Building a Decision-Making Support Framework for Installing Solar Panels on Vertical Glazing Façades of the Building Based on the Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Benefit Analysis

Glazing is considered as a preferred solution for the buildability, aesthetic, and comfort of commercial buildings since glass cover can protect occupants from external environmental conditions, ensure the light transmission, and provide view and ventilation. At the same time, in the context of climate change and global warming, the use of renewable solar energy, such as solar and wind power, are encouraged to be utilized. Specifically, solar energy has become a renewable energy source that is clean and endless, at reasonable cost, to contribute to energy security as well as ensure sustainable development. Therefore, the study proposes a method for supporting the decision making in installing solar panels on vertical glazing facades of the building in the worst case that the remaining radiant energy from the sun was only transferred to the inside of the building. The Life Cycle Assessment and the Life Cycle Costing methodologies are applied to consider both environmental and economic aspects. The proposed method can (1) minimize the project cost (including initial investment cost and operation cost) during the building lifetime; (2) analyze the optimal budget to minimize the total life-cycle cost of the building over its lifespan and maximize the renewable energy generated from the sunlight entering buildings in different directions. The results show that with different initial investments, the investor will have a corresponding solution for choosing an optimal installation ratio for each type of glass combined with the installation ratio of solar panels on the facades to reach the optimal energy efficiency as well as environmental performance. This study is beneficial for investors in selecting energy-saving solutions in office buildings in the beginning phase of the project life cycle.

[1]  Mohamed Al-Hussein,et al.  Carbon Reduction Measures-Based LCA of Prefabricated Temporary Housing with Renewable Energy Systems , 2018 .

[2]  Joseph H.K. Lai,et al.  Building energy: a review on consumptions, policies, rating schemes and standards , 2019, Energy Procedia.

[3]  Dirk Jordan,et al.  Compendium of photovoltaic degradation rates , 2016 .

[4]  Hicham Johra,et al.  Solar shading control strategy for office buildings in cold climate , 2016 .

[5]  Vijay Devabhaktuni,et al.  Solar energy: Trends and enabling technologies , 2013 .

[6]  Jing Wu,et al.  Thermal performance evaluation of an active building integrated photovoltaic thermoelectric wall system , 2016 .

[7]  Chi-ming Lai,et al.  Solar façades: A review , 2015 .

[8]  Jing Wu,et al.  Dynamical simulation of building integrated photovoltaic thermoelectric wall system: Balancing calculation speed and accuracy , 2017 .

[9]  Xiaohua Xia,et al.  A multi-objective optimization model for the life-cycle cost analysis and retrofitting planning of buildings , 2014 .

[10]  Minh Quan Duong,et al.  Propose a MPPT Algorithm Based on Thevenin Equivalent Circuit for Improving Photovoltaic System Operation , 2020, Frontiers in Energy Research.

[11]  Rong Deng,et al.  A techno-economic review of silicon photovoltaic module recycling , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[12]  Joseph Khedari,et al.  Heat gain reduction by means of thermoelectric roof solar collector , 2005 .

[13]  Yupeng Wu,et al.  Smart windows—Dynamic control of building energy performance , 2017 .

[14]  Ling Zhang,et al.  Experimental evaluation of an active solar thermoelectric radiant wall system , 2015 .

[15]  Joseph H. K. Lai,et al.  Review on carbon emissions of commercial buildings , 2020 .

[16]  Xu Xu,et al.  Evaluation of an Active Building Envelope window-system , 2008 .

[17]  Jing Wu,et al.  Performance analysis of a self-adaptive building integrated photovoltaic thermoelectric wall system in hot summer and cold winter zone of China , 2017 .

[18]  Li Shao,et al.  A key review of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems , 2017 .

[19]  P. Hu,et al.  Experiment study on thermal performance of building integrated with double layers shape-stabilized phase change material wallboard , 2019, Energy.

[20]  Dolf Gielen,et al.  The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation , 2019, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[21]  Jing Wu,et al.  A comparative study on thermal performance evaluation of a new double skin façade system integrated with photovoltaic blinds , 2017 .

[22]  Bongju Jeong,et al.  Closed-Loop Supply Chain Planning Model for a Photovoltaic System Manufacturer with Internal and External Recycling , 2016 .

[23]  J. Lee,et al.  A Visible Light-Near-Infrared Dual-Band Smart Window with Internal Energy Storage , 2019, Joule.

[24]  Achille Messac,et al.  Optimization-based feasibility study of an active thermal insulator , 2012 .

[25]  Wangda Zuo,et al.  A comprehensive review of energy-related data for U.S. commercial buildings , 2019, Energy and Buildings.

[26]  An-Seop Choi,et al.  Evaluation of optimized PV power generation and electrical lighting energy savings from the PV blind-integrated daylight responsive dimming system using LED lighting , 2014 .

[27]  Ling Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of a prototype active solar thermoelectric radiant wall system in winter conditions , 2015 .

[28]  Concettina Marino,et al.  Does window-to-wall ratio have a significant effect on the energy consumption of buildings? A parametric analysis in Italian climate conditions , 2017 .

[29]  Ling Zhang,et al.  Review of solar thermoelectric cooling technologies for use in zero energy buildings , 2015 .

[30]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the blinds integrated photovoltaic modules , 2012 .

[31]  Xu Xu,et al.  Evaluation of a prototype active building envelope window-system , 2008 .

[32]  Shuying Yang,et al.  A Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Nonrenewable Energy and Greenhouse-Gas Emissions of a Village-Level Biomass Gasification Project in China , 2012 .

[33]  Tarek Zayed,et al.  Fuzzy-Based Life-Cycle Cost Model for Decision Making under Subjectivity , 2013 .

[34]  Samuel T. Ariaratnam,et al.  RISK-BASED LIFE-CYCLE COSTING OF INFRASTRUCTURE REHABILITATION AND CONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVES , 2003 .

[35]  Niccolò Aste,et al.  Glazing's techno-economic performance: A comparison of window features in office buildings in different climates , 2018 .

[36]  Karen Allacker,et al.  Sustainability assessment of energy saving measures: A multi-criteria approach for residential buildings retrofitting—A case study of the Spanish housing stock , 2016 .

[37]  Elisa Belloni,et al.  Evaluation of energy, thermal, and daylighting performance of solar control films for a case study in moderate climate , 2015 .

[38]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Environmental influence assessment of China’s multi-crystalline silicon (multi-Si) photovoltaic modules considering recycling process , 2017 .

[39]  Ergo Pikas,et al.  Facade design principles for nearly zero energy buildings in a cold climate , 2013 .

[40]  Roland Geyer,et al.  Photovoltaic waste assessment in Mexico , 2017 .

[41]  Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez,et al.  Multi-objective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment for retrofitting buildings , 2014 .

[42]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Producer Responsibility and Recycling Solar Photovoltaic Modules , 2010 .

[43]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  A personalized daylighting control approach to dynamically optimize visual satisfaction and lighting energy use , 2019, Energy and Buildings.

[44]  Florian Kraus,et al.  Green Roofs and Greenpass , 2019, Buildings.

[45]  Akash Kumar Shukla,et al.  Recent advancement in BIPV product technologies: A review , 2017 .

[46]  Jalel Sager,et al.  Energy Consumption and Energy-Related CO2 Emissions from China’s Petrochemical Industry Based on an Environmental Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment , 2017 .

[47]  Vanessa Valentin,et al.  An optimization framework for building energy retrofits decision-making , 2017 .

[48]  Jibran R. Khan,et al.  Solar power technologies for sustainable electricity generation – A review , 2016 .

[49]  Ling Zhang,et al.  Active building envelope systems toward renewable and sustainable energy , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[50]  Sandra Monteiro Silva,et al.  Environmental and cost life cycle analysis of the impact of using solar systems in energy renovation of Southern European single-family buildings , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[51]  David Arditi,et al.  Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) in Municipal Organizations , 1999 .

[52]  Jinqing Peng,et al.  Evaluation of potential benefits of solar photovoltaic shadings in Hong Kong , 2017 .

[53]  Hongxing Yang,et al.  Assessment of energy performance of semi-transparent PV insulating glass units using a validated simulation model , 2016 .

[54]  Francesco Bianchi,et al.  Thermal and lighting effects of an external venetian blind: Experimental analysis in a full scale test room , 2016 .

[55]  Ling Zhang,et al.  Coupled thermal-electrical-optical analysis of a photovoltaic-blind integrated glazing façade , 2018, Applied Energy.

[56]  Zeyu Wang,et al.  A review of artificial intelligence based building energy use prediction: Contrasting the capabilities of single and ensemble prediction models , 2017 .

[57]  A. Cannavale,et al.  Nano-encapsulation of phase change materials: From design to thermal performance, simulations and toxicological assessment , 2019, Energy and Buildings.

[58]  Ranko Goic,et al.  review of solar photovoltaic technologies , 2011 .