The Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics

Human crowd motion is mainly driven by self-organized processes based on local interactions among pedestrians. While most studies of crowd behaviour consider only interactions among isolated individuals, it turns out that up to 70% of people in a crowd are actually moving in groups, such as friends, couples, or families walking together. These groups constitute medium-scale aggregated structures and their impact on crowd dynamics is still largely unknown. In this work, we analyze the motion of approximately 1500 pedestrian groups under natural condition, and show that social interactions among group members generate typical group walking patterns that influence crowd dynamics. At low density, group members tend to walk side by side, forming a line perpendicular to the walking direction. As the density increases, however, the linear walking formation is bent forward, turning it into a V-like pattern. These spatial patterns can be well described by a model based on social communication between group members. We show that the V-like walking pattern facilitates social interactions within the group, but reduces the flow because of its “non-aerodynamic” shape. Therefore, when crowd density increases, the group organization results from a trade-off between walking faster and facilitating social exchange. These insights demonstrate that crowd dynamics is not only determined by physical constraints induced by other pedestrians and the environment, but also significantly by communicative, social interactions among individuals.

[1]  Frederick F. Stephan,et al.  The Distribution of Participation in Small Groups: An Exponential Approximation , 1952 .

[2]  John James,et al.  The Distribution of Free-Forming Small Group Size , 1953 .

[3]  John James,et al.  The Equilibrium Size Distribution of Freely-Forming Groups , 1961 .

[4]  A. Hare,et al.  Handbook of small group research , 1962 .

[5]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[6]  W J HORVATH A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF PARTICIPATION IN SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS. , 1965, Behavioral science.

[7]  A. Kendon Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[8]  P. Lissaman,et al.  Formation Flight of Birds , 1970, Science.

[9]  F. Heppner Avian Flight Formations , 1974 .

[10]  A. Aveni The not-so-lonely crowd: Friendship groups in collective behavior. , 1977 .

[11]  Hiroshi Tsukaguchi,et al.  A new method for evaluation of level of service in pedestrian facilities , 1987 .

[12]  Ulrich Weidmann,et al.  Transporttechnik der Fussgänger , 1992 .

[13]  W. J. Bell,et al.  Defining stops in search pathways , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[15]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Self-Organizing Pedestrian Movement , 2001 .

[16]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Controlled experiments to derive walking behaviour , 2002 .

[17]  P. Ball Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another , 2004 .

[18]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[19]  D. Sumpter The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  A. Seyfried,et al.  The fundamental diagram of pedestrian movement revisited , 2005, physics/0506170.

[21]  Lubos Buzna,et al.  Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[22]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[23]  M. Schreckenberg,et al.  Experimental study of pedestrian counterflow in a corridor , 2006, cond-mat/0609691.

[24]  M. Schreckenberg,et al.  Experimental study of pedestrian flow through a bottleneck , 2006, physics/0610077.

[25]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Discrete Choice Models for Pedestrian Walking Behavior , 2006 .

[26]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Specification of the Social Force Pedestrian Model by Evolutionary Adjustment to Video Tracking Data , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[28]  Wenjian Yu,et al.  Modeling crowd turbulence by many-particle simulations. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Experimental study of the behavioural mechanisms underlying self-organization in human crowds , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  J. Drury,et al.  Modelling subgroup behaviour in crowd dynamics DEM simulation , 2009 .