The phonetic realization of focus in West Frisian, Low Saxon, High German, and three varieties of Dutch

Abstract This study examines the effects of different kinds of focus and of focus constituent size on the phonetic realization of accent peaks in declarative sentences in varieties of continental West Germanic. Speakers were drawn from six populations along the coastal line of the Netherlands, covering Zeelandic Dutch, Hollandic Dutch, West Frisian, Dutch Low Saxon, German Low Saxon, and Northern High German. Our findings suggest that focus structure has systematic effects on segmental durations, the scaling and timing of the accentual f 0 gesture, and on the alignment of f 0 targets relative to the beginning of the accented syllable. However, the difference between neutral focus and corrective focus has more systematic effects than variation of the size of the focused constituents in corrective focus. In addition, speakers from different places were found to adopt different strategies in signaling these focus structures. Speakers of Hollandic Dutch and West Frisian expanded the pitch span on the accented word, whereas speakers of Low and High German rescaled single targets of the accentual f 0 gesture, and speakers of Zeelandic Dutch mixed both strategies.

[1]  W. Cooper,et al.  Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  W. Chafe.  Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[3]  W. Cooper,et al.  Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D. Ladd.  The structure of intonational meaning , 1978 .

[5]  Francis Nolan,et al.  Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[6]  Alice Turk,et al.  Acoustic segment durations in prosodic research: a practical guide , 2006 .

[7]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Types of focus in English , 2008 .

[8]  P. Gilles.  Regionale Prosodie im Deutschen Variabilität in der Intonation von Abschluss und Weiterweisung , 2008 .

[9]  Caroline Féry,et al.  Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[10]  Tone in Germanic : Comparing Limburgian with Swedish , 2004 .

[11]  S. Baumann,et al.  TONAL AND ARTICULATORY MARKING OF FOCUS IN GERMAN , 2007 .

[12]  Laurence White,et al.  Structural and dialectal effects on pitch peak alignment in two varieties of British English , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[13]  Martine Grice,et al.  Prosodic marking of focus domains - categorical or gradient? , 2006, Speech Prosody 2006.

[14]  K. Reinecke,et al.  Gilles, Peter: Regionale Prosodie im Deutschen. Variabilität in der Intonation von Abschluss und Weiterweisung , 2007 .

[15]  Mats Rooth.  A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[16]  Martha Dalton,et al.  Tonal Alignment in Irish Dialects , 2005, Language and speech.

[17]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Emphasis and tonal implementation in Standard Chinese , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[18]  Yi Xu,et al.  Closely related languages, different ways of realizing focus , 2009, INTERSPEECH.

[19]  A. D. Dominicis,et al.  Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages , 1999 .

[20]  Dwight L. Bolinger,et al.  Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse , 1989 .

[21]  J Vincent,et al.  What is the smallest prosodic domain , 1994 .

[22]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[23]  Yi Xu,et al.  Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[24]  P. Keating.  Phonological structure and phonetic form , 1995 .

[25]  Dmitry Sityaev,et al.  Phonetic and Phonological Correlates of Broad, Narrow and Contrastive Focus in English , 2003 .

[26]  Wilhelm Oppenrieder,et al.  FOKUS, MODUS UND DIE GROSSE ZAHL. ZUR INTONATORISCHEN INDIZIERUNG DES FOKUS IM DEUTSCHEN , 1989 .

[27]  W E Cooper,et al.  Acoustical Characteristics of Sentential Focus: Narrow vs. Broad and Single vs. Dual Focus Environments , 1986, Language and speech.

[28]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English , 1982 .

[29]  José Ignacio Hualde,et al.  Laboratory Phonology 9 , 2007 .

[30]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[31]  Kathryn Davidson,et al.  COMPARING METHODS FOR LOCATING PITCH "ELBOWS" , 2007 .

[32]  Frank Kügler,et al.  The role of duration as a phonetic correlate of focus , 2008, Speech Prosody 2008.

[33]  Yi Xu,et al.  Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0contours , 1999 .

[34]  Yiya Chen,et al.  Durational adjustment under corrective focus in Standard Chinese , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[35]  Susanne Uhmann.  On the Tonal Disambiguation of Focus Structures , 1991, J. Semant..

[36]  P. Boersma.  Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.05) , 2009 .

[37]  C. Gussenhoven,et al.  Prosodic effects of focus in Dutch declaratives , 2008, Speech Prosody 2008.

[38]  J. Verhoeven,et al.  Speech Rate in a Pluricentric Language: A Comparison Between Dutch in Belgium and the Netherlands , 2004, Language and speech.

[39]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  CONTRASTIVE FOCUS, GIVENNESS AND THE UNMARKED STATUS OF "DISCOURSE-NEW"* , 2008 .

[40]  J. 't Hart.  Intonation in Dutch , 1998 .

[41]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  On the phonetics and phonology of "segmental anchoring" of F0: evidence from German , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[42]  K. Stevens,et al.  Primary Features and Their Enhancement in Consonants , 1989 .

[43]  Association Focus , 1999 .

[44]  Sirpa Mäki,et al.  The computer program , 1980 .

[45]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[46]  John Kingston,et al.  Salient pitch cues in the perception of contrastive focus , 1994 .

[47]  Klaske van Leyden,et al.  Prosodic Characteristics of Orkney and Shetland Dialects: An Experimental Approach , 2004 .

[48]  J. D. Pijper,et al.  Modelling British English Intonation , 1998 .

[49]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Enhancement and Overlap in the Speech Chain , 2006 .

[50]  Frank Kügler,et al.  Production and Perception of Contrast in German , 2011, ICPhS.

[51]  K. Kiss.  Identificational focus versus information focus , 1998 .

[52]  E. Selkirk,et al.  Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in English , 2012 .