Efficacy of routine fetal ultrasound screening for congenital heart disease in normal pregnancy.

BACKGROUND Second trimester routine ultrasound evaluation of the fetal heart by means of the four-chamber view has been proposed for prenatal detection of cardiac anomalies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS A prospective follow-up study on 6922 scanned fetuses was performed. Pregnant women without known risk factors who were scheduled for a routine fetal ultrasound examination between 16 and 24 weeks gestation were invited to participate. Follow-up until 6 months postpartum was available for 5660 subjects (81.8%), of whom 5319 fulfilled all eligibility criteria. by comparing the prenatal diagnosis to the postnatal diagnosis, we obtained sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value (positive and negative). A total of 80 cases of congenital malformations were diagnosed during the study: 44 cases of congenital heart disease, 40 cases of noncardiac malformations, and a combination of the two in 4 cases. The fetal four chamber-view examination was considered abnormal in 7 women who were subsequently referred for extensive fetal ultrasound examination. Two proved to be carrying an affected fetus. Similarly, prenatal referral of 14 women because of suspected noncardiac malformations yielded 12 such cases. The fetal four chamber-view examination had a sensitivity of 4.5% (95% CI, 0.6% to 15%). Sensitivity for noncardiac anomalies was 30% (95% CI, 16.6% to 46.5%). Overall sensitivity of ultrasound examination was 16.3% (95% CI, 2.09% to 48.8%). Specificity and negative predictive value were high (>98%). The positive predictive value was low with wide CIs. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that the current mode of routine prenatal ultrasound screening for congenital malformations is inefficient, particularly for cardiac anomalies.

[1]  A. Fantel,et al.  Congenital heart disease among spontaneous abortuses and stillborn fetuses: prevalence and associations. , 1989, Teratology.

[2]  J. Nora Causes of congenital heart diseases: old and new modes, mechanisms, and models. , 1993, American heart journal.

[3]  J. Green,et al.  Fetal echocardiographic screening for congenital heart disease: the importance of the four-chamber view. , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  D. Grobbee,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease; prospects and problems. , 1995, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[5]  P. Ursell,et al.  Significance of cardiac defects in the developing fetus: a study of spontaneous abortuses. , 1985, Circulation.

[6]  U. Gembruch,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease , 1997, Prenatal diagnosis.

[7]  A. Garson,et al.  The Science and Practice of Pediatric Cardiology , 1998 .

[8]  Effect of Prenatal Ultrasound Screening on Perinatal Outcome , 1993 .

[9]  R. Goldstein,et al.  The AIUM/ACR antepartum obstetrical sonographic guidelines: expectations for detection of anomalies , 1993, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  C A Luck,et al.  Value of routine ultrasound scanning at 19 weeks: a four year study of 8849 deliveries. , 1992, BMJ.

[11]  O. J. Johansen,et al.  Prenatal detection of heart defects at the routine fetal examination at 18 weeks in a non‐selected population , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[12]  Waldo Emerson Nelson,et al.  Textbook of Pediatrics , 1969 .

[13]  M. Tynan,et al.  Prenatal screening for congenital heart disease. , 1986, British medical journal.

[14]  M. Campbell Incidence of cardiac malformations at birth and later, and neonatal mortality. , 1973, British heart journal.

[15]  J. Hegesh,et al.  Extended fetal echocardiographic examination for detecting cardiac malformations in low risk pregnancies. , 1992, BMJ.

[16]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Congenital heart disease: incidence and inheritance. , 1990, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[17]  P. Defoort,et al.  End‐result of routine ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies: The Belgian Multicentric Study 1984–92 , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[18]  A Billiet,et al.  Evaluation of routine ultrasound examination for the prenatal diagnosis of malformation. , 1989, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[19]  J. Wladimiroff,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis and management of congenital heart defect: significance of associated fetal anomalies and prenatal chromosome studies. , 1985, American journal of medical genetics.

[20]  M. Tynan,et al.  The natural history of the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. , 1989, International journal of cardiology.

[21]  M. Cullen,et al.  The frequency of aneuploidy in prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease: an indication for fetal karyotyping. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  S. Kivinen,et al.  Antenatal Detection of Congenital Malformations by Routine Ultrasonography , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  J. Nora,et al.  Congenital heart disease : causes and processes , 1984 .