Relationship Between Manometric and Videofluoroscopic Measures of Swallow Function in Healthy Adults and Patients Treated for Head and Neck Cancer with Various Modalities

Pharyngeal manometry complements the modified barium swallow with videofluoroscopy (VFS) in diagnosing pressure-related causes of dysphagia. When manometric analysis is not feasible, it would be ideal if pressure information about the swallow could be inferred accurately from the VFS evaluation. Swallowing function was examined using VFS and concurrent manometry in 18 subjects (11 head and neck patients treated with various modalities and 7 healthy adults). Nonparametric univariate and multivariate analyses revealed significant relationships between manometric and fluoroscopic variables. Increases in pressure wave amplitude were significantly correlated with increased duration of tongue base to pharyngeal wall contact, reduced bolus transit times, and oropharyngeal residue. Pharyngeal residue was the most important VFS variable in reflecting pharyngeal pressure measurements. Certain VFS measures were significantly correlated with measures of pressure assessed with manometry. Further research is needed before observations and measures from VFS alone may be deemed sufficient for determining pressure-generation difficulties during the swallow in patients who are unable or unwilling to submit to manometric testing.

[1]  D. McGuire,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cancer therapy–induced oral and gastrointestinal mucositis , 2004, Cancer.

[2]  O. Ekberg,et al.  Solid-state computerized manometry improves diagnostic yield in pharyngeal dysphagia: simultaneous videoradiography and manometry in dysphagia patients with normal barium swallows , 1995, Abdominal Imaging.

[3]  C. Dalton,et al.  Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in humans. , 1990, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  P J Kahrilas,et al.  Pharyngeal clearance during swallowing: a combined manometric and videofluoroscopic study. , 1992, Gastroenterology.

[5]  P. Belafsky,et al.  Relationship between Fluoroscopic and Manometric Measures of Pharyngeal Constriction: The Pharyngeal Constriction Ratio , 2006, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[6]  P J Kahrilas,et al.  AGA technical review on management of oropharyngeal dysphagia. , 1999, Gastroenterology.

[7]  I. Cook,et al.  Predictors of Outcome following Cricopharyngeal Disruption for Pharyngeal Dysphagia , 1997, Dysphagia.

[8]  D. McGuire,et al.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Mucositis , 2007 .

[9]  I. Cook Cricopharyngeal function and dysfunction , 1993, Dysphagia.

[10]  P. Kahrilas,et al.  Interpretation of pharyngeal manometric recordings: Limitations and variability , 1993 .

[11]  M. Stark,et al.  Manometry of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx is not useful in unselected patients referred for esophageal testing , 2000, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[12]  E. Dejaeger,et al.  Mechanisms Involved in Postdeglutition Retention in the Elderly , 1997, Dysphagia.

[13]  J. Mayberry,et al.  Achalasia: a critical review of epidemiological studies , 1998, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[14]  I. Cook,et al.  Mechanisms of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia in patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1996, Gastroenterology.

[15]  P J Kahrilas,et al.  Upper esophageal sphincter opening and modulation during swallowing. , 1989, Gastroenterology.

[16]  A. Hila,et al.  Pharyngeal and Upper Esophageal Sphincter Manometry in the Evaluation of Dysphagia , 2001, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.