Depth Interpolation with Sparse Disparity Cues

The interpolation of stereoscopic depth given only sparse disparity information was investigated. The basic stimulus was a rectangle with zero disparity at one edge, and 20 or 30 min visual angle disparity at the other. The depth assigned to the ambiguous intervening locations was measured by means of a small briefly-flashed binocular comparison spot. For a stimulus consisting of a uniform rectangle presented on a background of random dots with zero disparity, interpolated depth was greater for a high mean contrast between rectangle and background than for a low mean contrast. Relative to a linear interpolation between the edges, a larger difference in edge disparity resulted in poorer depth interpolation. Depth interpolation based on rivalrous information was examined by filling the stimulus rectangle with narrow-band filtered noise which was uncorrelated between the two eyes. Four different passbands which were matched in apparent contrast were investigated. The results demonstrate that the rivalrous low-spatial-frequency content was resistant to interpolation; rivalrous high spatial frequencies did not interfere with depth interpolation. High-spatial-frequency stimuli yielded a percept similar to the uniform-field condition, whereas low-spatial-frequency stimuli lay in a depth plane near or even behind the background. In the latter case a transparent plane was perceived which was linearly interpolated between the two edges, and which floated above the rivalrous noise.

[1]  D. J. Sakrison,et al.  Structure and properties of a single channel in the human visual system , 1976, Vision Research.

[2]  W. Eric L. Grimson.  Surface consistency constraints in vision , 1983, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[3]  J. Mayhew,et al.  The Relationship between Apparent Depth and Disparity in Rivalrous-Texture Stereograms , 1978, Perception.

[4]  S Grossberg,et al.  Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional form, color, and brightness perception: II. Binocular theory , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Spatial Modulation Transfer in the Human Eye , 1967 .

[6]  DEPTH-PERCEPTION OF UNCORRELATED AREAS IN RANDOM-DOT STEREOGRAMS , 1985 .

[7]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  INTERACTION OF DIFFERENT MODULES IN DEPTH PERCEPTION. , 1987, ICCV 1987.

[8]  P A Howarth,et al.  Suprathreshold Stereo-Depth Matches as a Function of Contrast and Spatial Frequency , 1986, Perception.

[9]  C. Tyler,et al.  Depth from spatial frequency difference: An old kind of stereopsis? , 1979, Vision Research.

[10]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Multilevel computational processes for visual surface reconstruction , 1983, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[12]  G. J. Mitchison,et al.  The resolution of ambiguous stereoscopic matches by interpolation , 1987, Vision Research.

[13]  Randolph Blake,et al.  What causes stereoscopic tilt from spatial frequency disparity , 1987, Vision Research.

[14]  C. Blakemore,et al.  A new kind of stereoscopic vision. , 1970, Vision research.

[15]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Disjunctive eye movements , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  T. Collett.  Extrapolating and interpolating surfaces in depth , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  HIPS: A unix-based image processing system , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[18]  H. Wilson.  The significance of frequency gradients in binocular grating perception , 1976, Vision Research.

[19]  B. Julesz.  Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns , 1960 .

[20]  R. Blake,et al.  Depth without disparity in random-dot stereograms , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.