill , 2019, HCI.

[4]  Ivo Paixao de Medeiros,et al.  Remaining useful life estimation in aeronautics: Combining data-driven and Kalman filtering , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Aditya Sane,et al.  Machine learning for predictive maintenance of industrial machines using IoT sensor data , 2017, 2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS).

[6]  Francisco Javier de Cos Juez,et al.  A hybrid ARIMA-SVM model for the study of the remaining useful life of aircraft engines , 2019, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[7]  Buyue Qian,et al.  Improving rail network velocity: A machine learning approach to predictive maintenance , 2014 .

[8]  Muhammad Qaiser Saleem,et al.  Vehicle Remote Health Monitoring and Prognostic Maintenance System , 2018 .

[9]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[10]  Houxiang Zhang,et al.  Remaining useful life predictions for turbofan engine degradation using semi-supervised deep architecture , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  David Scott,et al.  Overview of maintenance strategy, acceptable maintenance standard and resources from a building maintenance operation perspective , 2009 .

[12]  Gian Antonio Susto,et al.  Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance: A Multiple Classifier Approach , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[13]  Shulin Wang,et al.  Feature selection in machine learning: A new perspective , 2018, Neurocomputing.

[14]  Chetan Gupta,et al.  Long Short-Term Memory Network for Remaining Useful Life estimation , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM).

[15]  Kai Sun,et al.  Predictive Maintenance of Power Substation Equipment by Infrared Thermography Using a Machine-Learning Approach , 2017 .

[16]  Xiang Li,et al.  Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..