Conventionally, corporations focused on economic value creation for shareholders. However, sustainable business practices require considering sustainable value added to all stakeholders. The overall sustainable value added can be evaluated by measuring economic, environmental, and societal values created for all the stakeholders. While economic value assessment methods are commonly used and well established, there are challenges in defining and establishing methods for environmental and societal value assessment. Manufacturing is one of the key sectors for achieving economic growth. Applying the sustainable value framework in manufacturing applications requires a total product life-cycle approach that considers the four product life-cycle stages (pre-manufacturing, manufacturing, use, and post-use) and the 6R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Recover, Redesign, and Remanufacture) approach to create sustainable value for all stakeholders through sustainable manufacturing. In order to evaluate how effectively sustainable manufacturing creates sustainable value, there is a need for a structured approach for sustainability assessment. This chapter focuses on developing a sustainability performance evaluation methodology for manufacturing through the introduction of sustainability metrics that quantify and measure sustainable value in a comprehensive manner incorporating numerous factors related to creating sustainable values in sustainable manufacturing activities. The methodology defines sustainability metrics that cover economic, environmental, and social value added for products and manufacturing processes. The methodology also presents the process of normalizing, weighting, and aggregating the measurements for the sustainability metrics to evaluate the overall product sustainability index (ProdSI) and process sustainability index (ProcSI). The application of the ProdSI and ProcSI methodologies is demonstrated by a case study to evaluate the sustainability performance of an automotive component.
[1]
John Elkington,et al.
Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business
,
1998
.
[2]
Shaw C. Feng,et al.
Development Overview of Sustainable Manufacturing Metrics | NIST
,
2010
.
[3]
H Kylian,et al.
Validation of a questionnaire for assessing physical work load.
,
1999,
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.
[4]
T. Gladwin,et al.
Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research
,
1995
.
[5]
I. S. Jawahir,et al.
Priority Evaluation of Product Metrics for Sustainable Manufacturing
,
2011
.
[6]
I. S. Jawahir,et al.
Extending total life-cycle thinking to sustainable supply chain design
,
2009
.
[7]
Günther Seliger,et al.
Advances in Sustainable Manufacturing
,
2011
.
[8]
S. Hart,et al.
Creating sustainable value
,
2003
.
[9]
Fazleena Badurdeen,et al.
Transforming Supply Chains to Create Sustainable Value for All Stakeholders
,
2013
.
[10]
Chris Laszlo,et al.
Sustainable Value: How the World's Leading Companies Are Doing Well by Doing Good
,
2008
.
[11]
L. Monostori,et al.
Value creation and decision-making in sustainable society
,
2009
.
[12]
Saurabh Gupta,et al.
An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies
,
2009
.
[13]
T. Hahn,et al.
Sustainable Value Added - Measuring Corporate Contributions to Sustainability Beyond Eco-Efficiency
,
2004
.
[14]
S. K. Sikdar,et al.
Treatise on Sustainability Science and Engineering
,
2013
.
[15]
Wulf-Peter Schmidt,et al.
Ford of Europe's Product Sustainability Index
,
2007
.
[16]
Joseph Fiksel,et al.
Measuring Product Sustainability
,
1998
.