Switchgrass simulation by the ALMANAC model at diverse sites in the southern US

Simulation models for plant species important for biofuel such as switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) can be used to make management decisions related to biomass productivity and related to environmental impacts such as soil erosion and changes in surface and groundwater quality. The present study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of simulation of switchgrass biomass production by the ALMANAC (Agricultural Land Management Alternatives with Numerical Assessment Criteria) model at sites in Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana. We used multi-year field data for Alamo switchgrass yields at each of five sites to evaluate ALMANAC. The model realistically simulated mean switchgrass yields at each of the locations and the total variability of all the data pooled, but did not perform as well in accounting for the year-to-year variability within some locations. Sensitivity analysis showed that changes in runoff curve number (CN) and changes in maximum stomatal conductance (GSI) had variable impacts on simulated values among the sites. A 15% change in CN changed mean annual biomass yield from 0% to 16% depending on location. Changing GSI from 4 to 8mm s 1 changed mean annual biomass from 1% to 31% depending on location. ALMANAC shows promise as a tool to realistically simulate mean biomass yields and variability around the mean for multi-year runs of switchgrass at e front matter Published by Elsevier Ltd. ombioe.2005.06.003 ng author. Tel.: +254 770 6506; fax:+254 770 6561. esses: jkiniry@spa.ars.usda.gov (J.R. Kiniry), kcassida@afscr.ars.usda.gov (K.A. Cassida), mhussey@tamu.edu , jmuir@ag.tamu.edu (J.P. Muir), ocumpaugh@bcni.net (W.R. Ocumpaugh), j-read@tamu.edu (J.C. Read), o.edu (R.L. Reed), matt.sanderson@ars.usda.gov (M.A. Sanderson), bvenuto@grl1.grl.ars.usda.gov (B.C. Venuto), mus.edu (J.R. Williams).

[1]  George H. Hargreaves,et al.  Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature , 1985 .

[2]  C. R. Tischler,et al.  Radiation use efficiency and leaf CO2 exchange for diverse C4 grasses. , 1999 .

[3]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[4]  James R. Kiniry,et al.  Maize and Sorghum Simulation in Diverse Texas Environments , 1998 .

[5]  J. R. Bell,et al.  Simulating grass productivity on diverse range sites in Texas , 2002 .

[6]  D. D. Wolf,et al.  Switchgrass as a sustainable bioenergy crop , 1996 .

[7]  John R. Williams,et al.  The ALMANAC model's sensitivity to input variables , 2003 .

[8]  Yun Xie,et al.  Maize and Sorghum Simulations with CERES-Maize, SORKAM, and ALMANAC under Water-Limiting Conditions , 2001 .

[9]  Modelling crop:weed interactions in wheat with ALMANAC , 1997 .

[10]  W. Baier,et al.  ESTIMATION OF LATENT EVAPORATION FROM SIMPLE WEATHER OBSERVATIONS , 1965 .

[11]  M. Monsi.  Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung fur die Stoffproduktion , 1953 .

[12]  John R. Williams,et al.  A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity [EPIC, Erosion-Productivity Impact Calculator, mathematical models] , 1984 .

[13]  William R Ocumpaugh,et al.  Simulating Alamo Switchgrass with the ALMANAC Model , 1996 .

[14]  John R. Williams,et al.  A general, process-oriented model for two competing plant species , 1992 .

[15]  William R Ocumpaugh,et al.  Biomass Production of ‘Alamo’ Switchgrass in Response to Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Row Spacing , 2001 .

[16]  P. Hunt,et al.  State of the art for animal wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[17]  J. Monteith.  Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[18]  H. L. Penman.  Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.