Radial chromatin positioning is shaped by local gene density, not by gene expression

G- and R-bands of metaphase chromosomes are characterized by profound differences in gene density, CG content, replication timing, and chromatin compaction. The preferential localization of gene-dense, transcriptionally active, and early replicating chromatin in the nuclear interior and of gene-poor, later replicating chromatin at the nuclear envelope has been demonstrated to be evolutionary-conserved in various cell types. Yet, the impact of different local chromatin features on the radial nuclear arrangement of chromatin is still not well understood. In particular, it is not known whether radial chromatin positioning is preferentially shaped by local gene density per se or by other related parameters such as replication timing or transcriptional activity. The interdependence of these distinct chromatin features on the linear deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence precludes a simple dissection of these parameters with respect to their importance for the reorganization of the linear DNA organization into the distinct radial chromatin arrangements observed in the nuclear space. To analyze this problem, we generated probe sets of pooled bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones from HSA 11, 12, 18, and 19 representing R/G-band-assigned chromatin, segments with different gene density and gene loci with different expression levels. Using multicolor 3D flourescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and 3D image analysis, we determined their localization in the nucleus and their positions within or outside the corresponding chromosome territory (CT). For each BAC data on local gene density within 2- and 10-Mb windows, as well as GC (guanine and cytosine) content, replication timing and expression levels were determined. A correlation analysis of these parameters with nuclear positioning revealed regional gene density as the decisive parameter determining the radial positioning of chromatin in the nucleus in contrast to band assignment, replication timing, and transcriptional activity. We demonstrate a polarized distribution of gene-dense vs gene-poor chromatin within CTs with respect to the nuclear border. Whereas we confirm previous reports that a particular gene-dense and transcriptionally highly active region of about 2 Mb on 11p15.5 often loops out from the territory surface, gene-dense and highly expressed sequences were not generally found preferentially at the CT surface as previously suggested.

[1]  Laurence D. Hurst,et al.  The evolution of isochores , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Re-modelling of nuclear architecture in quiescent and senescent human fibroblasts , 2000, Current Biology.

[3]  Nick Gilbert,et al.  Chromatin Architecture of the Human Genome Gene-Rich Domains Are Enriched in Open Chromatin Fibers , 2004, Cell.

[4]  Owen T McCann,et al.  Replication timing of the human genome. , 2004, Human molecular genetics.

[5]  K. Sandhu,et al.  Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Pierre Chartrand,et al.  Genome-wide scanning of HoxB1-associated loci in mouse ES cells using an open-ended Chromosome Conformation Capture methodology , 2006, Chromosome Research.

[7]  T. Cremer,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved, cell type and species-specific higher order chromatin arrangements in interphase nuclei of primates , 2007, Chromosoma.

[8]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Higher order chromatin architecture in the cell nucleus: on the way from structure to function , 2004, Biology of the cell.

[9]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. , 2002 .

[10]  Ruth R. E. Williams.  Transcription and the territory: the ins and outs of gene positioning. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[11]  David Beare,et al.  Erratum: Replication timing of the human genome (Human Molecular Genetics) (2004) vol. 13 (191-202)) , 2004 .

[12]  U. Claussen.  Chromosomics , 2005, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[13]  Giorgio Bernardi,et al.  Gene-rich and gene-poor chromosomal regions have different locations in the interphase nuclei of cold-blooded vertebrates , 2006, Chromosoma.

[14]  Helen A. Foster,et al.  The genome and the nucleus: a marriage made by evolution , 2005, Chromosoma.

[15]  T. Misteli,et al.  Spatial genome organization. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[16]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Spatial Positioning A New Dimension in Genome Function , 2004, Cell.

[17]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  Nuclear re-organisation of the Hoxb complex during mouse embryonic development , 2005, Development.

[18]  J. Mcneil,et al.  The X chromosome is organized into a gene-rich outer rim and an internal core containing silenced nongenic sequences , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Juliet A. Ellis,et al.  The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[20]  Nick Gilbert,et al.  The role of chromatin structure in regulating the expression of clustered genes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[21]  H. Bussemaker,et al.  The human transcriptome map reveals extremes in gene density, intron length, GC content, and repeat pattern for domains of highly and weakly expressed genes. , 2003, Genome research.

[22]  T. Cremer,et al.  Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[23]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[24]  T. Liehr,et al.  The DNA-based structure of human chromosome 5 in interphase. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[25]  Veronica J. Buckle,et al.  Coregulated human globin genes are frequently in spatial proximity when active , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Genes and genomes: chromosome bands – flavours to savour , 1993 .

[27]  Alexander E Vinogradov,et al.  DNA helix: the importance of being AT-rich , 2017, Mammalian Genome.

[28]  R. Flavell,et al.  Interchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci , 2005, Nature.

[29]  David Haussler,et al.  Integration of the cytogenetic map with the draft human genome sequence. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[30]  R. van Driel,et al.  The eukaryotic genome: a system regulated at different hierarchical levels , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[31]  D. Haussler,et al.  Ultraconserved Elements in the Human Genome , 2004, Science.

[32]  Joseph Rosenecker,et al.  Transcription-dependent spatial arrangements of CFTR and adjacent genes in human cell nuclei , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  I. Dunham,et al.  DNA sequence and analysis of human chromosome 9 , 2003, Nature.

[34]  M. Kozubek,et al.  The 3D structure of human chromosomes in cell nuclei , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[35]  T. Cremer,et al.  Replication labeling patterns and chromosome territories typical of mammalian nuclei are conserved in the early metazoan Hydra , 2003, Chromosoma.

[36]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Chromosome bands--flavours to savour. , 1993, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[37]  Andrew S. Belmont,et al.  Interphase movements of a DNA chromosome region modulated by VP16 transcriptional activator , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[38]  Mark Groudine,et al.  Form follows function: The genomic organization of cellular differentiation. , 2004, Genes & development.

[39]  B. Steensel,et al.  Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture–on-chip (4C) , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[40]  T. Cremer,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  DNA replication-timing analysis of human chromosome 22 at high resolution and different developmental states. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Long-Range Directional Movement of an Interphase Chromosome Site , 2006, Current Biology.

[43]  N. Maraldi,et al.  Laminopathies: Involvement of structural nuclear proteins in the pathogenesis of an increasing number of human diseases , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[44]  Nigel P. Carter,et al.  Accurate and reliable high-throughput detection of copy number variation in the human genome. , 2006, Genome research.

[45]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Rise, fall and resurrection of chromosome territories: a historical perspective. Part I. The rise of chromosome territories. , 2006, European journal of histochemistry : EJH.

[46]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Clusters of co-expressed genes in mammalian genomes are conserved by natural selection. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[47]  Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome , 2002, Nature.

[48]  Peter Teague,et al.  Differences in the Localization and Morphology of Chromosomes in the Human Nucleus , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[49]  Cameron S. Osborne,et al.  Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[50]  D. Zink.  The temporal program of DNA replication: new insights into old questions , 2006, Chromosoma.

[51]  J. Ragoussis,et al.  Large-scale chromatin organization of the major histocompatibility complex and other regions of human chromosome 6 and its response to interferon in interphase nuclei. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[52]  R Eils,et al.  The 3D positioning of ANT2 and ANT3 genes within female X chromosome territories correlates with gene activity. , 1999, Experimental cell research.

[53]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  Chromatin organization in the mammalian nucleus. , 2005, International review of cytology.

[54]  J. Mcneil,et al.  Clustering of multiple specific genes and gene-rich R-bands around SC-35 domains , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[55]  R. Eils,et al.  Three-Dimensional Maps of All Chromosomes in Human Male Fibroblast Nuclei and Prometaphase Rosettes , 2005, PLoS biology.

[56]  G. Holmquist,et al.  Characterization of Giemsa dark- and light-band DNA , 1982, Cell.

[57]  A Benner,et al.  Active and inactive genes localize preferentially in the periphery of chromosome territories , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[58]  Wendy A. Bickmore,et al.  Gene density and transcription influence the localization of chromatin outside of chromosome territories detectable by FISH , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[59]  Katherine L. Wilson,et al.  The nuclear lamina comes of age , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[60]  Roland Eils,et al.  Topology of genes and nontranscribed sequences in human interphase nuclei. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[61]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription. , 2004, Genes & development.

[62]  H Stein,et al.  Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. , 1984, Journal of immunology.

[63]  H. Fritsch.  Accurate and reliable , 1992 .

[64]  Sinead B. O'Leary,et al.  DNA sequence and analysis of human chromosome 18 , 2005, Nature.

[65]  Giorgio Bernardi,et al.  Localization of the gene-richest and the gene-poorest isochores in the interphase nuclei of mammals and birds. , 2002, Gene.

[66]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[67]  U. Francke.  Digitized and differentially shaded human chromosome ideograms for genomic applications. , 1994, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[68]  T. Pederson.  The spatial organization of the genome in mammalian cells. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[69]  N. Carter,et al.  DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP‐PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones , 2003, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[70]  Roland Eils,et al.  Local gene density predicts the spatial position of genetic loci in the interphase nucleus. , 2005, Experimental cell research.

[71]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Metaphase chromosome structure: Bands arise from a differential folding path of the highly AT-rich scaffold , 1994, Cell.

[72]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories--a functional nuclear landscape. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[73]  Stanislav Kozubek,et al.  Nuclear architecture in the light of gene expression and cell differentiation studies , 2006, Biology of the cell.

[74]  T. Cremer,et al.  Exploiting nuclear duality of ciliates to analyse topological requirements for DNA replication and transcription , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[75]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Nuclear Organization of Mammalian Genomes , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[76]  Terrence S. Furey,et al.  The DNA sequence and biology of human chromosome 19 , 2004, Nature.

[77]  M. Kozubek,et al.  Topography of genetic loci in the nuclei of cells of colorectal carcinoma and adjacent tissue of colonic epithelium , 2004, Chromosoma.

[78]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[79]  S. Kosak,et al.  A genetic analysis of chromosome territory looping: diverse roles for distal regulatory elements , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[80]  F. Baas,et al.  The Human Transcriptome Map: Clustering of Highly Expressed Genes in Chromosomal Domains , 2001, Science.

[81]  T. Cremer,et al.  Inheritance of gene density–related higher order chromatin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nuclei , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[82]  Carol J. Bult,et al.  Folding and organization of a contiguous chromosome region according to the gene distribution pattern in primary genomic sequence , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[83]  J. Ragoussis,et al.  Subchromosomal positioning of the epidermal differentiation complex (EDC) in keratinocyte and lymphoblast interphase nuclei. , 2002, Experimental cell research.