Using a choice experiment to measure the environmental costs of air pollution impacts in Seoul.

Air pollution, a by-product of economic growth, has been incurring extensive environmental costs in Seoul, Korea. Unfortunately, air pollution impacts are not treated as a commercial item, and thus it is difficult to measure the environmental costs arising from air pollution. There is an imminent need to find a way to measure air pollution impacts so that appropriate actions can be taken to control air pollution. Therefore, this study attempts to apply a choice experiment to quantifying the environmental costs of four air pollution impacts (mortality, morbidity, soiling damage, and poor visibility), using a specific case study of Seoul. We consider the trade-offs between price and attributes of air pollution impacts for selecting a preferred alternative and derive the marginal willingness to pay (WTP) estimate for each attribute. According to the results, the households' monthly WTP for a 10% reduction in the concentrations of major pollutants in Seoul was found to be approximately 5494 Korean won (USD 4.6) and the total annual WTP for the entire population of Seoul was about 203.4 billion Korean won (USD 169.5 million). This study is expected to provide policy-makers with useful information for evaluating and planning environmental policies relating specifically to air pollution.

[1]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[2]  David R. Hodas,et al.  Environmental Costs of Electricity , 1990 .

[3]  N. Hanley,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment , 1998 .

[4]  J. Louviere,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities , 1994 .

[5]  David A. Elston,et al.  An application of economic choice experiments to a traditional land use - deer hunting and landscape change in the Scottish highlands. , 1998 .

[6]  V. Brajer,et al.  Valuing Air Pollution Mortality in China's Cities , 2004 .

[7]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  Estimating Stated Preferences with Rated-Pair Data: Environmental, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programs , 1997 .

[8]  L. Anselin,et al.  Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach , 1998 .

[9]  P. Zarembka.  Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[10]  W. Watson,et al.  Air pollution: Household soiling and consumer welfare losses , 1982 .

[11]  Winston Harrington,et al.  Valuing Health Effects of Air Pollution in Developing Countries: The Case of Taiwan , 1997 .

[12]  S. Yoo,et al.  Measuring the Economic Benefits of the Ozone Pollution Control Policy in Seoul: Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey , 2001 .

[13]  M. Delucchi.  ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES OF MOTOR-VEHICLE USE IN THE US. IN: THE AUTOMOBILE , 2000 .

[14]  B. Baarsma,et al.  The Valuation of the IJmeer Nature Reserve using Conjoint Analysis , 2003 .

[15]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[16]  J. Shanteau,et al.  Livestock judges: How much information can an expert use? , 1978 .

[17]  Seung-Jun Kwak,et al.  A constructive approach to air-quality valuation in Korea , 2001 .

[18]  L. Lave,et al.  Air pollution, climate, and home heating: their effects on U.S. mortality rates. , 1972, American journal of public health.

[19]  Donald R. McCubbin,et al.  The health and visibility cost of air pollution: a comparison of estimation methods. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Guy Garrod,et al.  The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: A contingent ranking study , 1997 .