Spatial Coding in the Processing of Anaphor by Good and Poor Readers: Evidence from Eye Movement Analyses

An experiment that examined the way in which young readers deployed eye movements while reading sentences and while answering questions containing either a pronominal or noun anaphor is reported. To evaluate the possible causal role played by differences in inspection strategies between readers of above- and below-average reading skill, a third“age control” group of younger children was also tested. This group was matched on absolute reading ability with the less skilled group of older children, and on relative reading ability (i.e. reading quotient) with the more skilled group. Differences in inspection strategy were apparent between the groups of good and poor readers. Good readers launched more selective reinspections, whereas the poorer readers were more inclined to engage in“backtracking” and appeared to make less use of the displayed text. In every case there was a marked similarity in the behaviour of the good readers and the“age controls”. These results suggest that the ability to code the spatial location of words in a sentence, and, where necessary, to use this information to launch accurately targetted selective reinspections of previously read text, plays a crucial role in the development of skilled reading performance.

[1]  Peter Bryant,et al.  Children's Reading Problems , 1985 .

[2]  A F Monk,et al.  Theoretical Note: Coordinate Systems in Visual Word Recognition , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .

[4]  M Mason,et al.  Reading ability and the encoding of item and location information. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  The case for place: Text arrangement and reading skill , 1986 .

[6]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  M. Tinker,et al.  Recent studies of eye movements in reading. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Wayne S. Murray,et al.  Spatial Coordinates and Reading: Comments on Monk (1985) , 1987 .

[9]  M. Tinker,et al.  The study of eye movements in reading. , 1946, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Integrating visual information from successive fixations:Does trans-saccadic fusion exist? , 1983, Vision Research.

[11]  J. Backman,et al.  Reading level design: conceptual and methodological issues in reading research. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  P. Bryant,et al.  Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection , 1983, Nature.

[13]  K. Rayner,et al.  Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing , 1983 .

[14]  U. Goswami,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of the reading level design: A comment on Backman, Mamen, and Ferguson. , 1986 .

[15]  Wayne S. Murray,et al.  THE COMPONENTS OF READING TIME: EYE MOVEMENT PATTERNS OF GOOD AND POOR READERS , 1987 .

[16]  F. Richard Ferraro,et al.  READING WITH AND WITHOUT EYE MOVEMENTS , 1987 .

[17]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentences under three presentation conditions. , 1984 .

[18]  Allan Collins,et al.  Children's reading problems , 1979 .