A Cross-Layer Approach for Prioritized Frame Transmissions of MPEG-4 Over the IEEE 802 . 11 and IEEE 802 . 11 e Wireless Local Area Networks

In this paper, we study MPEG-4 transmissions over the IEEE 802.11 wireless local area networks (WLANs). First, we provide a simulation of MPEG-4 using OPNET over the WLANs in terms of throughput, impacts of multiple MPEG-4 streams, and compression rate on throughput. Our simulation results show that a higher throughput does not always yield a better quality MPEG-4 video. We further observe that if an I frame of MPEG4 video is lost, the next N−1 frames (all P and B frames) are useless [where N is the total number of frames contained within one group of picture (GoP)]. Furthermore, we observe that the I, P, and B frames are in decreasing order of importance. Therefore, we propose a cross-layer approach to improve MPEG-4 transmissions over WLANs. In the proposed approach: 1) P and B frames will be discarded by the MPEG-4 decoder at the receiver’s medium access control (MAC) layer if the corresponding I fame is lost; 2) the individual MPEG-4 frames are prioritized at the MAC layer so that I frames have a higher priority than P frames, which have a higher priority than the B frames; 3) each frame (I, B, P) has a time deadline field so that if the deadline cannot be reached, the frame and other related P and B frames in the same GoP are deleted without further transmissions/re-transmissions; and 4) if the delay between an I frame and the next P frame is too long, then it may be better to drop the least important B frames in an attempt to allow the video to catch up. Finally, we study MPEG-4 transmissions over the IEEE 802.11e WLANs, and we adopt a measurement admission control scheme for IEEE 802.11e. Our results show the advantages of the proposed scheme.

[1]  Yao Wang,et al.  Video Processing and Communications , 2001 .

[2]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Cross-layer design in 4G wireless terminals , 2004, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[3]  Ming-Ting Sun,et al.  Compressed Video Over Networks , 2000 .

[4]  Taesoo Kwon,et al.  Design and implementation of a simulator based on a cross-layer protocol between MAC and PHY layers in a WiBro Compatible.IEEE 802.16e OFDMA system , 2005, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[5]  R. Srikant,et al.  A tutorial on cross-layer optimization in wireless networks , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Fotis Foukalas,et al.  Cross-layer design proposals for wireless mobile networks: a survey and taxonomy , 2008, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  Jordi Pérez-Romero,et al.  Cross-layer scheduling strategy for UMTS downlink enhancement , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Weihua Zhuang,et al.  Cross-layer design for resource allocation in 3G wireless networks and beyond , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Vipul Gupta,et al.  Freeze-TCP: a true end-to-end TCP enhancement mechanism for mobile environments , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[10]  Yang Xiao,et al.  IEEE 802.11e: QoS provisioning at the MAC layer , 2004, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[11]  Sunghyun Choi,et al.  Two-level protection and guarantee for multimedia traffic in IEEE 802.11e distributed WLANs , 2009, Wirel. Networks.

[12]  Tarek Saadawi Optimizing Airborne Networking Performance with Cross-Layer Design Approach , 2009 .

[13]  Sridhar Iyer,et al.  Cross-layer feedback architecture for mobile device protocol stacks , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Sunghyun Choi,et al.  Protection and guarantee for voice and video traffic in IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.