A field study with primary school children on perception of social presence and interactive behavior with a pet robot

This paper presents a study on (1) how children experience a pet robot, (2) how they play with it and (3) how children's perceptions on and interaction with pet robots are interrelated. The study features different types of subjective and objective techniques to assess the degree of perceived social entity from self-reports (i.e. questionnaires) and observed behavior. Three short questionnaires and an ad hoc code scheme of 15 low-level micro-behaviors were developed. 28 scholars aged 8 to 12 were observed at school during a play period with a Pleo robot and asked to answer the questionnaires. We found that the different questionnaire based methods were in line each other. Therefore, anyone of them can be used to measure the experience of a social entity. Play analyses showed that the two most prevalent behaviors were clearly social: petting the robot and showing it objects to engage in interaction. Moreover, children spent on average less than one per cent of the session time treating the robot as an artifact. However, significant covariation between the experience of a social entity and observed behavior could not be established.

[1]  Tom Chau,et al.  Movement-to-music computer technology: a developmental play experience for children with severe physical disabilities. , 2007, Occupational therapy international.

[2]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Socially Intelligent Agents: Creating Relationships With Computers And Robots , 2013 .

[3]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Therapeutic and educational objectives in robot assisted play for children with autism , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[4]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction , 2012 .

[5]  Faiz Ben Amar,et al.  Climbing and Walking Robots and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines , 2002 .

[6]  Diego Esteban Pardo Ayala,et al.  Building up child-robot relationship: from initial attraction towards long-term social engagement , 2011, HRI 2011.

[7]  Fumihide Tanaka,et al.  Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.

[9]  P. H. Kahn,et al.  Robotic Pets in Human Lives: Implications for the Human–Animal Bond and for Human Relationships with Personified Technologies , 2009 .

[10]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[11]  François Michaud,et al.  Perspectives on Mobile Robots as Tools for Child Development and Pediatric Rehabilitation , 2007, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[12]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  A case for low-dose robotics in autism therapy , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Cultural Differences in Attitudes Towards Robots , 2005 .

[14]  V. Evers,et al.  Observing conversational expressiveness of elderly users interacting with a robot and screen agent , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[15]  Sara Ljungblad,et al.  How do you play with a robotic toy animal?: a long-term study of Pleo , 2010, IDC.

[16]  Mattias Jacobsson,et al.  Play, belief and stories about robots: A case study of a pleo blogging community , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[17]  A. Gates,et al.  This is fun , 1945 .

[18]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Let robots do the talking , 2010, Int. J. Arts Technol..

[19]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  The comforting presence of relational agents , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[20]  Damien Brémaud,et al.  An alternative to external preference mapping based on consumer perceptive mapping , 2006 .

[21]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Robot therapy in a care house - its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[22]  H. Kwee,et al.  Adapting the control of the MANUS manipulator for persons with cerebral palsy: An exploratory study , 2002 .

[23]  Karola Pitsch,et al.  How infants perceive the toy robot Pleo. An exploratory case study on infant-robot-interaction , 2010, HRI 2010.

[24]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[25]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  The influence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people , 2008 .

[26]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction , 2003, CHI '03.

[27]  Marta Díaz,et al.  Building up child-robot relationship for therapeutic purposes: From initial attraction towards long-term social engagement , 2011, Face and Gesture 2011.

[28]  Sharon Creech,et al.  Love That Dog , 2001 .

[29]  Antonella D'Amico,et al.  New Frontiers for Psychology and Education: Robotics , 2004, Psychological reports.

[30]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  The Influence of Social Presence on Acceptance of an Assistive Social Robot and Screen Agent by Elderly Users , 2009 .

[31]  H. Wagner,et al.  Facial expression in the presence of friends and strangers , 1991 .

[32]  Aude Billard,et al.  Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[33]  H. Wagner,et al.  The Effect of Social Presence on the Facial and Verbal Expression of Emotion and the Interrelationships Among Emotion Components , 2002 .

[34]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[35]  Jacqueline L. Scott.  Children as Respondents: The Challenge for Quantitative Methods , 2008 .

[36]  Christopher G. Lewis.  The media equation: How people treat computers, televisions, and new media as real people and places , 1997 .

[37]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Perceptive sorting: a method for understanding responses to products , 2003, DPPI '03.

[38]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  “I Love This Dog”—Children’s Emotional Attachment to the Robotic Dog AIBO , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[39]  J. Barker,et al.  “Is it fun?” developing children centred research methods , 2003 .

[40]  R. V. Ham,et al.  ANTY: the development of an intelligent huggable robot for hospitalized children , 2006 .

[41]  Alexander Libin,et al.  Person-robot interactions from the robopsychologists' point of view: the robotic psychology and robotherapy approach , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[42]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[43]  Rhoda Weiss-Lambrou,et al.  An international content validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST) , 1999 .

[44]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Robotic Playmates: Analysing Interactive Competencies of Children with Autism Playing with a Mobile Robot , 2002 .