Sequencing, timing and filling rates of recruitment channels

This paper analyses the recruitment process by which employers adjust their search strategies. The focus is, in particular, on the sequence and timing of recruitment channels. Two search strategies are identified. One strategy is to advertise a vacancy, and to form a pool of candidates by activating subsequent recruitment channels such that candidates are added to the pool. An alternative strategy used by employers is to start searching via informal channels, consider applicants at arrival and continue their search along a new recruitment channel if no suitable candidates show up. Results suggest that when informal personal contacts are available to the employer, this 'switching of channel' strategy is preferred. Moreover, the results of this paper are consistent with the view that informal search methods are potentially more efficient than using an advertisement and forming a pool of applicants, in particular when vital positions in firms have to be filled.

[1]  K. Leicht,et al.  The consequences of informal job finding for men and women , 1997 .

[2]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Employers' Recruitment Behaviour: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Personnel Management Attitudes* , 1997 .

[3]  G. V. D. Berg,et al.  Nonstationarity in job search theory , 1990 .

[4]  J. Abbring,et al.  Sequential or non-sequential employers' search? , 1994 .

[5]  Kurt F. Geisinger,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RECRUITING SOURCE, APPLICANT QUALITY, AND HIRE PERFORMANCE: AN ANALYSIS BY SEX, ETHNICITY, AND AGE , 1989 .

[6]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Barriers to employment: Entry and re-entry possibilities of unemployed job seekers in The Netherlands , 1993 .

[7]  Philip Hougaard,et al.  Modelling multivariate survival , 1987 .

[8]  S. Roper Recruitment Methods and Vacancy Duration , 1988 .

[9]  S. Lippman,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF JOB SEARCH: A SURVEY* , 1976 .

[10]  John M. Barron,et al.  EXTENSIVE SEARCH, INTENSIVE SEARCH, AND HIRING COSTS: NEW EVIDENCE ON EMPLOYER HIRING ACTIVITY , 1985 .

[11]  P. Morgan Search and Optimal Sample Sizes , 1983 .

[12]  N. Kiefer,et al.  THE EMPIRICAL STATUS OF JOB SEARCH THEORY , 1993 .

[13]  H. Holzer Hiring Procedures in the Firm: Their Economic Determinants and Outcomes , 1987 .

[14]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Employers' recruitment behaviour and vacancy duration; An empirical analysis for the Dutch labour market , 1996 .

[15]  John M. Barron,et al.  Job Matching and On-the-Job Training , 1989, Journal of Labor Economics.

[16]  Dale T. Mortensen,et al.  Personal contacts and earnings , 1994 .

[17]  Jan C. van Ours,et al.  Vacancy durations : search or selection? , 2009 .

[18]  J. C. D. Ours Durations of Dutch job vacancies , 1989 .

[19]  J. C. van Ours,et al.  Matching employers and workers : An empirical analysis on the effectiveness of search , 1991 .

[20]  G. Ridder,et al.  Vacancies and the Recruitment of New Employees , 1992, Journal of Labor Economics.

[21]  Edi Karni,et al.  Search theory: The case of search with uncertain recall , 1977 .

[22]  Harry J. Holzer,et al.  Search Method Use by Unemployed Youth , 1986, Journal of Labor Economics.

[23]  John M. Barron,et al.  Employer Search: The Interviewing and Hiring of New Employees , 1985 .

[24]  R. Feinberg,et al.  The Superiority of Sequential Search: A Calculation , 1977 .