Social network activity and contributing to an online review site

Purpose – The purpose of the studies was to test if extent of prior social media activity could predict likelihood that a consumer would post reviews on a new review website.Design/methodology/approach – Two online surveys were conducted presenting scenarios in which users were asked about prior social media activity, the number of social networks they belonged to in study one, and how actively they had posted reviews in study two. These questions were followed by descriptions of new review websites, a general local merchant review website in study one and a local restaurant review website in study two.Findings – Although demographics did a poor job of predicting who would post reviews on the new review websites, prior active social media use and review posting did modestly predict intention to post reviews on the new review websites.Research limitations/implications – This is not an experimental study and so causality cannot be claimed. Descriptively, although the results were consistent in two studies u...

[1]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[2]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[3]  V. Dhar,et al.  Does Chatter Matter? The Impact of User-Generated Content on Music Sales , 2007 .

[4]  Melissa Joy Magnuson,et al.  Gender Differences in "Social Portraits" Reflected in MySpace Profiles , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  David J. Faulds,et al.  Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix , 2009 .

[6]  Katherine M. White,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behavior Applied to Young People's Use of Social Networking Web Sites , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[8]  Raji Srinivasan,et al.  Social Influence Effects in Online Product Ratings , 2012 .

[9]  Robert D. Jewell,et al.  The influence of past behavior on behavioral intent: An information‐processing explanation , 2008 .

[10]  N. Ellison,et al.  Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis , 2008 .

[11]  Edward Shih-Tse Wang,et al.  Investigating member commitment to virtual communities using an integrated perspective , 2012, Internet Res..

[12]  Efthymios Constantinides,et al.  Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues , 2008 .

[13]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  The Influence of Personality on Active and Passive Use of Social Networking Sites , 2011 .

[14]  Guosong Shao,et al.  Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification perspective , 2009, Internet Res..

[15]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process , 2009 .

[16]  Saokosal Oum,et al.  An empirical study of the determinants of the intention to participate in user-created contents (UCC) services , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Shih-Ming Pi,et al.  The effects of user perception of value on use of blog services , 2010 .

[18]  Efthymios Constantinides,et al.  Segmentation of users of social networking websites , 2012 .

[19]  Daryl Travis.  BRANDING IN THE DIGITAL AGE , 2001 .

[20]  Andrei Hagiu.  Merchant or Two-Sided Platform? , 2006 .

[21]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Understanding use continuance in virtual worlds: Empirical test of a research model , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Shelly Farnham,et al.  Designing for improved social responsibility, user participation and content in on-line communities , 2002, CHI.

[23]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Habit as an explanation of participation in an online peer-production community , 2012, CHI.

[24]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Gender, Internet Identification, and Internet Anxiety: Correlates of Internet Use , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[25]  Valerie Barker,et al.  Older Adolescents' Motivations for Social Network Site Use: The Influence of Gender, Group Identity, and Collective Self-Esteem , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  Benedikt Jahn,et al.  How to Transform Consumers into Fans of Your Brand , 2012 .

[27]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures , 2007 .

[28]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  From Gaussian to Paretian Thinking: Causes and Implications of Power Laws in Organizations , 2009 .

[29]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[30]  Bruno Jullien,et al.  Two-Sided Markets and Electronic Intermediaries , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[31]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  Oded Nov,et al.  What motivates Wikipedians? , 2007, CACM.

[33]  Hyun-Hwa Lee,et al.  Consumer perceptions of online consumer product and service reviews: Focusing on information processing confidence and susceptibility to peer influence , 2012 .

[34]  William H. Glick,et al.  Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? , 1998 .

[35]  John Kim,et al.  What makes users rate (share, tag, edit...)?: predicting patterns of participation in online communities , 2012, CSCW.

[36]  Ulrich Kaiser,et al.  Price structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from the magazine industry , 2006 .

[37]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  Electronic Word-of-Mouth , 2008 .

[38]  Louis Leung,et al.  User-generated content on the internet: an examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment , 2009, New Media Soc..