Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data

A well established method for estimating the shape of the auditory filter is based on the measurement of the threshold of a sinusoidal signal in a notched-noise masker, as a function of notch width. To measure the asymmetry of the filter, the notch has to be placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically about the signal frequency. In previous work several simplifying assumptions and approximations were made in deriving auditory filter shapes from the data. In this paper we describe modifications to the fitting procedure which allow more accurate derivations. These include: 1) taking into account changes in filter bandwidth with centre frequency when allowing for the effects of off-frequency listening; 2) correcting for the non-flat frequency response of the earphone; 3) correcting for the transmission characteristics of the outer and middle ear; 4) limiting the amount by which the centre frequency of the filter can shift in order to maximise the signal-to-masker ratio. In many cases, these modifications result in only small changes to the derived filter shape. However, at very high and very low centre frequencies and for hearing-impaired subjects the differences can be substantial. It is also shown that filter shapes derived from data where the notch is always placed symmetrically about the signal frequency can be seriously in error when the underlying filter is markedly asymmetric. New formulae are suggested describing the variation of the auditory filter with frequency and level. The implication of the results for the calculation of excitation patterns are discussed and a modified procedure is proposed. The appendix list FORTRAN computer programs for deriving auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data and for calculating excitation patterns. The first program can readily be modified so as to derive auditory filter shapes from data obtained with other types of maskers, such as rippled noise.

[1]  D M Green,et al.  High-frequency audiometric assessment of a young adult population. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  D. D. Greenwood Critical Bandwidth and the Frequency Coordinates of the Basilar Membrane , 1961 .

[3]  B. Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  M C Killion,et al.  Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: where is the "missing 6 dB"? , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D L Weber,et al.  Growth of masking and the auditory filter. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  B C Moore Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[7]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  H Fastl,et al.  A free-field equalizer for TDH 39 earphones. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[11]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1987 .

[12]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shape. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  T. Houtgast Auditory-filter characteristics derived from direct-masking data and pulsation-threshold data with a rippled-noise masker. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  V. Nedzelnitsky,et al.  Sound pressures in the basal turn of the cat cochlea. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D R Soderquist,et al.  Physiological noise as a masker of low frequencies: the cardiac cycle. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  B. Moore,et al.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R. Patterson,et al.  Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands , 1961 .

[19]  A.R.D. Thornton,et al.  Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory , 1970 .

[20]  J. Pickles An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing , 1982 .

[21]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Analytical expressions for critical‐band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency , 1980 .

[22]  Peter Dallos,et al.  The Auditory Periphery Biophysics and Physiology , 1973 .

[23]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes at 8 and 10 kHz. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Input impedance of the cochlea in cat. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  D D Dirks,et al.  Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns , 1987, Hearing Research.