Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements

Recent research has shown that differences in the effectiveness of spatial frequencies for fast and slow skilled adult readers may be an important component of differences in reading ability in the skilled adult reading population (Jordan et al., 2016a). But the precise nature of this influence on lexical processing during reading remains to be fully determined. Accordingly, to gain more insight into the use of spatial frequencies by skilled adult readers with fast and slow reading abilities, the present study looked at effects of spatial frequencies on the processing of specific target words in sentences. These target words were of either high or low lexical frequency and each sentence was displayed as normal or filtered to contain only very low, low, medium, high, or very high spatial frequencies. Eye movement behavior for target words was closest to normal for each reading ability when text was shown in medium or higher spatial frequency displays, although reading occurred for all spatial frequencies. Moreover, typical word frequency effects (the processing advantage for words with higher lexical frequencies) were observed for each reading ability across a broad range of spatial frequencies, indicating that many different spatial frequencies provide access to lexical representations during textual reading for both fast and slow skilled adult readers. Crucially, however, target word fixations were fewer and shorter for fast readers than for slow readers for all display types, and this advantage for fast readers appeared to be similar for normal, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies but larger for low and very low spatial frequencies. Therefore, although fast and slow skilled adult readers can both use a broad range of spatial frequencies when reading, fast readers make more effective use of these spatial frequencies, and especially those that are lower, when processing the identities of words.

[1]  J. Robson.  Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[2]  James I. Brown.  The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. , 1960 .

[3]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Reading with a filtered fovea: The influence of visual quality at the point of fixation during reading , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements of Highly Skilled and Average Readers: Differential Effects of Frequency and Predictability , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  F L Ferris,et al.  Standardizing the measurement of visual acuity for clinical research studies: Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[7]  Debra L. Long,et al.  Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. , 1994 .

[8]  Sarah J. White,et al.  The effects of interword spacing on the eye movements of young and older readers , 2015 .

[9]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  S. Andrews,et al.  Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: individual differences in masked form priming. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension , 2007 .

[12]  Kevin B Paterson,et al.  Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[14]  Christof Körner,et al.  The Relation between Reading Skills and Eye Movement Patterns in Adolescent Readers: Evidence from a Regular Orthography , 2016, PloS one.

[15]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Eye Movement Control , 2014, Journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  Filtered text reveals adult age differences in reading: evidence from eye movements. , 2013, Psychology and aging.

[17]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Psychology of Reading , 2012 .

[18]  J. D. Murray,et al.  Activation and Encoding of Predictive Inferences: The Role of Reading Skill , 2003 .

[19]  A. Anastasi.  Individual differences. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Lexical Expertise and Reading Skill , 2008 .

[21]  V. Kuperman,et al.  Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[22]  J. Hegdé.  Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[23]  Mei-Ching Lien,et al.  A multistream model of visual word recognition , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Timothy R Jordan,et al.  Spatial frequency sensitivity differences between adults of good and poor reading ability. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  What’s left? An eye movement study of the influence of interword spaces to the left of fixation during reading , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Kevin B Paterson,et al.  A further look at postview effects in reading: An eye-movements study of influences from the left of fixation. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Colin J Davis,et al.  The spatial coding model of visual word identification. , 2010, Psychological review.

[28]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Processing determinants of reading speed. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[31]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Binocular Coordination of the Eyes during Reading: Word Frequency and Case Alternation Affect Fixation Duration but not Fixation Disparity , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Out of Sight, out of Mind: The Rarity of Assessing and Reporting Participants' Visual Abilities When Studying Perception of Linguistic Stimuli , 2011, Perception.

[35]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  Effects of adult aging on reading filtered text: evidence from eye movements , 2013, PeerJ.

[36]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  K. Rayner.  The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and the perceptual span in silent and oral reading , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[40]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  Eye Movements Reveal Effects of Visual Content on Eye Guidance and Lexical Access during Reading , 2012, PloS one.

[41]  F. Hutzler,et al.  On forward inferences of fast and slow readers. An eye movement study , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[42]  I L Bailey,et al.  The Design and Use of a New Near‐Vision Chart , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[43]  Kevin B Paterson,et al.  Fast and slow readers and the effectiveness of the spatial frequency content of text: Evidence from reading times and eye movements. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Lexical Quality and Eye Movements: Individual Differences in the Perceptual Span of Skilled Adult Readers , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Are Individual Differences in Reading Speed Related to Extrafoveal Visual Acuity and Crowding? , 2015, PloS one.

[46]  C. Perfetti.  The Representation Problem in Reading Acquisition , 1992 .

[47]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[48]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Adaptation to spatial stimuli. , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[50]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[51]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal processing in reading , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[52]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control , 1998, Vision Research.

[53]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmask boundaries. , 1990 .

[54]  Jolyn Hersch,et al.  Lexical Quality and Reading Skill: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Contributions to Sentence Processing , 2012 .

[55]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Perceiving exterior letters of words: differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Spatial-frequency requirements for reading revisited , 2011, Vision Research.

[57]  Reading with filtered fixations: adult age differences in the effectiveness of low-level properties of text within central vision. , 2014, Psychology and aging.

[58]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[59]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[60]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Subtlex-UK: A New and Improved Word Frequency Database for British English , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[62]  B. Skottun,et al.  The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: the evidence from contrast sensitivity , 2000, Vision Research.

[63]  D. Badcock,et al.  Specific reading disability: differences in contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency. , 1980, Science.