Morphometric comparison of the human corpus callosum in professional musicians and non-musicians by using in vivo magnetic resonance imaging.

The purpose of this study was to determine the possible morphometrical differences of the corpus callosum between professional musicians and non-musicians. Certain callosal dimensions and areas were measured in 20 professional musicians and compared with 20 age-, sex- and handedness-matched control group by using in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Sagittal T1-weighted midsagittal sections were traced with the digitizer and the metric scale of the system was used for the measurements. Results were statistically analysed by independent t test. There were significant differences between the two groups both for the anterior and posterior areas of the corpus callosum. Furthermore, significant differences between the two groups were found in the thicknesses of certain parts of the corpus callosum. Our results support the hypothesis that brain morphology is prone to plastic changes caused by environmental factors.

[1]  A Capdevila,et al.  When does human brain development end? Evidence of corpus callosum growth up to adulthood , 1993, Annals of neurology.

[2]  K. Yamashita,et al.  Development and aging of brain midline structures: assessment with MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[3]  E. Ross,et al.  Topography of the Human Corpus Callosum , 1985, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[4]  J. Juraska,et al.  Sex and environmental influences on the size and ultrastructure of the rat corpus callosum , 1988, Brain Research.

[5]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cognition and the corpus callosum: verbal fluency, visuospatial ability, and language lateralization related to midsagittal surface areas of callosal subregions. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  J. Staiger,et al.  Increased corpus callosum size in musicians , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  V. Swayze,et al.  Two Hemispheres—One Brain: Functions of the Corpus Callosum , 1987 .

[8]  Charles H. Goldsmith,et al.  The relationship of hand preference to anatomy of the corpus callosum in men , 1991, Brain Research.

[9]  G M Innocenti,et al.  Forms and measures of adult and developing human corpus callosum: Is there sexual dimorphism? , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  Andrew Kertesz,et al.  Cerebral dominance, sex, and callosal size inMRI , 1987, Neurology.

[11]  J. O’Kusky,et al.  The corpus callosum is larger with right‐hemisphere cerebral speech dominance , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[12]  M S Gazzaniga,et al.  No sex‐related differences in human corpus callosum based on magnetic resonance imagery , 1987, Annals of neurology.

[13]  W. S. Monkhouse,et al.  GRAY'S ANATOMY , 1947 .

[14]  V. Denenberg,et al.  Multiple dimensions of handedness and the human corpus callosurn , 1993, Neurology.

[15]  Victor H. Denenberg,et al.  Corpus callosum: region-specific effects of sex, early experience and age , 1988, Brain Research.

[16]  Y. Huang,et al.  Sex but no hand difference in the isthmus of the corpus callosum , 1992, Neurology.

[17]  R. Gorski,et al.  Sex differences in the corpus callosum of the living human being , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  G. Schlaug,et al.  In vivo evidence of structural brain asymmetry in musicians , 1995, Science.

[19]  A. Scheibel,et al.  Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum , 1992, Brain Research.

[20]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Anatomical left‐right asymmetry of language‐related temporal cortex is different in left‐ and right‐handers , 1991, Annals of neurology.

[21]  J. Régis,et al.  Effects of handedness and sex on the morphology of the corpus callosum: A study with brain magnetic resonance imaging , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[22]  R. Bleier,et al.  Variations in human corpus callosum do not predict gender: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.