Comfort in Slender Bridges Subjected to Traffic Loading and Hammering Effects

The verification of the Serviceability Limit State (SLS) of vibrations due to traffic live loads is typically ignored in the design of road bridges with conventional concrete decks. However, the vibrations perceived by pedestrians usually govern the design in slender and light-weight modern structures that take advantage of the improvement in the structural efficiency, material performance and constructive procedures. On the other hand, the comfort of the vehicle users is traditionally ignored in the design of the bridge because pedestrians are usually more sensitive to vibrations. However, in many highway bridges without pathways the only users of the structure are those in the vehicles (drivers and passengers). Considering all the possible bridge users and their specific sensitiveness, this paper addresses the vibration serviceability in a slender under-deck cable-stayed bridge subjected to heavy traffic loading. In this structure the prestressed concrete deck spans a distance of 80 m with a depth-to-span ratio of 1/80. The vehicle-bridge interaction accounts for aspects traditionally ignored like the wheel dimensions and the cross-slope of the bridge. A large number of time-history analyses is conducted to address the influence of road and vehicle properties on the SLS of vibrations. This work is completed with the study of the vehicle impact when it enters and leaves the bridge. The results clearly demonstrate the influence of the wheel dimensions and the road conditions, as well as the importance of high-order modes on the response.

[1]  Angel C. Aparicio,et al.  Two new types of bridges: under-deck cable-stayed bridges and combined cable-stayed bridges — the state of the art , 2007 .

[2]  Ana M. Ruiz-Teran,et al.  Structural behaviour and design criteria of under-deck cable-stayed bridges and combined cable-stayed bridges. Part 2: Multispan bridges. , 2008 .

[3]  Ana M. Ruiz-Teran,et al.  Serviceability limit state of vibrations in under-deck cable-stayed bridges accounting for vehicle-structure interaction , 2014 .

[4]  Bryan E. Little,et al.  American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Drainage Guidelines American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications , 2000 .

[5]  Ana M. Ruiz-Teran,et al.  Structural behaviour and design criteria of under-deck cable-stayed bridges subjected to seismic action , 2013 .

[6]  Angel C. Aparicio,et al.  Parameters governing the response of under-deck cable-stayed bridges , 2007 .

[7]  Angel C. Aparicio,et al.  Response of under-deck cable-stayed bridges to the accidental breakage of stay cables , 2009 .

[8]  Luigi Garibaldi,et al.  Dynamics of multi-span continuous straight bridges subject to multi-degrees of freedom moving vehicle excitation , 1999 .

[9]  Lu Deng,et al.  Development of dynamic impact factor for performance evaluation of existing multi-girder concrete bridges , 2010 .

[10]  S. S. Law,et al.  DYNAMIC LOAD ON CONTINUOUS MULTI-LANE BRIDGE DECK FROM MOVING VEHICLES , 2002 .