Myocardial Ischemic Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Dabigatran or Warfarin in the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) Trial

Background— There is a modest risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and myocardial ischemic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results— Data from the RE-LY study (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) were used to report rates of MI, unstable angina, cardiac arrest, and cardiac death and the prespecified net clinical benefit and treatment effects of dabigatran versus warfarin. MI occurred at annual rates of 0.82% and 0.81% with dabigatran 110 or 150 mg BID compared with 0.64% with warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96–1.75, P=0.09 for dabigatran 110 mg; HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.94–1.71, P=0.12 for dabigatran 150 mg). Annual rates of a composite of MI, unstable angina, cardiac arrest, and cardiac death were 3.16% per year with dabigatran 110 mg, 3.33% per year with dabigatran 150 mg, and 3.41% per year with warfarin (HR versus warfarin 0.93, 95% CI 0.80–1.06, P=0.28 for dabigatran 110 mg and HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.85–1.12, P=0.77 for dabigatran 150 mg). Events prespecified as “net clinical benefit” (all strokes, systemic embolism, MI, pulmonary embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death) occurred at a rate of 7.34% per year with dabigatran 110 mg, 7.11% per year with dabigatran 150 mg, and 7.91% per year with warfarin (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84–1.01, P=0.09 for dabigatran 110 mg and HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82–0.99, P=0.02 for dabigatran 150 mg). The relative effects of dabigatran versus warfarin on myocardial ischemic events were consistent in patients with or without a baseline history of MI or coronary artery disease. Conclusions— There was a nonsignificant increase in MI with dabigatran compared with warfarin, but other myocardial ischemic events were not increased. Treatment effects of dabigatran were consistent in patients at higher and lower risk of myocardial ischemic events. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT 00262600.

[1]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  Dabigatran vs. placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial. , 2011, European heart journal.

[2]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Newly identified events in the RE-LY trial. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Eikelboom,et al.  Update on Antithrombotic Therapy: New Anticoagulants , 2010, Circulation.

[4]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Rationale and design of RE-LY: randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy, warfarin, compared with dabigatran. , 2009, American heart journal.

[7]  S. Lévy,et al.  Comparison of idraparinux with vitamin K antagonists for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[8]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[9]  C. Francis,et al.  Ximelagatran vs low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: a randomized trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[10]  Palle Petersen,et al.  Ximelagatran vs warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[11]  S. Olsson,et al.  Stroke prevention with the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (SPORTIF III): randomised controlled trial , 2003, The Lancet.

[12]  W. Weaver,et al.  Oral ximelagatran for secondary prophylaxis after myocardial infarction: the ESTEEM randomised controlled trial , 2003, The Lancet.

[13]  H. Arnesen,et al.  Warfarin, aspirin, or both after myocardial infarction. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  P Smith,et al.  The effect of warfarin on mortality and reinfarction after myocardial infarction. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S. Shaughnessy,et al.  Do No Harm: Health Systems’ Duty to Promote Clinician Well-Being , 2022, American Journal of Hospital Medicine.