Energy and exergy efficiency comparison of horizontal and vertical axis wind turbines

In this paper, an energy and exergy analysis is performed on four different wind power systems, including both horizontal and vertical axis wind turbines. Significant variability in turbine designs and operating parameters are encompassed through the selection of systems. In particular, two airfoils (NACA 63(2)-215 and FX 63-137) commonly used in horizontal axis wind turbines are compared with two vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs). A Savonius design and Zephyr VAWT benefit from operational attributes in wind conditions that are unsuitable for airfoil type designs. This paper analyzes each system with respect to both the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The aerodynamic performance of each system is numerically analyzed by computational fluid dynamics software, FLUENT. A difference in first and second law efficiencies of between 50 and 53% is predicted for the airfoil systems, whereas 44–55% differences are predicted for the VAWT systems. Key design variables are analyzed and the predicted results are discussed. The exergetic efficiency of each wind turbine is studied for different geometries, design parameters and operating conditions. It is shown that the second law provides unique insight beyond a first law analysis, thereby providing a useful design tool for wind power development.

[1]  Michael S. Selig,et al.  Wind tunnel aerodynamic tests of six airfoils for use on small wind turbines , 2004 .

[2]  J. Rohatgi,et al.  Wind turbulence and atmospheric stability — Their effect on wind turbine output , 1999 .

[3]  John E. Fletcher,et al.  Development of small domestic wind turbine with scoop and prediction of its annual power output , 2008 .

[4]  Jack Zecher,et al.  A New Approach to an Accurate Wind Chill Factor. , 1999 .

[5]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of wind energy , 2006 .

[6]  Jens Nørkær Sørensen,et al.  3D boundary layer study on a rotating wind turbine blade , 2007 .

[7]  Arif Hepbasli,et al.  Exergetic and exergoeconomic aspects of wind energy systems in achieving sustainable development , 2011 .

[8]  Antonio Valero,et al.  Exergy Costs and Inefficiency Diagnosis of a Dual-Purpose Power and Desalination Plant , 2006 .

[9]  Hiroyuki Hirahara,et al.  Testing basic performance of a very small wind turbine designed for multi-purposes , 2005 .

[10]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Development of New Spatio-Temporal Wind Exergy Maps , 2006 .

[11]  Y. Çengel,et al.  Thermodynamics : An Engineering Approach , 1989 .

[12]  Rajat Gupta,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Overlap and Blockage Effects on Three-Bucket Savonius Rotors , 2007 .

[13]  R. E. Wilson,et al.  Aerodynamic performance of wind turbines. Final report , 1976 .

[14]  Kazumasa Ameku,et al.  Design of a 3 kW wind turbine generator with thin airfoil blades , 2008 .

[15]  Rajat Gupta,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF A THREE-BUCKET SAVONIUS ROTOR WITH A COMBINED THREE-BUCKET SAVONIUS–THREE-BLADED DARRIEUS ROTOR , 2008 .

[16]  Dorraine Diedrie-Ann Reid.  Environment & Sustainable Development , 2011 .

[17]  Greg F. Naterer,et al.  Entropy Based Design of Fuel Cells , 2006 .

[18]  Greg F. Naterer,et al.  Entropy‐based metric for component‐level energy management: application to diffuser performance , 2005 .

[19]  Badr Habeebullah,et al.  Exergy analysis of carryover leakage irreversibilities of a power plant regenerative air heater , 2004 .

[20]  David Wood,et al.  The starting behaviour of a small horizontal-axis wind turbine , 2001 .

[21]  Damodar Maity,et al.  Optimum design configuration of Savonius rotor through wind tunnel experiments , 2008 .