Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

OBJECTIVES To describe novel robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) instruments, and present the initial laboratory experience in urology. METHODS The VeSPA surgical instruments (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) were designed to be used with the DaVinci Si surgical system. A multichannel port and curved cannulae were inserted through a single 3.5-cm umbilical incision. The port allowed 1 scope, 2 robotic instruments, and a 5- to 12-mm assistant instrument. Four pyeloplasties (right 2, left 2), 4 partial nephrectomies (right 2, left 2), and 8 nephrectomies (right 4, left 4) were performed in 4 female farm pigs (mean weight, 34.5 kg). Technical feasibility and efficiency were assessed in addition to perioperative outcomes. RESULTS All 16 R-LESS procedures were performed successfully without the addition of laparoscopic ports or open conversion. Mean total operative time was 110 minutes (range, 82-127), and mean blood loss was 20 mL (range, 10-100). Mean warm ischemia time for partial nephrectomy was 14.8 minutes (range, 12-20). There were no intraoperative complications. No robotic system failures occurred, and robotic instrument clashing was found to be minimal. One needle driver malfunctioned and assistant movement was limited. CONCLUSIONS R-LESS kidney surgery using the VeSPA instruments is feasible and efficient in the porcine model. The system offers a wide range of motion, instrument and scope stability, improved ergonomics, and minimal instrument clashing. Although preliminary experience is encouraging, further refinements are expected to optimize urological applications of this robotic technology.

[1]  Jihad H Kaouk,et al.  Technological Advances in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery , 2022 .

[2]  J. Cadeddu,et al.  Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. , 2009, European urology.

[3]  Jihad H Kaouk,et al.  Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using GelPort as the access platform. , 2010, European urology.

[4]  I. Gill,et al.  Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. , 2010, European urology.

[5]  R. Goel,et al.  NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy: first human experience. , 2009, Urology.

[6]  E. Barret,et al.  A transition to laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) radical prostatectomy: human cadaver experimental and initial clinical experience. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[7]  Jihad H Kaouk,et al.  Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy. , 2009, European urology.

[8]  Sebastien Crouzet,et al.  Single-port urological surgery: single-center experience with the first 100 cases. , 2009, Urology.

[9]  Sebastien Crouzet,et al.  Robotic single‐port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report , 2009, BJU international.

[10]  Chad R. Tracy,et al.  Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. , 2009, Urology.

[11]  S. Bhayani,et al.  Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes. , 2009, European urology.

[12]  Estevão Lima,et al.  Current status and future perspectives in laparoendoscopic single‐site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic urological surgery , 2010, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.