Label fusion based brain MR image segmentation via a latent selective model

Multi-atlas segmentation is an effective approach and increasingly popular for automatically labeling objects of interest in medical images. Recently, segmentation methods based on generative models and patch-based techniques have become the two principal branches of label fusion. However, these generative models and patch-based techniques are only loosely related, and the requirement for higher accuracy, faster segmentation, and robustness is always a great challenge. In this paper, we propose novel algorithm that combines the two branches using global weighted fusion strategy based on a patch latent selective model to perform segmentation of specific anatomical structures for human brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. In establishing this probabilistic model of label fusion between the target patch and patch dictionary, we explored the Kronecker delta function in the label prior, which is more suitable than other models, and designed a latent selective model as a membership prior to determine from which training patch the intensity and label of the target patch are generated at each spatial location. Because the image background is an equally important factor for segmentation, it is analyzed in label fusion procedure and we regard it as an isolated label to keep the same privilege between the background and the regions of interest. During label fusion with the global weighted fusion scheme, we use Bayesian inference and expectation maximization algorithm to estimate the labels of the target scan to produce the segmentation map. Experimental results indicate that the proposed algorithm is more accurate and robust than the other segmentation methods.

[1]  George H. Chen Latent source models for nonparametric inference , 2015 .

[2]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Estimating A Reference Standard Segmentation With Spatially Varying Performance Parameters: Local MAP STAPLE , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Improving intersubject image registration using tissue-class information benefits robustness and accuracy of multi-atlas based anatomical segmentation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[4]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Sparse Patch-Based Label Fusion for Multi-Atlas Segmentation , 2012, MBIA.

[5]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Logarithm Odds Maps for Shape Representation , 2006, MICCAI.

[6]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  A Generative Model for Image Segmentation Based on Label Fusion , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  A Probabilistic Patch-Based Label Fusion Model for Multi-Atlas Segmentation With Registration Refinement: Application to Cardiac MR Images , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  A Generative Model for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Multi-Modal Images , 2010, MICCAI.

[10]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso , 2006, math/0608017.

[11]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains , 2004, NeuroImage.

[12]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Yinghuan Shi,et al.  Semi-Automatic Segmentation of Prostate in CT Images via Coupled Feature Representation and Spatial-Constrained Transductive Lasso , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  D. Rueckert,et al.  Multi-Method Analysis of MRI Images in Early Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  Juha Koikkalainen,et al.  Fast and robust multi-atlas segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[17]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[18]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  An algorithm for optimal fusion of atlases with different labeling protocols , 2015, NeuroImage.

[19]  Konstantinos Arfanakis,et al.  Ex vivo MR volumetry of human brain hemispheres , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Yaozong Gao,et al.  Segmentation of neonatal brain MR images using patch-driven level sets , 2014, NeuroImage.

[21]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Polina Golland,et al.  Automated segmentation of hippocampal subfields from ultra‐high resolution in vivo MRI , 2009, Hippocampus.

[23]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Hierarchical multi-atlas label fusion with multi-scale feature representation and label-specific patch partition , 2015, NeuroImage.

[24]  Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano,et al.  Combination Strategies in Multi-Atlas Image Segmentation: Application to Brain MR Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.