Nigel Lawson's tent: Discourse analysis, attribution theory and the social psychology of fact

The general aim of this paper is to show some of the limitations of the attribution theory approach to ordinary reasoning when compared to a discourse analytic alternative. Three central shortcomings with attribution theory are documented, each stemming from the method of presenting subjects with factual vignettes from which they are required to draw inferences: (a) its asocial and unexplicated notion of information; (b) its realist view of linguistic description; (c) its constrained account of participants' activity. These paws are illustrated in practice through a discourse analytic study of the management of factual versions in a political dispute (over a controversial briefing between a British politician, Nigel Lawson, and a group of journalists). Specifically, it focuses on ‘consensus information’, examining the way notions of consensus are used when warranting and undermining versions. Two features of consensus accounts are examined: (a) consensus across a group of observers of an event; (b) corroboration between independent individuals. In each case, the rhetorical organization of factual accounts is documented by analysing both the way the consensus is constructed and the way it is undermined or discounted. The analysis explores how the ‘facts of the matter’, rather than existing as criteria for the resolution of disputation, were themselves part and parcel of the disputation itself: In attribution theory terms, the clear distinction between ‘consensus information’ and the attributions which flow from it becomes unworkable. It is suggested that the analysis provides an exemplar for a discourse orientated social psychology of fact.

[1]  E. Schegloff.  Description in the Social Sciences I: Talk-in-Interaction , 1988 .

[2]  Events explained in conversational ‘because’ statements , 1987 .

[3]  J. Searle.  Intentionality: Name index , 1983 .

[4]  S. Yearley.  The relationship between epistemological and sociological cognitive interests: Some ambiguities underlying the use of interest theory in the study of scientific knowledge , 1982 .

[5]  D. Hilton,et al.  Knowledge-Based Causal Attribution: The Abnormal Conditions Focus Model , 1986 .

[6]  C. Antaki.  Ordinary explanation in conversation: Causal structures and their defence , 1985 .

[7]  M. Mulkay,et al.  Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse , 1984 .

[8]  A gloss on attribution theory , 1980 .

[9]  Michael Billig,et al.  Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology , 1987 .

[10]  S. Yearley.  Demotic logic: Causal discourse and the structure of explanations , 1987 .

[11]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims , 1986, Asking and Telling in Conversation.

[12]  Shlomith Rimmon-Kenan.  Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics , 1983 .

[13]  D. Forsyth.  The functions of attributions. , 1980 .

[14]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Reconstructing context: The conventionalization of classroom knowledge , 1989 .

[15]  S. Yearley,et al.  Proofs and Reputations: Sir James Hall and the Use of Classification Devices in Scientific Argument , 1984 .

[16]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Research Act , 1978 .

[17]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[18]  John Heritage,et al.  Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response at Party Political Conferences , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  S. Condor.  ‘Race stereotypes’ and racist discourse , 1988 .

[20]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[21]  J. Potter,et al.  Some problems underlying the theory of social representations , 1985 .

[22]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  Attribution Theory: Social and Functional Extensions , 1984 .

[23]  L. A. McArthur.  The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. , 1972 .

[24]  Michael Billig,et al.  Prejudice, categorization and particularization: from a perceptual to a rhetorical approach , 1985 .

[25]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[26]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[27]  Margaret Wetherell,et al.  Accomplishing attitudes: Fact and evaluation in racist discourse , 1988 .

[28]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[29]  D. Smith.  No one commits suicide: Textual analysis of ideological practices , 1983 .

[30]  J. M. Atkinson.  Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[31]  M. Wowk,et al.  Blame allocation, sex and gender in a murder interrogation , 1984 .

[32]  Anita M. Pomerantz,et al.  Telling My Side: “Limited Access’ as a “Fishing” Device , 1980 .

[33]  Jeff Coulter,et al.  The social construction of mind , 1979 .

[34]  S. Woolgar,et al.  Introduction: Sociological orientations to representational practice in science , 1988 .

[35]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Accounting for Error: How Scientists Construct their Social World when they Account for Correct and Incorrect Belief , 1982 .

[36]  J. Thompson.  Studies in the theory of ideology , 1987 .

[37]  Michael Billig,et al.  Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking , 1988 .

[38]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Constructing skepticism: Four devices used to engender the audience's skepticism , 1988 .

[39]  Wendy Hollway,et al.  Subjectivity and Method in Psychology: Gender, Meaning and Science , 1989 .

[40]  R. H. Smith,et al.  Knowledge-based information acquisition: norms and the functions of consensus information. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Frank D. Fincham,et al.  The role of attributions in the development of dating relationships. , 1987 .

[42]  D. Hilton.  Conversational processes and causal explanation. , 1990 .

[43]  J. Searle.  Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind , 1983 .

[44]  Billig.  Ideology and Social Psychology , 1982 .

[45]  J. Harvey,et al.  Current issues in attribution theory and research. , 1984, Annual review of psychology.

[46]  J. Sabini,et al.  Baseball and hot sauce: A critique of some attributional treatments of evaluation , 1980 .

[47]  Steven Yearley,et al.  Textual Persuasion: The Role of Social Accounting in the Construction of Scientific Arguments , 1981 .

[48]  Michael Mulkay,et al.  Scientists' theory talk , 1983 .

[49]  Margaret Wetherell,et al.  Unequal egalitarianism: A preliminary study of discourses concerning gender and employment opportunities , 1987 .

[50]  Derek Edwards,et al.  Joint remembering: Constructing an account of shared experience through conversational discourse , 1986 .

[51]  Michael Billig.  Psychology, rhetoric, and cognition , 1989 .

[52]  J. Potter,et al.  Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1987 .

[53]  A. Buss,et al.  Causes and reasons in attribution theory: A conceptual critique. , 1978 .

[54]  B. Weiner,et al.  Spontaneous" causal thinking. , 1985 .

[55]  D. Smith.  `K is Mentally Ill' the Anatomy of a Factual Account , 1978 .

[56]  M. Billig.  The argumentative nature of holding strong views: a case study , 1989 .

[57]  Michael Mulkay,et al.  The Word and the World: Explorations in the Form of Sociological Analysis , 1985 .

[58]  S. Widdicombe,et al.  'Being' Versus 'Doing' Punk: On Achieving Authenticity as a Member , 1990 .