Neural Redundancy and Its Relation to Neural Reuse

Evidence of the pervasiveness of neural reuse in the human brain has forced a revision of the standard conception of modularity in the cognitive sciences. One persistent line of argument against such revision, however, cites the evidence of cognitive dissociations. While this article takes the dissociations seriously, it contends that the traditional modular account is not the best explanation. The key to the puzzle is neural redundancy. The article offers both a philosophical analysis of the relation between reuse and redundancy as well as a plausible solution to the problem of dissociations.

[1]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Methods for modular modelling: Additive factors and cognitive neuropsychology , 2011, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[2]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modular Processes in Mind and Brain , 2010 .

[3]  A. Iriki,et al.  Triadic (ecological, neural, cognitive) niche construction: a scenario of human brain evolution extrapolating tool use and language from the control of reaching actions , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Becoming an expert: Ontogeny of expertise as an example of neural reuse , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Nature and Language , 2002 .

[6]  D. Plaut Double dissociation without modularity: evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[7]  John Zerilli Multiple realization and the commensurability of taxonomies , 2017, Synthese.

[8]  L. Fadiga,et al.  Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Vincent Bergeron Anatomical and Functional Modularity in Cognitive Science: Shifting the Focus , 2007 .

[10]  Daniela Bonino,et al.  Increased BOLD Variability in the Parietal Cortex and Enhanced Parieto-Occipital Connectivity during Tactile Perception in Congenitally Blind Individuals , 2012, Neural plasticity.

[11]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  David Poeppel,et al.  Pure word deafness and the bilateral processing of the speech code , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  John Zerilli Against the “system” module , 2017 .

[14]  James M. Whitacre,et al.  Degeneracy: a link between evolvability, robustness and complexity in biological systems , 2009, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[15]  P. MacNeilage,et al.  The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Michael Siegal,et al.  Agrammatic but numerate. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Paul H. Mason,et al.  Degeneracy at Multiple Levels of Complexity , 2010 .

[18]  H. Barrett,et al.  Modularity in cognition: framing the debate. , 2006, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[20]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Modularity of music processing , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Amir Amedi,et al.  Visual Cortex Extrastriate Body-Selective Area Activation in Congenitally Blind People “Seeing” by Using Sounds , 2014, Current Biology.

[22]  L. Schauble,et al.  Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. , 1994 .

[23]  Nick Chater,et al.  Creating Language: Integrating Evolution, Acquisition, and Processing , 2016 .

[24]  K. H. Grobman,et al.  Degeneracy and redundancy in cognitive anatomy , 2003 .

[25]  Daniel C. Dennett,et al.  Multi-use and constraints from original use , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Victoria McGeer,et al.  Why neuroscience matters to cognitive neuropsychology , 2007, Synthese.

[28]  E. Kandel,et al.  The Brain and Behavior , 2005 .

[29]  Michael L. Anderson Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Beyond disjoint brain networks: Overlapping networks for cognition and emotion , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  G. Edelman,et al.  Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.