Cost Optimized Building Energy Retrofit Measures and Primary Energy Savings under Different Retrofitting Materials, Economic Scenarios, and Energy Supply

We analyze conventional retrofit building materials, aluminum, rock, and glass wool materials and compared such materials with wood-based materials to understand the lifecycle primary energy implications of moving from non-renewable to wood-based materials. We calculate cost optimum retrofit measures for a multi-apartment building in a lifecycle perspective, and lifecycle primary energy savings of each optimized measure. The retrofit measures consist of the thermal improvement of windows with varied frame materials, as well as extra insulation of attic floor, basement walls, and external walls with varied insulation materials. The most renewable-based heat supply is from a bioenergy-based district heating (DH) system. We use the marginal cost difference method to calculate cost-optimized retrofit measures. The net present value of energy cost savings of each measure with a varied energy performance is calculated and then compared with the calculated retrofit cost to identify the cost optimum of each measure. In a sensitivity analysis, we analyze the cost optimum retrofit measures under different economic and DH supply scenarios. The retrofit costs and primary energy savings vary somewhat between non-renewable and wood-based retrofit measures but do not influence the cost optimum levels significantly, as the economic parameters do. The lifecycle primary use of wood fiber insulation is about 76% and 80% less than for glass wool and rock wool, respectively. A small-scale DH system gives higher primary energy and cost savings compared to larger DH systems. The optimum final energy savings, in one of the economic scenarios, are close to meeting the requirements in one of the Swedish passive house standards.

[1]  M. Basińska,et al.  Economic and Energy Analysis of Building Retrofitting Using Internal Insulations , 2021, Energies.

[2]  F. Asdrubali,et al.  On the Retrofit of Existing Buildings with Aerogel Panels: Energy, Environmental and Economic Issues , 2021, Energies.

[3]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Retrofitting a building to passive house level: A life cycle carbon balance , 2020 .

[4]  S. Riffat,et al.  Multi-criteria assessment approach for a residential building retrofit in Norway , 2020 .

[5]  Martin K. Patel,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of large-scale deep energy retrofit packages for residential buildings under different economic assessment approaches , 2020 .

[6]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Retrofitting with different building materials: Life-cycle primary energy implications , 2020 .

[7]  Vincenzo Stornelli,et al.  Environmental and economic benefits of optimal insulation thickness: A life-cycle cost analysis , 2019 .

[8]  B. Moshfegh,et al.  Investigating cost-optimal energy renovation of a multifamily building in Sweden , 2019, Energy and Buildings.

[9]  D. D’Agostino,et al.  Evaluation of the optimal thermal insulation thickness for an office building in different climates by means of the basic and modified “cost-optimal” methodology , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[10]  V. Nik,et al.  Economic feasibility of building retrofitting mitigation potentials: Climate change uncertainties for Swedish cities , 2019, Applied Energy.

[11]  Mohammed F. Alsayed,et al.  Life cycle cost analysis for determining optimal insulation thickness in Palestinian buildings , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[12]  Lorenzo Pagliano,et al.  Identification of cost-optimal and NZEB refurbishment levels for representative climates and building typologies across Europe , 2018 .

[13]  Alexandra Troi,et al.  The “Cost Optimality” Approach for the Internal Insulation of Historic Buildings , 2017 .

[14]  Uniben Yao Ayikoe Tettey,et al.  Final energy savings and cost-effectiveness of deep energy renovation of a multi-storey residential building , 2017 .

[15]  Jan Hensen,et al.  A new methodology for investigating the cost-optimality of energy retrofitting a building category , 2015 .

[16]  F. Johnsson,et al.  Cost-effective retrofitting of Swedish residential buildings: effects of energy price developments and discount rates , 2015 .

[17]  Jan Akander,et al.  Comprehensive investigation on energy retrofits in eleven multi-family buildings in Sweden , 2014 .

[18]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Cost-optimum analysis of building fabric renovation in a Swedish multi-story residential building , 2014 .

[19]  Paris A. Fokaides,et al.  Legislation driven scenarios based on recent construction advancements towards the achievement of nearly zero energy dwellings in the southern European country of Cyprus , 2014 .

[20]  Targo Kalamees,et al.  Analysis of energy economic renovation for historic wooden apartment buildings in cold climates , 2014 .

[21]  G. Rombach,et al.  Raw material supply by aluminium recycling – Efficiency evaluation and long-term availability , 2013 .

[22]  F. Pardo-Bosch,et al.  Buildings , 1995, Data, Statistics, and Useful Numbers for Environmental Sustainability.

[23]  I. Freestone,et al.  Glass recycling , 2019, Recikliraj, ideje iz prošlosti.

[24]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Effects of energy efficiency measures in district-heated buildings on energy supply , 2018 .

[25]  Evangelos Grigoroudis,et al.  Towards a multi-objective optimization approach for improving energy efficiency in buildings , 2008 .