Failure of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy to Regress after Surgery for Aortic Valve Stenosis

Background: Regression of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy usually follows surgery for aortic stenosis (AS); however, a significant number of ventricles remain hypertrophied. The extent of this phenomenon, the reasons for failure to regress, and its significance are unclear. Methods: We investigated 43 patients before and after aortic valve surgery and divided them into two groups: 30 patients with regression of LV hypertrophy (Group A) and 13 patients without regression (Group B). Preoperative echocardiographic measurements, clinical status, and operative factors were compared between the two groups. The patients were followed up for 42 ± 22 months for the occurrence of hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF) or death. Results: Preoperatively, the two groups were similar except for an excess of patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional Class IV and a greater incidence of old myocardial infarcts in Group B. Postoperatively, Group B patients had larger LVs with decreased systolic function. This was associated with a poor prognosis (23% mortality and 38% CHF vs 0% and 4% for Group A patients, P = 0.0002). Cox regression analysis showed previous myocardial infarction (P < 0.001) and percent mass reduction (P = 0.019) to be independent predictors of CHF or death. Conclusions: Successful regression of LV mass is difficult to predict before surgery; however, its absence is related strongly to a poor long‐term prognosis.

[1]  O. K. Hansen,et al.  Myocardial structure as a determinant of pre- and postoperative ventricular function and long-term prognosis after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. , 1998, European heart journal.

[2]  O. Hess,et al.  Normalization of diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis late after valve replacement. , 1995, Circulation.

[3]  L. Cohn,et al.  Aortic Valve Replacement in the Elderly Effect of Gender and Coronary Artery Disease on Operative Mortality , 1993, Circulation.

[4]  H. Waxman,et al.  Improvement in early diastolic filling dynamics after aortic valve replacement. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  H. Waxman,et al.  Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement measured by ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, American heart journal.

[6]  R. Whyte,et al.  Clinical and ultrasound results after aortic valve replacement: intermediate-term follow-up with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. , 1989, American heart journal.

[7]  O. Hess,et al.  Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. , 1988, Circulation.

[8]  P. Ducimetiere,et al.  [Operated aortic stenosis. Evaluation of the long-term prognosis using clinical and hemodynamic parameters in a series of 249 cases]. , 1979, Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux.

[9]  C. Rackley,et al.  Measurement of Left Ventricular Wall Thickness and Mass by Echocardiography , 1972, Circulation.

[10]  O. Lund Valve replacement for aortic stenosis: the curative potential of early operation. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Supplementum.