A Theory of Central Auditory Masking and Its Partial Validation

A quantitative psychophysiological theory of central masking is developed and partially validated by means of psychophysiological comparisons. The theory assumes constant signal‐to‐noise ratio in the physiological domain for constant signal detectability, partial linear summation of dichotic inputs, and a direct proportionality between driven neural activity and sound intensity at near‐threshold intensities. All assumptions are based on psychophysical and physiological evidence independent of central masking. The theory is shown to predict accurately single‐unit characteristics of the auditory nerve and of primary‐like populations in the cochlear nuclei and the superior olive. Validating comparisons between calculated and empirical results are made in time, frequency, and intensity domains, for steady‐state and transient stimuli.

[1]  E. J. Kletsky,et al.  Intensity Characteristics of Mechanoreceptors , 1970 .

[2]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The Masking of Pure Tones and of Speech by White Noise , 1950 .

[3]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Temporal Position of Discharges in Single Auditory Nerve Fibers within the Cycle of a Sine‐Wave Stimulus: Frequency and Intensity Effects , 1971 .

[4]  S. S. Stevens Neural events and the psychophysical law. , 1970, Science.

[5]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Frequency distribution of central masking. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  On Central Masking and a Time Constant of the Auditory System , 1967 .

[7]  G. Moushegian,et al.  Neuronal response correlates of cochlear nucleus: evidence for restrictive and multiple parameter information transfer. , 1970, Experimental neurology.

[8]  J. Boudreau,et al.  STIMULUS CORRELATES OF WAVE ACTIVITY IN THE SUPERIOR-OLIVARY COMPLEX OF THE CAT. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  B. Scharf,et al.  Dichotic summation of loudness. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  I. Whitfield Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve , 1966 .

[11]  J. Boudreau,et al.  Cat superior olive S-segment cell discharge to tonal stimulation. , 1970, Contributions to Sensory Physiology.

[12]  B. Katz,et al.  Depolarization of sensory terminals and the initiation of impulses in the muscle spindle , 1950, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Observations on a single auditory nerve fiber over a six-week period. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  R. L. Wegel,et al.  The Auditory Masking of One Pure Tone by Another and its Probable Relation to the Dynamics of the Inner Ear , 1924 .

[15]  M. Rowe,et al.  "Tactile" Stimulus Intensity: Information Transmission by Relay Neurons in Different Trigeminal Nuclei , 1968, Science.

[16]  C Tsuchitani,et al.  Stimulus level of dichotically presented tones and cat superior olive S-segment cell dcharge. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Analysis of Some Auditory Characteristics. , 1963 .

[18]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Zwislocki Theory of Temporal Auditory Summation , 1960 .

[20]  J. Zwislocki Temporal summation of loudness: an analysis. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  S. S. Stevens The Measurement of Loudness , 1955 .