The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Client (PCC) requests. Stateful PCE extensions allow stateful control of MPLS-TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs) using PCEP. The auto-bandwidth feature allows automatic and dynamic adjustment of the TE LSP bandwidth reservation based on the volume of traffic flowing through the LSP. This document describes PCEP extensions for auto-bandwidth adjustment when employing an active stateful PCE for both PCE-initiated and PCC-initiated LSPs. Stream: Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC: 8733 Category: Standards Track Published: February 2020 ISSN: 2070-1721 Authors: D. Dhody, Ed. Huawei Technologies R. Gandhi, Ed. Cisco Systems, Inc. U. Palle Individual Contributor R. Singh Individual Contributor L. Fang Expedia Group, Inc. Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at . https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8733 Dhody, et al. Standards Track Page 1 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents ( ) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info RFC 8733 Auto-Bandwidth with Stateful PCE February 2020 Dhody, et al. Standards Track Page 2 Table of
[1]
Xian Zhang,et al.
Applicability of a Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE)
,
2017,
RFC.
[2]
Scott O. Bradner,et al.
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
,
1997,
RFC.
[3]
Lou Berger,et al.
Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description
,
2003,
RFC.
[4]
Ina Minei,et al.
Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE
,
2017,
RFC.
[5]
Vijay Srinivasan,et al.
RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels
,
2001,
RFC.
[6]
Jean-Louis Le Roux,et al.
Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
,
2009,
RFC.
[7]
Thomas Narten,et al.
Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs
,
1998,
RFC.
[8]
Daniel King,et al.
Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Management Information Base (MIB) Module
,
2014,
RFC.
[9]
Peter Saint-Andre,et al.
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
,
2015,
RFC.
[10]
Óscar González de Dios,et al.
PCEPS: Usage of TLS to Provide a Secure Transport for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
,
2017,
RFC.
[11]
Barry Leiba,et al.
Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words
,
2017,
RFC.
[12]
Jeff Tantsura,et al.
A YANG Data Model for Path Computation Element Communications Protocol (PCEP)
,
2000
.
[13]
Ina Minei,et al.
Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for PCE-Initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model
,
2017,
RFC.