Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction

This study evaluated the effectiveness of comprehension training embedded in a program that taught science content to 2nd graders. The program included instruction about the structure of compare-contrast expository text, emphasizing clue words, generic questions, graphic organizers, and the close analysis of well-structured text exemplars. This program was compared with a program that focused on the science content but included no compare-contrast training as well as with a no-instruction control. Regular classroom teachers (14 from 4 schools), randomly assigned to treatment, provided the instruction; 215 students (7-8 years old) participated. The study replicated acquisition and transfer effects found in an earlier study, that is, transfer to compare-contrast text with content related and unrelated to the instructional content (with no loss in the amount of science content acquired). The program also led to better performance on written and oral response measures and on 1 of the 2 measures involving authentic (less well-structured) compare-contrast text. These findings support and extend previous findings that explicit instruction in comprehension is effective as early as the primary-grade level.

[1]  Teaching Children to Read and Write , 1989 .

[2]  D. Perkins,et al.  Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanism of a Neglected Phenomenon , 1989 .

[3]  F. Danner,et al.  Children's Understanding of Intersentence Organization in the Recall of Short Descriptive Passages. , 1976 .

[4]  Kathryn A. LeRoy,et al.  Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention , 2006 .

[5]  Susan B. Neuman,et al.  The Role of Knowledge in Early Literacy , 2001 .

[6]  Alice J. Corkill.  Advance organizers: Facilitators of recall , 1992 .

[7]  Cathy Collins Block,et al.  Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices , 2001 .

[8]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[9]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Revising Social Studies Text from a Text-Processing Perspective: Evidence of Improved Comprehensibility. , 1991 .

[10]  Joanna P. Williams,et al.  Teaching Expository Text Structure to Young At-Risk Learners: Building the Basics of Comprehension Instruction , 2004 .

[11]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  Text organization: Research bases. , 1998 .

[12]  Christine C. Pappas,et al.  Is Narrative “Primary”? Some Insights from Kindergarteners' Pretend Readings of Stories and Information Books , 1993 .

[13]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[14]  Joanna P. Williams,et al.  Expository Text Comprehension in the Primary Grade Classroom. , 2005 .

[15]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Models of Understanding Text , 1996 .

[16]  M. Stein,et al.  Improving Reading Comprehension by Using Paragraph Restatements , 1987, Exceptional children.

[17]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Reading Instruction That Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching , 1998 .

[18]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[19]  Shirley V. Dickson.  INTEGRATING READING AND WRITING TO TEACH COMPARE-CONTRAST TEXT STRUCTURE: A RESEARCH-BASED METHODOLOGY , 1999 .

[20]  Dc Washington.  National Reading Panel. , 2000 .

[21]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[22]  Karen R. Harris,et al.  Making the Writing Process Work : Strategies for Composition and Self-Regulation , 1999 .

[23]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. , 1994 .

[24]  Carol Sue Englert,et al.  Sensitivity to Text Structure in Reading and Writing: A Comparison Between Learning Disabled and Non-Learning Disabled Students , 1987 .

[25]  Mabel A. b. Bessey,et al.  Reading for understanding , 1936 .

[26]  P. van den Broek,et al.  Children's and adults' memory for television stories: the role of causal factors, story-grammar categories, and hierarchical level. , 1996, Child development.

[27]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Discourse Type on Recall , 1984 .

[28]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Structural Aspects of Constructing Meaning From Text , 2000 .

[29]  Edward J. Kameenui,et al.  What Reading Research Tells Us about Children with Diverse Learning Needs: Bases and Basics. The LEA Series on Special Education and Disability. , 1998 .

[30]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[31]  Alice Wilder,et al.  Students with severe learning disabilities can learn higher order comprehension skills. , 2001 .

[32]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of organizational signals on text-processing strategies. , 1995 .

[33]  Harry Singer,et al.  Theoretical models and processes of reading , 1976 .

[34]  J. V. van Leeuwe,et al.  The Effect of Instructing the Structural Aspect of Texts , 2002 .

[35]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Structure Strategy Training and Signaling on Recall of Text. , 2001 .

[36]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Can Advance Organizers Influence Meaningful Learning? , 1979 .

[37]  B. Meyer.  Identification of the Structure of prose and Its Implications for the Study of Reading and Memorya , 1975 .

[38]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Learning to read in American schools : basal readers and content texts , 1984 .

[39]  Marilyn J. Chambliss,et al.  Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. , 1995 .

[40]  Elizabeth B. Bernhardt.  Assessing Science Knowledge in an English/Spanish Bilingual Elementary School. , 1995 .

[41]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[42]  D. Kear,et al.  Children's Attitudes toward Reading: A National Survey. , 1995 .

[43]  J. Chall,et al.  Readability revisited : the new Dale-Chall readability formula , 1995 .

[44]  R. Glaser.  Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[45]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Preventing reading difficulties in young children , 1998 .

[46]  Catherine Curry,et al.  So What's New in the New Basals? a Focus on First Grade , 1994 .

[47]  Barbara M. Taylor,et al.  Text Structure and Children's Comprehension and Memory for Expository Material. , 1982 .

[48]  Bonnie B. Armbruster.  Does Text Structure/Summarization Instruction Facilitate Learning from Expository Text? Technical Report No. 394. , 1986 .

[49]  Robert C. Calfee,et al.  Designing Science Textbooks to Enhance Student Understanding , 1989 .

[50]  Barbara Moss.  A qualitative assessment of first graders' retelling of expository text , 1997 .

[51]  Okhee Lee,et al.  Teacher Professional Development to Improve the Science and Literacy Achievement of English Language Learners , 2003 .

[52]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[53]  H. Swanson,et al.  Experimental Intervention Research on Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes , 1998 .

[54]  Kathleen C. Perencevich,et al.  Increasing Reading Comprehension and Engagement Through Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction , 2004 .

[55]  R. Lomax,et al.  Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. , 1987 .

[56]  Timothy C. Standal,et al.  Signals in Expository Prose: Effects on Reading Comprehension. , 1987 .

[57]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Sources of comprehension failure: Theoretical perspectives and case studies. , 1996 .

[58]  Bernice Y.L. Wong,et al.  Investigating Awareness of and Teaching Passage Organization in Learning Disabled Children , 1984, Journal of learning disabilities.

[59]  Brenda L. Sabey,et al.  Expository Text Comprehension: Helping Primary-Grade Teachers Use Expository Texts to Full Advantage , 2005 .

[60]  Laura B. Smolkin,et al.  Supporting Comprehension Acquisition for Emerging and Struggling Readers: The Interactive Information Book Read-Aloud , 2003 .

[61]  Beyond decoding: Pictures of expository prose , 1988, Annals of dyslexia.

[62]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[63]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Creating Robust Vocabulary: Frequently Asked Questions and Extended Examples , 2008 .

[64]  Nancy Lockitch Loman,et al.  SIGNALING TECHNIQUES THAT INCREASE THE UNDERSTANDABILITY OF EXPOSITORY PROSE , 1983 .

[65]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[66]  P. V. Meter,et al.  A Quasi-experimental Validation of Transactional Strategies Instruction with Low-Achieving Second-Grade Readers. , 1996 .

[67]  Cathy Collins Block,et al.  Improving Comprehension Instruction: Rethinking Research, Theory, and Classroom Practice. , 2003 .

[68]  D. Ray Reutzel,et al.  An evaluation of two approaches for teaching reading comprehension strategies in the primary years using science information texts , 2005 .

[69]  D. Langenberg.  Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[70]  S. Sonia Gugga,et al.  Teaching elementary school students to identify story themes , 2002 .

[71]  R. F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of signaling topic structure on text recall , 1993 .

[72]  Nancy L. Stein,et al.  What's in a Story: An Approach to Comprehension and Instruction. Technical Report No. 200. , 1981 .

[73]  B. Meyer,et al.  Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth-grade children using the Internet with and without the aid of older adult tutors. , 2002 .

[74]  C. P. Casteel,et al.  Reciprocal Processes in Science and Literacy Learning. , 1994 .

[75]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Moving From the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction , 1991 .

[76]  Nell K. Duke,et al.  3.6 Minutes per Day: The Scarcity of Informational Texts in First Grade. , 2000 .

[77]  Barbara Moss,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE INFORMATIONAL TEXT GENRE IN BASAL READERS , 2002 .

[78]  Joanna P. Williams.  Improving the comprehension of disabled readers , 1998 .

[79]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Spatial learning strategies : techniques, applications, and related issues , 1984 .