What’s in Twitter, I know what parties are popular and who you are supporting now!

In modern politics, parties and individual candidates must have an online presence and usually have dedicated social media coordinators. In this context, we study the usefulness of analysing Twitter messages to identify both the characteristics of political parties and the political leaning of users. As a case study, we collected the main stream of Twitter related to the 2010 UK General Election during the associated period—gathering around 1,150,000 messages from about 220,000 users. We examined the characteristics of the three main parties in the election and highlighted the main differences between parties. First, the retweet structure is highly clustered according to political parties. Second, users are more likely to refer to their preferred party and use more positive affect words for the party compared with other parties. Finally, the self-description of users and the List feature can reflect the political orientation of users. From these observations, we develop both an incremental and practical classification method which uses the number of Twitter messages referring to a particular political party or retweets, and a classifier leveraging the valuable semantic content of the List feature to estimate the overall political leaning of users. The experimental results showed that the proposed incremental method achieved an accuracy of 86 % for classifying the users’ political leanings and outperforms other classification methods that require expensive costs for tuning classifier parameters and/or knowledge about network topology. This advantage allows this approach to be a good candidate for social media analytics application in real time for political institution. The proposed method using List feature, in turn, achieved an accuracy of 92 %.

[1]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the 'contact hypothesis.' , 1986 .

[2]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series , 2010, ICWSM.

[3]  Roland Traunmüller Web 2.0 Creates a New Government , 2010, EGOVIS.

[4]  Helen K. Liu Public Service, Governance and Web 2.0 Technologies: Future Trends in Social Media , 2012 .

[5]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  The personality of popular facebook users , 2012, CSCW.

[6]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  Characterizing user behavior in online social networks , 2009, IMC '09.

[7]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  In the Mood for Being Influential on Twitter , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[8]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Participative Public Policy Making Through Multiple Social Media Platforms Utilization , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[9]  Christine B. Williams,et al.  Web 2.0 and Politics: The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election and an E-Politics Research Agenda , 2010, MIS Q..

[10]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework , 2012, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[11]  Derek L. Hansen,et al.  Computing political preference among twitter followers , 2011, CHI.

[12]  William W. Cohen,et al.  The MultiRank Bootstrap Algorithm: Self-Supervised Political Blog Classification and Ranking Using Semi-Supervised Link Classification , 2021, ICWSM.

[13]  Réka Albert,et al.  Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[15]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[16]  Ana-Maria Popescu,et al.  Democrats, republicans and starbucks afficionados: user classification in twitter , 2011, KDD.

[17]  Matthew A. Jones,et al.  Public Service, Governance and Web 2.0 Technologies: Future Trends in Social Media , 2012 .

[18]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  In the mood being influential on twitter mood , 2011, SocialCom 2011.

[19]  Panagiotis Takis Metaxas,et al.  Limits of Electoral Predictions Using Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[20]  David A. Shamma,et al.  Characterizing debate performance via aggregated twitter sentiment , 2010, CHI.

[21]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Inferring who-is-who in the Twitter social network , 2012, WOSN '12.

[22]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Social Impact , 2019, Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics.

[23]  Qiaozhu Mei,et al.  Classifying the Political Leaning of News Articles and Users from User Votes , 2011, ICWSM.

[24]  S. McClurg,et al.  Social Networks and Political Participation: The Role of Social Interaction in Explaining Political Participation , 2003 .

[25]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[26]  Guillaume Bouchard,et al.  Opinion Formation in the Social Web: Agent-Based Simulations of Opinion Convergence and Divergence , 2011, ADMI.

[27]  Jody C. Baumgartner,et al.  MyFaceTube Politics , 2010 .

[28]  Guillaume Bouchard,et al.  Opinion mining in social media: modeling, simulating, and visualizing political opinion formation in the web , 2011, dg.o '11.

[29]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Predicting the Future with Social Media , 2010, Web Intelligence.

[30]  Antoine Boutet,et al.  What’s in Twitter, I know what parties are popular and who you are supporting now! , 2012, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[31]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Election Forecasts With Twitter , 2011 .

[32]  Michael Bang Petersen,et al.  Political Parties and Value Consistency in Public Opinion Formation , 2010 .

[33]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[34]  Antoine Boutet,et al.  What's in Your Tweets? I Know Who You Supported in the UK 2010 General Election , 2012, ICWSM.

[35]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The Party Is Over Here: Structure and Content in the 2010 Election , 2011, ICWSM.

[36]  Nitin Agarwal,et al.  Modeling blogger influence in a community , 2011, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[37]  D. Boyd,et al.  Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization Over Time on Twitter , 2010 .

[38]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Media Landscape in Twitter: A World of New Conventions and Political Diversity , 2011, ICWSM.

[39]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  The Revolution Will be Networked , 2010 .

[40]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Tracking "gross community happiness" from tweets , 2012, CSCW.

[41]  James N. Druckman,et al.  How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation , 2013, American Political Science Review.

[42]  Ana-Maria Popescu,et al.  A Machine Learning Approach to Twitter User Classification , 2011, ICWSM.

[43]  Said Kashoob,et al.  Temporal dynamics of communities in social bookmarking systems , 2012, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[44]  Karl Branting,et al.  Context-sensitive detection of local community structure , 2012, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[45]  Anonymous Authors,et al.  Modeling Polarizing Topics: When Do Different Political Communities Respond Differently to the Same News? , 2012 .

[46]  Adam D. I. Kramer An unobtrusive behavioral model of "gross national happiness" , 2010, CHI.

[47]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Political Communication and Influence through Microblogging--An Empirical Analysis of Sentiment in Twitter Messages and Retweet Behavior , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[48]  Narsingh Deo,et al.  Efficient community identification in complex networks , 2012, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[49]  William W. Cohen,et al.  Modeling Polarizing Topics: When Do Different Political Communities Respond Differently to the Same News? , 2012, ICWSM.

[50]  M. Lynn Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1996 .

[51]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.