Measuring the evolutionary rate of protein–protein interaction

Despite our extensive knowledge about the rate of protein sequence evolution for thousands of genes in hundreds of species, the corresponding rate of protein function evolution is virtually unknown, especially at the genomic scale. This lack of knowledge is primarily because of the huge diversity in protein function and the consequent difficulty in gauging and comparing rates of protein function evolution. Nevertheless, most proteins function through interacting with other proteins, and protein–protein interaction (PPI) can be tested by standard assays. Thus, the rate of protein function evolution may be measured by the rate of PPI evolution. Here, we experimentally examine 87 potential interactions between Kluyveromyces waltii proteins, whose one to one orthologs in the related budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been reported to interact. Combining our results with available data from other eukaryotes, we estimate that the evolutionary rate of protein interaction is (2.6 ± 1.6) × 10−10 per PPI per year, which is three orders of magnitude lower than the rate of protein sequence evolution measured by the number of amino acid substitutions per protein per year. The extremely slow evolution of protein molecular function may account for the remarkable conservation of life at molecular and cellular levels and allow for studying the mechanistic basis of human disease in much simpler organisms.

[1]  W R Engels,et al.  Gene duplication. , 1981, Science.

[2]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Rapid Subfunctionalization Accompanied by Prolonged and Substantial Neofunctionalization in Duplicate Gene Evolution , 2005, Genetics.

[3]  Julie M. Sahalie,et al.  An experimentally derived confidence score for binary protein-protein interactions , 2008, Nature Methods.

[4]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[5]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  The universal distribution of evolutionary rates of genes and distinct characteristics of eukaryotic genes of different apparent ages , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Joaquín Dopazo,et al.  The role of the environment in Parkinson's disease. , 1996, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[8]  Wenfeng Qian,et al.  Protein Subcellular Relocalization in the Evolution of Yeast Singleton and Duplicate Genes , 2009, Genome biology and evolution.

[9]  Jian-Rong Yang,et al.  Impact of translational error-induced and error-free misfolding on the rate of protein evolution , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  Kenneth H. Wolfe,et al.  Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[12]  S. L. Wong,et al.  A Map of the Interactome Network of the Metazoan C. elegans , 2004, Science.

[13]  V. Bryson,et al.  Evolving Genes and Proteins. , 1965, Science.

[14]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Why Do Hubs Tend to Be Essential in Protein Networks? , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[15]  Claus O. Wilke,et al.  Mistranslation-Induced Protein Misfolding as a Dominant Constraint on Coding-Sequence Evolution , 2008, Cell.

[16]  M. Kimura,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 1983, Scientific American.

[17]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  Sequence ― Evolution ― Function: Computational Approaches in Comparative Genomics , 2010 .

[18]  Timothy B Sackton,et al.  A Scan for Positively Selected Genes in the Genomes of Humans and Chimpanzees , 2005, PLoS biology.

[19]  M. Vidal,et al.  Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs". , 2001, Genome research.

[20]  E. Koonin,et al.  Essential genes are more evolutionarily conserved than are nonessential genes in bacteria. , 2002, Genome research.

[21]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Impact of Extracellularity on the Evolutionary Rate of Mammalian Proteins , 2010, Genome biology and evolution.

[22]  Meng-Pin Weng,et al.  Contrasting genetic paths to morphological and physiological evolution , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  M. Robinson‐Rechavi,et al.  How confident can we be that orthologs are similar, but paralogs differ? , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[24]  D. Futuyma,et al.  Evolution Since Darwin: The First 150 Years , 2010 .

[25]  Jianzhi Zhang Evolution by gene duplication: an update , 2003 .

[26]  L. Pauling,et al.  Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins , 1965 .

[27]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Why Is the Correlation between Gene Importance and Gene Evolutionary Rate So Weak? , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[28]  A. Barabasi,et al.  High-Quality Binary Protein Interaction Map of the Yeast Interactome Network , 2008, Science.

[29]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  On the Growth of Scientific Knowledge: Yeast Biology as a Case Study , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.

[31]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  More genes underwent positive selection in chimpanzee evolution than in human evolution , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  J. L. King,et al.  Non-Darwinian evolution. , 1969, Science.

[33]  Ariel S. Schwartz,et al.  An Atlas of Combinatorial Transcriptional Regulation in Mouse and Man , 2010, Cell.

[34]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Dissecting the Regulatory Circuitry of a Eukaryotic Genome , 1998, Cell.

[35]  M. Nei,et al.  Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics , 2000 .

[36]  D. Labie,et al.  Molecular Evolution , 1991, Nature.

[37]  Ziheng Yang PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[38]  Ben Lehner,et al.  Intrinsic Protein Disorder and Interaction Promiscuity Are Widely Associated with Dosage Sensitivity , 2009, Cell.

[39]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome , 1997, Nature.

[40]  Dr. Susumu Ohno Evolution by Gene Duplication , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[41]  Peter Uetz,et al.  Exhaustive benchmarking of the yeast two-hybrid system , 2010, Nature Methods.

[42]  Dongsup Kim,et al.  Analysis of a genome-wide set of gene deletions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  Russell F. Doolittle,et al.  The Roots of Bioinformatics in Protein Evolution , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Protein dispensability and rate of evolution , 2001, Nature.

[45]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Null mutations in human and mouse orthologs frequently result in different phenotypes , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  B. Birren,et al.  Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Nature.

[47]  S. Fields,et al.  A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions , 1989, Nature.

[48]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0 , 2007, Bioinform..

[49]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Significant impact of protein dispensability on the instantaneous rate of protein evolution. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[50]  M. Adams,et al.  Inferring Nonneutral Evolution from Human-Chimp-Mouse Orthologous Gene Trios , 2003, Science.

[51]  S. L. Wong,et al.  Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network , 2005, Nature.

[52]  Masatoshi Nei,et al.  Reliabilities of identifying positive selection by the branch-site and the site-prediction methods , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Kriston L. McGary,et al.  Systematic discovery of nonobvious human disease models through orthologous phenotypes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Ben-Yang Liao,et al.  Impacts of gene essentiality, expression pattern, and gene compactness on the evolutionary rate of mammalian proteins. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[55]  M. Kimura Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level , 1968, Nature.

[56]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Mechanisms of Haploinsufficiency Revealed by Genome-Wide Profiling in Yeast , 2005, Genetics.

[57]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network , 2002, Science.

[58]  A. Wagner The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[59]  C. Pál,et al.  Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. , 2001, Genetics.

[60]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[61]  Joel Dudley,et al.  TimeTree: a public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms , 2006, Bioinform..