The benefits of argumentation are cross-culturally robust: The case of Japan

Abstract Thanks to the exchange of arguments, groups outperform individuals on some tasks, such as solving logical problems. However, these results stem from experiments conducted among Westerners and they could be due to cultural particularities such as tolerance of contradiction and approval of public debate. Other cultures, collectivistic cultures in particular, are said to frown on argumentation. Moreover, some influential intellectual movements, such as Confucianism, disapprove of argumentation. In two experiments, the hypothesis that Easterners might not share the benefits of argumentation was tested. In Experiment 1, Japanese participants had to solve a standard logical problem individually and then in groups. They performed significantly better in groups. In Experiment 2, Japanese participants had to estimate the weight of various animals. They did so individually, then after learning of another participant's estimates, then after discussing these estimates with the other participant, and then individually again. While the Japanese participants also benefitted from the discussion, these benefits were only visible when participants provided a final individual estimate. This delay is interpreted as reflecting the pressure to preserve social harmony that would have constrained Japanese participants to yield to their partner even when knowing that this did not improve the accuracy of their answer.

[1]  Albert Pilot,et al.  Cooperative learning vs Confucian heritage culture's collectivism: confrontation to reveal some cultural conflicts and mismatch , 2005 .

[2]  S. Bonaccio,et al.  Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences , 2006 .

[3]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Are There Cross-Cultural Differences in Reasoning? , 2006 .

[4]  David Moshman Molly Geil,et al.  Collaborative Reasoning: Evidence for Collective Rationality , 1998 .

[5]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  In-group bias and culture of collectivism* , 1998 .

[6]  S. Sugie.  Cooperative learning in Japan , 1995 .

[7]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[8]  M. Oaksford,et al.  Negations and natural sampling in data selection: Ecological versus heuristic explanations of matching bias , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[9]  C. B. Colby.  The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[10]  Emmanuel Trouche,et al.  Arguments, more than confidence, explain the good performance of reasoning groups. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  Erin Espelie,et al.  Two to Tango , 2019 .

[12]  H. Mercier.  On The universality of argumentative reasoning , 2011 .

[13]  A. Koriat,et al.  When Are Two Heads Better than One and Why? , 2012, Science.

[14]  H. Yama.  Matching versus optimal data selection in the Wason selection task , 2001 .

[15]  中村 元.  Ways of thinking of Eastern peoples : India, China, Tibet, Japan , 1964 .

[16]  N. Y. L. Lee.  Are There Cross-Cultural Differences in Reasoning ? , 2006 .

[17]  Milos Prazak.  Language and logic , 1972 .

[18]  C. Becker.  Reasons for the lack of argumentation and debate in the Far East , 1986 .

[19]  中村 元,et al.  The ways of thinking of Eastern peoples , 1960 .

[20]  Cooperative learning in latin America: A perspective from the alternative education experience , 1995 .

[21]  Rebecca A. Henry,et al.  Accuracy and confidence in group judgment , 1989 .

[22]  Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst,et al.  Do Easterners and Westerners Treat Contradiction Differently , 2013 .

[23]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[24]  Hiroshi Yama,et al.  Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning , 2015 .

[25]  Marek Fritzhand,et al.  Individualism or Collectivism , 1980 .

[26]  J. Dessalles,et al.  Arguing, reasoning, and the interpersonal (cultural) functions of human consciousness , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  H. Mercier,et al.  Is the Use of Averaging in Advice Taking Modulated by Culture? , 2012 .

[28]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  S. Heine,et al.  Psychological universals: what are they and how can we know? , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Katherine W. Phillips,et al.  Working harder with the out-group: The impact of social category diversity on motivation gains , 2007 .

[31]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  W. Doise.  The social development of the intellect , 1984 .

[33]  H. Markus,et al.  Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. , 1999 .

[34]  Y. Hirose,et al.  What the Japanese Language Tells Us about the Alleged Japanese Relational Self , 2005 .

[35]  Celia A. Brownell,et al.  Peers, Persuasion, and Piaget: Dyadic Interaction Between Conservers and Nonconservers. Developmental Program Report No. 44. , 1975 .

[36]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. , 1999 .

[37]  J. Needham,et al.  Language and logic , 1998 .

[38]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan , 1994 .

[39]  D. Medin,et al.  The native mind: biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. , 2004, Psychological review.

[40]  R. Branham.  Debate and Dissent in Late Tokugawa and Meiji Japan , 1994 .

[41]  Moyra Williams,et al.  New Horizons in Psychology , 1966, Mental Health.

[42]  Alain Trognon,et al.  How Does the Process of Interaction Work When Two Interlocutors Try to Resolve a Logical Problem , 1993 .

[43]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  Group decision making in hidden profile situations: dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Boris Maciejovsky,et al.  Collective induction without cooperation? Learning and knowledge transfer in cooperative groups and competitive auctions. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  H. Triandis.  The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[46]  L. Ross,et al.  Naïve realism and capturing the “wisdom of dyads” , 2012 .

[47]  E. Nussbaum.  Collaborative Discourse, Argumentation, and Learning: Preface and Literature Review. , 2008 .

[48]  George Wright,et al.  The impact of task characteristics on the performance of structured group forecasting techniques , 1996 .

[49]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[50]  Beom Jun Kim,et al.  Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  Cedric A. L. Taylor.  Cooperative learning in an African context , 1995 .

[53]  C. Sunstein.  The Law of Group Polarization , 1999, How Change Happens.