The Intellectual Structure of Product Innovation Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1984–2004

Product innovation research has matured substantially in the last two decades. A great deal of knowledge has been produced on various aspects of the discipline, so it is of interest to assess the state of the art the scientific community has reached in this discipline, and the route it has taken. This perspective is investigated through a bibliometric study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management (JPIM), arguably the most important specialized journal on this topic. The work reviews all journal article contributions in JPIM from 1984-2004 in determined time frames, assesses the citations contained in these articles, identifies how the citations are related to the various topics of production innovation research (topic-related citation variety, topic-related citation consistency, variation in topic-related citation pattern) and offers a retrospective examination of the evolution of the field. The overall analysis of citations shows that most articles in JPIM cite at least one of the Top 50 works identified by this study. This testifies the strong impact of the most influential works on the intellectual structure of product innovation research. The observed citation pattern suggests that the Top 50 articles gained influence in product innovation research either because they represent a relevant contribution on a fundamental topic that already has been authoritatively studied or because they investigate in a relevant manner a new topic. The article suggests that JPIM might benefit in its aim to consolidate its position as one of the top academic business journals if published articles increasingly drew on the most influential works to inform their research design, and explicitly stated the theoretical underpinnings they draw on in their research design. Overall, the analysis of the sub-periods (1984-1988, 1989-1993, 1994-1998, and 1999-2004) provides evidence for the maturation of new product innovation research. Books covering a wide range of topics are replaced by journal articles addressing a specific topic; over time, specific topics emerge and become influential for the discipline’s intellectual structure; articles published in JPIM augment their methodological rigor and increasingly address contingency factors. The article also notes that obtaining relevance for JPIM authors constitutes a necessary condition for being considered by management researchers at large as an influential contribution to product innovation research.

[1]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[2]  R. Merton,et al.  Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system , 1971 .

[3]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Positions in Multiple Network Systems, Part One: A General Conception of Stratification and Prestige in a System of Actors Cast as a Social Topology , 1977 .

[4]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[5]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal Publication in Three Scientific Disciplines , 1977 .

[6]  A. Goldman Publishing Activity in Marketing as an Indicator of Its Structure and Disciplinary Boundaries , 1979 .

[7]  Richard Blackburn,et al.  Citation analysis in the organizational sciences. , 1981 .

[8]  John B. Miner,et al.  The Validity and Usefulness of Theories in an Emerging Organizational Science , 1984 .

[9]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  Mapping the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980-1985: A Co-Citation Analysis , 1987, MIS Q..

[10]  R. Rodgers,et al.  Causal models of publishing productivity in psychology. , 1989 .

[11]  S. M. Leong A Citation Analysis of the Journal of Consumer Research , 1989 .

[12]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Intellectual Structure of Research in Organizational Behavior, 1972-1984: A Cocitation Analysis. , 1990 .

[13]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Assessing the Influence of Journal of Consumer Research: A Citation Analysis , 1991 .

[14]  M. Holbrook,et al.  The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Study of Author Cocitations in the First 15 Years of the Journal of Consumer Research , 1993 .

[15]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[16]  Y. Pasadeos,et al.  Organizational Analysis in North America and Europe: A Comparison of Co-citation Networks , 1995 .

[17]  Danny Miller,et al.  Creative Chaos versus Munificent Momentum , 1997 .

[18]  J. Phelps,et al.  Disciplinary Impact of Advertising Scholars: Temporal Comparisons of Influential Authors, Works and Research Networks , 1998 .

[19]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 , 1998 .

[20]  A. Tahai,et al.  A revealed preference study of management journals' direct influences , 1999 .

[21]  A. Pilkington,et al.  Is Production and Operations Management a Discipline?: A citation/co-citation Study , 1999 .

[22]  R. Daft,et al.  Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics , 2001 .

[23]  M. Helm In search of diversity , 2002 .

[24]  R. Pieters,et al.  The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and its Subareas over Time , 2003 .

[25]  A. Ramos-Rodríguez,et al.  Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000 , 2004 .

[26]  Steven W. Floyd,et al.  Are managers from Mars and academicians from venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance , 2004 .

[27]  J. Linton,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Ranking the Technology Innovation Management Journals* , 2004 .

[28]  Sara L. Rynes,et al.  From the Editors Taking Stock and Looking Ahead , 2005 .

[29]  F. Vermeulen On Rigor and Relevance: Fostering Dialectic Progress in Management Research , 2005 .

[30]  Brian K. Boyd,et al.  How advanced is the strategy paradigm? The role of particularism and universalism in shaping research outcomes , 2005 .

[31]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s , 2005 .

[32]  Stephen R. Barley,et al.  When I Write My Masterpiece: Thoughts On What Makes A Paper Interesting , 2006 .

[33]  P. Verhoef,et al.  The Quest for Citations: Drivers of Article Impact , 2006 .

[34]  Robert P. Gephart,et al.  Ethnostatistics and Organizational Research Methodologies , 2006 .

[35]  S. Rynes,et al.  What Makes Management Research Interesting, And Why Does It Matter? , 2006 .

[36]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[37]  J. Thieme PERSPECTIVE: The World's Top Innovation Management Scholars and Their Social Capital* , 2007 .

[38]  A. Griffin,et al.  Twenty Years of the Journal of Product Innovation Management: History, Participants, and Knowledge Stock and Flows , 2007 .