The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses.

Two split-brain patients, a patient with callosal agenesis, and 6 age-matched control participants were tested on a bimanual force production task. The participants produced isometric responses with their index fingers, attempting to match the target force specified by a visual stimulus. On unimanual trials, the stimuli were presented in either the left or right visual field and the response was made with the ipsilateral hand. On bimanual trials, two stimuli were presented, one on each side, and the target forces could be either identical or different. Bimanual responses of the control subjects showed strong evidence of coupling. Forces produced by one hand were influenced by the forces produced by the other hand with positive correlations observed for all target force combinations. These assimilation effects and correlations were greatly attenuated in the acallosal group, with similar results observed for the split-brain patients and participant with callosal agenesis. Furthermore, the processes involved in selecting and planning the two responses occurred independently in the acallosal group; in contrast to the controls, the three acallosal participants exhibited no differences in reaction times or accuracy between bimanual trials in which the two target forces were the same or different. We also found a striking temporal desynchronization of the responses in the split-brain patients, indicating that in this context, temporal coupling is impaired after callosotomy. These results are congruent with the hypothesis that interference related to response selection and planning of bimanual force pulses arises from callosal interactions.

[1]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Bimanual interference associated with the selection of target locations. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Carol A. Putnam,et al.  On the Space-Time Structure of Human Interlimb Co-Ordination , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  Mario Wiesendanger,et al.  Dissociation of grip/load-force coupling during a bimanual manipulative assignment , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Bimanual coupling during the specification of isometric forces , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  E. Evarts,et al.  Motor Cortex control of finely graded forces. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Dissociation of Spatial and Temporal Coupling in the Bimanual Movements of Callosotomy Patients , 1996 .

[7]  M S Gazzaniga,et al.  Anterior and posterior callosal contributions to simultaneous bimanual movements of the hands and fingers. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. , 1988, Psychological review.

[9]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[10]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Direction information coordinated via the posterior third of the corpus callosum during bimanual movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  D Goodman,et al.  On the coordination of two-handed movements. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  R. Ivry,et al.  Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters , 2003, Psychological research.

[13]  J. Kelso,et al.  Environmentally-specified patterns of movement coordination in normal and split-brain subjects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  J. Flanagan,et al.  The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Daniel Cattaert,et al.  Hand coordination in bimanual circle drawing. , 1995 .

[16]  Paul M. Corballis,et al.  MRI assessment of spared fibers following callosotomy: A second look , 2001 .

[17]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: uncoupling of lateralized response codes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  On the relations between single cell activity in the motor cortex and the direction and magnitude of three-dimensional static isometric force , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  M. Hallett,et al.  Congenital mirror movements. Abnormal organization of motor pathways in two patients. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  Bimanual Movement Control: Information processing and Interaction Effects , 1984 .

[21]  C. Erkelens,et al.  A comparison of curvatures of left and right hand movements in a simple pointing task , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  A M Wing,et al.  Brief bimanual force pulses: correlations between the hands in force and time. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  S. Cardoso de Oliveira.  The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Subcortical locus of temporal coupling in the bimanual movements of a callosotomy patient , 1999 .

[25]  J. Ashe.  Force and the motor cortex , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  A study of a bimanual synergy associated with holding an object , 1998 .

[27]  K. Newell,et al.  Noise, information transmission, and force variability. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  W Spijkers,et al.  Specification of movement amplitudes for the left and right hands: evidence for transient parametric coupling from overlapping-task performance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  D Timmann,et al.  Disorders in Timing and Force of Finger Opening in Overarm Throws Made by Cerebellar Subjects , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[30]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination , 2001, Nature.

[31]  Daniel Cattaert,et al.  Simulating a neural cross-talk model for between-hand interference during bimanual circle drawing , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  J. Ashe.  Erratum to “Force and the motor cortex” [Behavioural Brain Research 86 (1997) 1–15] 1 PII of original article: S0166-4328(96)00145-3 1 , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  The motor cortex and the coding of force. , 1992, Science.

[34]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: specification interference as revealed by reaction time , 1997 .

[35]  R. Schmidt,et al.  The relationship between force and force variability in minimal and near-maximal static and dynamic contractions. , 1980, Journal of motor behavior.

[36]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Static and Phasic Cross-Talk Effects in Discrete Bimanual Reversal Movements , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[37]  Schmitz Rj.  Clinical Applications in Surface Electromyography: Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. , 1999 .

[38]  R. Ivry,et al.  Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal uncoupling during continuous bimanual movements , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  M S Gazzaniga,et al.  Variability in right hemisphere language function after callosal section: evidence for a continuum of generative capacity , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  D J Serrien,et al.  Bimanual organization of manipulative forces: evidence from erroneous feedforward programming of precision grip , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[41]  R. Johansson,et al.  Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  Spatial Conceptual Influences on the Coordination of Bimanual Actions: When a Dual Task Becomes a Single Task , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[43]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Variability and Motor Control , 1993 .

[44]  H Heuer,et al.  Structural constraints on bimanual movements , 1993, Psychological research.

[45]  R. Ivry,et al.  Moving to Directly Cued Locations Abolishes Spatial Interference During Bimanual Actions , 2001, Psychological science.

[46]  S. Cardoso de Oliveira,et al.  Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  Roland S. Johansson,et al.  Sensorimotor interactions between pairs of fingers in bimanual and unimanual manipulative tasks , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  R. Johansson,et al.  Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  E. Fetz.  Movement control: Are movement parameters recognizably coded in the activity of single neurons? , 1992 .

[50]  K. Newell,et al.  Force variability in isometric responses. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Richard B Ivry,et al.  Temporal Control and Coordination: The Multiple Timer Model , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[52]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Structural Constraints on the Performance of Symmetrical Bimanual Movements with Different Amplitudes , 1995 .