Testosterone, facial symmetry and cooperation in the prisoners' dilemma

Recent research has analyzed how individual characteristics, like the exposure to different hormones and symmetry, affect decision-making and strategic behaviour. The present article investigates the effect of symmetry, of exposure to testosterone (T) in utero and during puberty and of current T on cooperation in a Prisoners' Dilemma Game (PDG). T is a hormone with well known effect on males' behaviour, and that promotes activities that seek to increase reproductive success. Fluctuating Asymmetry (FA) reflects the ability of the organism to maintain a stable development and it is usually employed as a variable reflecting genetic quality (low FA values are thought to signal higher genetic quality). Our results show that subjects with intermediate levels of second to fourth digit ratio (a proxy of exposure to T in utero) and with high FA cooperate more often in the PDG. We also observe that the latter effect is due to the fact that FA has an impact on subjects' expectations about the behaviour of their counterpart in the game. These results reinforce the described link between markers related to genetic quality and cooperative behaviour. This possible linkage of individual condition and pro-social behaviour in humans clearly merits further attention.

[1]  G. Rhodes.  The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  Johannes Hönekopp,et al.  Second to fourth digit length ratio (2D:4D) and adult sex hormone levels: New data and a meta-analytic review , 2007, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[3]  A. Karter,et al.  Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[4]  Jonathan W. Roberti,et al.  A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking , 2004 .

[5]  J. Wingfield.  A continuing saga: The role of testosterone in aggression , 2005, Hormones and Behavior.

[6]  A. Little,et al.  Attraction independent of detection suggests special mechanisms for symmetry preferences in human face perception , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  S. Dewitte,et al.  The presence of aggression cues inverts the relation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and prosocial behaviour in a dictator game. , 2009, British journal of psychology.

[8]  J. Sakata,et al.  Evolutionary insights into the regulation of courtship behavior in male amphibians and reptiles , 2004, Physiology & Behavior.

[9]  G. Marwell,et al.  Economists free ride, does anyone else? : Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV , 1981 .

[10]  Pranjal H. Mehta,et al.  Testosterone change after losing predicts the decision to compete again , 2006, Hormones and Behavior.

[11]  B. Fink,et al.  Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[13]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry , 2003 .

[14]  Siegfried Dewitte,et al.  Second to fourth digit ratio and cooperative behavior , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[15]  R. Trivers,et al.  Fluctuating Asymmetry of Responders Affects Offers in the Ultimatum Game Oppositely According to Attractiveness or Need as Perceived by Proposers , 2009 .

[16]  D. Perrett,et al.  Menstrual cycle alters face preference , 1999, Nature.

[17]  C. Apicella,et al.  Testosterone and financial risk preferences , 2008 .

[18]  Alan Booth,et al.  The “trouble” with salivary testosterone , 2004, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[19]  L. Fusani.  Testosterone control of male courtship in birds , 2008, Hormones and Behavior.

[20]  G. Demas,et al.  Novel mechanisms for neuroendocrine regulation of aggression , 2008, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology.

[21]  C. Sisk,et al.  Puberty: A Finishing School for Male Social Behavior , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  L. Simmons,et al.  How well does second–to–fourth–digit ratio in hands correlate with other indications of masculinity in males? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  D. Maestripieri,et al.  Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  R. Ziegler,et al.  Skeletal Site-Dependent Expression of the Androgen Receptor in Human Osteoblastic Cell Populations , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[25]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS OF DEVELOPMENTAL INSTABILITY: ANALYZING PATTERNS OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY WITH PROCRUSTES METHODS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  Coren L Apicella,et al.  Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Peter T. Ellison.  Beauty: In the gonads of the beholder — and the beheld , 2008, Hormones and Behavior.

[28]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The relationship between sexual dimorphism in human faces and fluctuating asymmetry , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Jinsheng Kang,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  R. Trivers,et al.  Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples , 2004 .

[33]  J. Manning,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and aggression in boys , 1998, Human nature.

[34]  A. Meyer,et al.  SHAPE ANALYSIS OF SYMMETRIC STRUCTURES: QUANTIFYING VARIATION AMONG INDIVIDUALS AND ASYMMETRY , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Sex hormones and finger length: What does 2D:4D indicate? , 2004 .

[36]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry Is Related to Sexual Dimorphism in Faces: Data Across Culture and Species , 2008, PloS one.

[37]  Rebecca C. Knickmeyer,et al.  2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. , 2004, Early human development.

[38]  M. Hines.  Prenatal testosterone and gender-related behaviour. , 2006, European journal of endocrinology.

[39]  I. Penton-Voak,et al.  Facial symmetry is positively associated with self-reported extraversion , 2007 .

[40]  John Orbell,et al.  Physical Attractiveness, Opportunity, and Success in Everyday Exchange1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  K. Wallen,et al.  Relationship between testosterone and interest in sexual stimuli: The effect of experience , 2007, Hormones and Behavior.

[44]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A STUDY OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY , 1962 .

[45]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Judging a Book by its Cover: Beauty and Expectations in the Trust Game , 2006 .

[46]  Fred L Bookstein,et al.  Dental arch asymmetry in an isolated Adriatic community. , 2006, American journal of physical anthropology.

[47]  E. Hampson,et al.  On the Relation Between 2D:4D and Sex-Dimorphic Personality Traits , 2008, Archives of sexual behavior.

[48]  I. Penton-Voak,et al.  Testosterone responses to competition in men are related to facial masculinity , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  J. Wingfield,et al.  The "Challenge Hypothesis": Theoretical Implications for Patterns of Testosterone Secretion, Mating Systems, and Breeding Strategies , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[50]  M. Nowak,et al.  The spatial ultimatum game , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  R. Trivers,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and behavior in the ultimatum game in Jamaica , 2007 .

[52]  J T Manning,et al.  The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[53]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[54]  J. Herbert,et al.  Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  D. K. Marcus,et al.  Sex Differences in Judgments of Physical Attractiveness: A Social Relations Analysis , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[56]  T. Burnham.  High-testosterone men reject low ultimatum game offers , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[58]  Rui F. Oliveira,et al.  Intra-sexual variation in male reproduction in teleost fish: a comparative approach , 2005, Hormones and Behavior.

[59]  D. Buss,et al.  Strategies of Human Mating , 2006 .

[60]  S. Dongen,et al.  Author ' s personal copy No association between fl uctuating asymmetry in highly stabilized traits and second to fourth digit ratio ( 2 D : 4 D ) in human fetuses , 2009 .

[61]  M. Hans,et al.  Essentials of Facial Growth , 1996 .

[62]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  S. Berenbaum,et al.  Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: methods and findings , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[64]  S. Van Dongen,et al.  No association between fluctuating asymmetry in highly stabilized traits and second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) in human fetuses. , 2009, Early human development.

[65]  S. Gangestad,et al.  Developmental stability and human violence , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  S. Dewitte,et al.  Digit Ratio (2d:4d) Moderates the Impact of Sexual Cues on Men's Decisions in Ultimatum Games , 2006, Proceedings. Biological sciences.

[67]  M. McIntyre,et al.  Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology Open Access the Use of Digit Ratios as Markers for Perinatal Androgen Action , 2022 .

[68]  J. Archer.  Testosterone and human aggression: an evaluation of the challenge hypothesis , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[69]  D. Kendall.  MORPHOMETRIC TOOLS FOR LANDMARK DATA: GEOMETRY AND BIOLOGY , 1994 .

[70]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[71]  Cynthia L. Jordan,et al.  Sexual differentiation of the vertebrate nervous system , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[72]  J. Manning.  Digit Ratio: A Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health , 2002 .

[73]  A. Møller.  Developmental Stability and Fitness: A Review , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[74]  I. Penton-Voak,et al.  High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. , 2004 .

[75]  A. Little,et al.  2D:4D and Sexually Dimorphic Facial Characteristics , 2007, Archives of sexual behavior.

[76]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Attractiveness and Cooperation in Social Exchange , 2006 .

[77]  Satoshi Kanazawa,et al.  Why Beautiful People Are More Intelligent. , 2004 .