Predicting therapy success for treatment as usual and blended treatment in the domain of depression

In this paper, we explore the potential of predicting therapy success for patients in mental health care. Such predictions can eventually improve the process of matching effective therapy types to individuals. In the EU project E-COMPARED, a variety of information is gathered about patients suffering from depression. We use this data, where 276 patients received treatment as usual and 227 received blended treatment, to investigate to what extent we are able to predict therapy success. We utilize different encoding strategies for preprocessing, varying feature selection techniques, and different statistical procedures for this purpose. Significant predictive power is found with average AUC values up to 0.7628 for treatment as usual and 0.7765 for blended treatment. Adding daily assessment data for blended treatment does currently not add predictive accuracy. Cost effectiveness analysis is needed to determine the added potential for real-world applications.

[1]  M H Trivedi,et al.  The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS-SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: a psychometric evaluation , 2004, Psychological Medicine.

[2]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[3]  Amy L. Stevens,et al.  Examining Change in Therapeutic Alliance to Predict Youth Mental Health Outcomes , 2015, Journal of emotional and behavioral disorders.

[4]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[5]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9 , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[7]  Gerhard Tutz,et al.  Boosting ridge regression , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[8]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[9]  D. Sheehan,et al.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. , 1998, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[10]  Max Kuhn,et al.  caret: Classification and Regression Training , 2015 .

[11]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  Design and Analysis of an Ambient Intelligent System Supporting Depression Therapy , 2009, HEALTHINF.

[12]  S. Gilbody,et al.  Defining successful treatment outcome in depression using the PHQ-9: a comparison of methods. , 2010, Journal of affective disorders.

[13]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Ecological momentary assessment. , 2008, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  Leif E. Peterson K-nearest neighbor , 2009, Scholarpedia.

[16]  M. Hardy Regression with dummy variables , 1993 .

[17]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.