Electronic nose evaluation of onion headspace volatiles and bulb quality as affected by nitrogen, sulphur and soil type

Edaphic factors affect the quality of onions (Allium cepa). Two experiments were carried out in the field and glasshouse to investigate the effects of N (field: 0, 120 kg ha(-1); glasshouse: 0, 108 kg ha(-1)), S (field: 0, 20 kg ha(-1); glasshouse: 0, 4.35 kg ha(-1)) and soil type (clay, sandy loam) on onion quality. A conducting polymer sensor electronic nose (E-nose) was used to classify onion headspace volatiles. Relative changes in the E-nose sensor resistance ratio (%dR/R) were reduced following N and S fertilisation. A 2D Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the E-nose data sets accounted for c. 100% of the variations in onion headspace volatiles in both experiments. For the field experiment, E-nose data set clusters for headspace volatiles for no N-added onions overlapped (D-2 = 1.0) irrespective of S treatment. Headspace volatiles of N-fertilised onions for the glasshouse sandy loam also overlapped (D-2 = 1.1) irrespective of S treatment as compared with distinct separations among clusters for the clay soil. N fertilisation significantly (P < 0.01) reduced onion bulb pyruvic acid concentration (flavour) in both experiments. S fertilisation increased pyruvic acid concentration significantly (P < 0.01) in the glasshouse experiment, especially for the clay soil, but had no effect on pyruvic acid concentration in the field. N and S fertilisation significantly (P < 0.01) increased lachrymatory potency (pungency), but reduced total soluble solids (TSS) content in the field experiment. In the glasshouse experiment, N and S had no effect on TSS. TSS content was increased on the clay by 1.2-fold as compared with the sandy loam. Onion tissue N:water-soluble SO42- ratios of between five and eight were associated with greater %dR/R and pyruvic acid concentration values. N did not affect inner bulb tissue microbial load. In contrast, S fertilisation reduced inner bulb tissue microbial load by 80% in the field experiment and between 27% (sandy loam) and 92% (clay) in the glasshouse experiment. Overall, onion bulb quality discriminated by the E-nose responded to N, S and soil type treatments, and reflected their interactions. However, the conventional analytical and sensory measures of onion quality did not correlate with %dR/R.

[1]  Antonella Macagnano,et al.  Use of electronic nose and trained sensory panel in the evaluation of tomato quality , 2000 .

[2]  F. Castaigne,et al.  Modified atmosphere preservation of freshly prepared diced yellow onion , 1996 .

[3]  S. Schwimmer.  Enzymatic conversion of trans-(+)-S-1-propenyl-l-cysteine S-oxide to the bitter and odor-bearing components of onion , 1968 .

[4]  E. Block.  The Organosulfur Chemistry of the Genus Allium – Implications for the Organic Chemistry of Sulfur , 1992 .

[5]  E. Block,et al.  Allium chemistry: GC-MS analysis of thiosulfinates and related compounds from onion, leek, scallion, shallot, chive, and Chinese chive , 1992 .

[6]  M. Benady,et al.  Fruit ripeness determination by electronic sensing of aromatic volatiles , 1995 .

[7]  W. Randle.  Increasing Nitrogen Concentration in Hydroponic Solutions Affects Onion Flavor and Bulb Quality , 2000 .

[8]  J. Lancaster,et al.  The dynamics of the flavour precursors, the S-alk(en)yl-L-cysteine sulphoxides, during leaf blade and scale development in the onion (Allium cepa) , 1986 .

[9]  M. H. Littlejohn,et al.  Onion (Allium cepa L.) thiosulfinates respond to increasing sulfur fertility , 1994 .

[10]  M. Hawkesford,et al.  Elemental sulfur and thiol accumulation in tomato and defense against a fungal vascular pathogen. , 2002, Plant physiology.

[11]  D Schild,et al.  Bioelectronic noses: a status report. Part I. , 1998, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[12]  M Byers,et al.  Effects of nitrogen and sulphur fertilisers on the yield, N and S content, and amino acid composition of the grain of spring wheat. , 1979, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[13]  M. Kim,et al.  Alliinase‐independent Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus B33 by Heated Garlic , 2002 .

[14]  W. Randle,et al.  Streamlining onion pungency analyses , 1993 .

[15]  S. Schwimmer,et al.  Enzymatic development of pyruvic acid in onion as a measure of pungency , 1961 .

[16]  W. Randle.  Sulfur nutrition affects nonstructural water-soluble carbohydrates in onion germplasm , 1992 .

[17]  H. Mark,et al.  Qualitative near-infrared reflectance analysis using Mahalanobis distances , 1985 .

[18]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the S-alk(en)yl-L-cysteine sulphoxides in onion (Allium cepa L.) , 1983 .

[19]  K. Sutton,et al.  Quantifying onion flavor compounds responding to sulfur fertility: sulfur increases levels of alk(en)yl cysteine sulfoxides and biosynthetic intermediates. , 1995 .

[20]  G. Moates,et al.  Quantitative analysis of flavour precursors and pyruvate levels in different tissues and cultivars of onion (Allium cepa) , 1999 .

[21]  Paul Geladi,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 1987, Comprehensive Chemometrics.

[22]  W. Randle.  Onion Flavor Chemistry and Factors Influencing Flavor Intensity , 1997 .

[23]  P. Gemperline,et al.  A program for calculating Mahalanobis distances using principal component analysis , 1989 .

[24]  J. Aked,et al.  Discrimination amongst Alliums using an electronic nose , 2001 .

[25]  W. Randle,et al.  Pungency and Sugars of Short-day Onions as Affected by Sulfur Nutrition , 1993 .

[26]  J. Gardner,et al.  Electronic noses and their application in the food industry , 1997 .

[27]  J. S. Payne.  ELECTRONIC NOSE TECHNOLOGY : AN OVERVIEW OF CURRENT TECHNOLOGY AND COMMERCIAL AVAILABILITY , 1998 .

[28]  B. Hanson,et al.  Response of garlic to irrigation water , 2003 .