Insight on quantum dot infrared photodetectors

The paper presents possible future developments of quantum dot infrared photodetectors (QDIPs). At the beginning the fundamental properties of QDIPs are summarized. Next, investigations of the performance of QDIPs, as compared to other types of infrared photodetectors, are presented. Theoretical predictions indicate that only type II superlattice photodiodes and QDIPs are expected to compete with HgCdTe photodiodes. QDIPs theoretically have several advantages compared with QWIPs including the normal incidence response, lower dark current, higher operating temperature, higher responsivity and detectivity. The operating temperature for HgCdTe detectors is higher than for other types of photon detectors. Comparison of QDIP performance with HgCdTe detectors gives evidence that the QDIP is suitable for high operation temperature. It can be expected that an improvement in technology and design of QDIP detectors will make it possible to achieve both high sensitivity and fast response useful for practical application at room temperature focal plane arrays. However, so far the QDIP devices have not fully demonstrated their potential advantages.

[1]  Raphael Tsu,et al.  Superlattice and negative differential conductivity in semiconductors , 1970 .

[2]  S. Denbaars,et al.  Direct formation of quantum‐sized dots from uniform coherent islands of InGaAs on GaAs surfaces , 1993 .

[3]  Pallab Bhattacharya,et al.  Quantum-Dot Optoelectronic Devices , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Joe C. Campbell,et al.  Quantum-Dot Infrared Photodetectors , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  Jamie D. Phillips,et al.  Evaluation of the fundamental properties of quantum dot infrared detectors , 2002 .

[6]  S. Krishna Quantum dots-in-a-well infrared photodetectors , 2005 .

[7]  Cory Hill,et al.  Quantum Dot Based Infrared Focal Plane Arrays , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Wei Zhang,et al.  High-performance InAs quantum-dot infrared photodetectors grown on InP substrate operating at room temperature , 2007 .

[9]  P. Bhattacharya,et al.  Wavelength and polarization selective multi-band tunnelling quantum dot detectors , 2007 .

[10]  Magnus Willander,et al.  On the detectivity of quantum-dot infrared photodetectors , 2001 .

[11]  Antoni Rogalski,et al.  Quantum well photoconductors in infrared detector technology , 2003 .

[12]  Sikorski,et al.  Spectroscopy of electronic states in InSb quantum dots. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[13]  P. Bhattacharya,et al.  Far-infrared photoconductivity in self-organized InAs quantum dots , 1998 .

[14]  A. Rogalski,et al.  Assessment of quantum dot infrared photodetectors for high temperature operation , 2008 .

[15]  Christoph H. Grein,et al.  Theoretical performance of very long wavelength InAs/InxGa1−xSb superlattice based infrared detectors , 1994 .

[16]  H. Sakaki,et al.  Multidimensional quantum well laser and temperature dependence of its threshold current , 1982 .

[17]  Yozo Shimada,et al.  Bound-to-continuum intersubband photoconductivity of self-assembled InAs quantum dots in modulation-doped heterostructures , 1999 .

[18]  Magnus Willander,et al.  Device model for quantum dot infrared photodetectors and their dark-current characteristics , 2001 .

[19]  Darryl L. Smith,et al.  Proposal for strained type II superlattice infrared detectors , 1987 .

[20]  Antoni Rogalski,et al.  High-Operating-Temperature Infrared Photodetectors , 2007 .

[21]  Grambow,et al.  Nonlocal dynamic response and level crossings in quantum-dot structures. , 1990, Physical review letters.