Human resources for science and technology: Analyzing competitiveness using the analytic hierarchy process

Abstract Technology plays a key role in a country's competitiveness. Traditional analyses of national competitiveness help to understand a country's competitive advantages, but such analyses do not focus on the advantages derived from technology applications. Equally crucial for the survival and growth of a nation's technology are human resources for science and technology (HRST). Therefore, evaluating the HRST of each nation provides key information and is an important topic for research. Our research is based on 312 items from the competitiveness index given in the 2006 The World Competitiveness Yearbook published by IMD, specifically 23 selected HRST competitiveness criteria. In conjunction with professional opinions and the analytical hierarchy process, we were able to determine HRST competitiveness factors, sub-factors, and criteria weights. We provide extensive coverage of 42 countries and regional economies. We also discuss the performance of various related indexes and provide relevant suggestions.

[1]  E. Geisler,et al.  An integrated cost-performance model of research and development evaluation , 1995 .

[2]  Kazem Chaharbaghi,et al.  Defining Competitiveness: A Holistic Approach , 1994 .

[3]  A. A. Agboola,et al.  The impact of the environment on the growth of the Nigerian IT industry , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[4]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[5]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Anticipating the future high-tech competitiveness of nations: Indicators for twenty-eight countries☆ , 1996 .

[6]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units , 2000 .

[7]  R. Caves,et al.  Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis: Preface , 2007 .

[8]  Masood A. Badri,et al.  Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem , 1999 .

[9]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Application of control charts in analytic hierarchy process , 1999 .

[10]  M. K. Tiwari,et al.  A decision support system for the selection of a casting process using analytic hierarchy process , 2001 .

[11]  Nagesh Kumar Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity of multinational enterprises: the case of US and Japanese corporations , 2001 .

[12]  Pawan Sikka,et al.  Legal measures and tax incentives for encouraging science and technology development: the examples of Japan, Korea and India , 1998 .

[13]  Sallehuddin Ibrahim The role of university in promoting and developing technology: a case study of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia , 1997 .

[14]  Uma Kumar,et al.  Import-led technological capability: a comparative analysis of Indian and Indonesian manufacturing firms , 2004 .