Quasi-optimum Efficiency in Output Voltage Hysteretic Control for a Buck Switching Converter with Wide Load Range

Successful on-chip integration of a buck switching power converter for battery-operated portable applications concurrently requires fulfilling stringent specifications, namely low silicon area occupancy, low relative output ripple, proper transient response whilst assuring high efficiency for a wide range of load currents. This latter key characteristic of high efficiency can be achieved not only by the power plant design but by the use of proper control methods. This work focuses in efficiency optimization of a buck converter suited to CMOS integration. Switching and conduction energy loss models are first discussed both for continuous and discontinuous conduction modes. Minimization of overall power losses yields an optimum law that continuously tunes the switching frequency as a function of load current. Being one of the simplest control methods applied to a buck converter the output voltage hysteretic control, the work then focuses in the implicit switching frequency tuning that results from the application of this control method and its impact on overall power efficiency. The paper contrasts the analytical models for the frequency variation, matched with system-level simulations, when including as non-idealities both output capacitor ESR and control delay. It is observed that for low output current values, the output voltage hysteretic control provides quasi-optimum power efficiency. Design criteria for matching both explicit optimum law and the law implicit in hysteretic control are provided, and a design procedure including output voltage ripple and capacitor value is discussed. Numerical examples throughout the paper consider a standard CMOS 0.35 mum technology. Experimental results for a low frequency prototype demonstrate the implicit switching frequency modulation of the output voltage hysteretic control

[1]  Jinwen Xiao,et al.  A 4/spl mu/A-quiescent-current dual-mode buck converter IC for cellular phone applications , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37519).

[2]  S. Narendra,et al.  A 480-MHz, multi-phase interleaved buck DC-DC converter with hysteretic control , 2004, 2004 IEEE 35th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37551).

[3]  Vivek De,et al.  Low-voltage-swing monolithic dc-dc conversion , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[4]  Robert W. Erickson,et al.  DC-DC converter design for battery-operated systems , 1995, Proceedings of PESC '95 - Power Electronics Specialist Conference.

[5]  Eduard Alarcón,et al.  Efficiency-oriented switching frequency tuning for a buck switching power converter , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[6]  Seth R. Sanders,et al.  Converter IC for Cellular Phone Applications , 2004 .

[7]  Robert W. Brodersen,et al.  A low-voltage CMOS DC-DC converter for a portable battery-operated system , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 Power Electronics Specialist Conference - PESC'94.

[8]  I. M. H. Babaa,et al.  Analytic solutions of limit cycles in a feedback-regulated converter system with hysteresis , 1968 .

[9]  Eduard Alarcón,et al.  Energy optimization of tapered buffers for CMOS on-chip switching power converters , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[10]  R. Miftakhutdinov,et al.  Analysis and optimization of synchronous buck converter at high slew-rate load current transients , 2000, 2000 IEEE 31st Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37018).