Splintex 2.0: A physically-based model to estimate water retention and hydraulic conductivity parameters from soil physical data

Abstract Soil water retention curve (SWRC) and hydraulic conductivity curve (SHCC) are functions that contribute to the understanding and modeling of hydraulic processes in the vadose zone of the soil. However, their measurement is often difficult and expensive becoming impractical the large-scale monitoring. Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are, therefore, an alternative to estimate SWRC and SHCC data. Most PTFs are usually calibrated with data from local soils and may be uncertain when applied to soils with different morphological properties. On the other hand, PTFs with a physico-empirical basis have as advantage their wide application. Splintex 1.0 is a physico-empirical model developed in BASIC language that is based on the particle size distribution and other basic soil information. This model estimates the parameters of the van Genuchten-Mualem equation that compose the SWRC without requiring prior calibration and the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) using a texture-PTF. A second version with a user-friendly computational interface is presented to improve the estimates of the SWRC parameters and to introduce the estimation of the SHCC parameters with different PTFs, which are based on two physically-based models that can be applied universally. Computational procedures and equations of Splintex 2.0 were written in C++ language and the performance of both model versions was tested for different soil texture classes. The performance analysis was carried out using the Pearson correlation coefficient and the mean absolute and root mean square errors. Splintex 2.0 yielded good performance in the quantification of water retention data, showing its application to any soil class. As an advantage, the conductivity data can be estimated without the need of Ks and SWRC parameters.

[1]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Weighted recalibration of the Rosetta pedotransfer model with improved estimates of hydraulic parameter distributions and summary statistics (Rosetta3) , 2017 .

[2]  M. Schaap,et al.  Hydrophysical Database for Brazilian Soils (HYBRAS) and Pedotransfer Functions for Water Retention , 2018 .

[3]  M. Tuller,et al.  Prediction of the soil water retention curve for structured soil from saturation to oven‐dryness , 2017 .

[4]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Description of the unsaturated soil hydraulic database UNSODA version 2.0 , 2001 .

[5]  Y. Mualem A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity , 1976 .

[6]  J. B. Oliveira,et al.  Parãmetros de solo para o cáculo da água disponível com base na textura do solo , 1987 .

[7]  M. Schaap,et al.  An Assessment of Pedotransfer Function Performance for the Estimation of Spatial Variability of Key Soil Hydraulic Properties , 2017 .

[8]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics , 2001 .

[9]  Peter J. Shouse,et al.  Relationship between the Hydraulic Conductivity Function and the Particle‐Size Distribution , 2003 .

[10]  Peter J. Shouse,et al.  Scaling Parameter to Predict the Soil Water Characteristic from Particle-Size Distribution Data , 1999 .

[11]  Quirijn de Jong van Lier,et al.  Pedotransfer functions to estimate water retention parameters of soils in northeastern Brazil , 2013 .

[12]  M. Schaap,et al.  SPLINTEX: A physically-based pedotransfer function for modeling soil hydraulic functions , 2017 .

[13]  O. C. Rotunno Filho,et al.  Pedotransfer functions for saturated hydraulic conductivity using a database with temperate and tropical climate soils , 2019, Journal of Hydrology.

[14]  M. Durães,et al.  Evaluating pedotransfer functions of the Splintex model , 2018, European Journal of Soil Science.

[15]  C. Vaz,et al.  Validation of the Arya and Paris Water Retention Model for Brazilian Soils , 2005 .

[16]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Using Soil Survey Data for Quantitative Land Evaluation , 1989 .

[17]  J. Tomasella,et al.  Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of soil water retention in Brazilian soils. , 2000 .

[18]  Y. Pachepsky,et al.  Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology , 2004 .

[19]  Wim Cornelis,et al.  Revisiting the pseudo continuous pedotransfer function concept: impact of data quality and data mining method , 2014 .

[20]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[21]  Hans-Jörg Vogel,et al.  Moving through scales of flow and transport in soil , 2003 .

[22]  M. Schaap,et al.  Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity with pedotransfer functions: A review , 2019, Journal of Hydrology.

[23]  Jack F. Paris,et al.  A Physicoempirical Model to Predict the Soil Moisture Characteristic from Particle-Size Distribution and Bulk Density Data 1 , 1981 .

[24]  Mathieu Javaux,et al.  Revisiting Vereecken Pedotransfer Functions: Introducing a Closed‐Form Hydraulic Model , 2009 .

[25]  Quirijn de Jong van Lier,et al.  Prediction of winter wheat yield with the SWAP model using pedotransfer functions : An evaluation of sensitivity, parameterization and prediction accuracy , 2015 .

[26]  A Non‐Empirical Method for Computing Pore Radii and Soil Water Characteristics from Particle‐Size Distribution , 2015 .

[27]  J. Tomasella,et al.  The water balance of an Amazonian micro‐catchment: the effect of interannual variability of rainfall on hydrological behaviour , 2008 .

[28]  M. Cooper,et al.  Assessment of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil water retention curves for the amazon region , 2014 .