Utility of Satellite and Aerial Images for Quantification of Canopy Cover and Infilling Rates of the Invasive Woody Species Honey Mesquite (Prosopis Glandulosa) on Rangeland

Woody plant encroachment into grasslands and rangelands is a world-wide phenomenon but detailed descriptions of changes in geographical distribution and infilling rates have not been well documented at large land scales. Remote sensing with either aerial or satellite images may provide a rapid means for accomplishing this task. Our objective was to compare the accuracy and utility of two types of images with contrasting spatial resolutions (1-m aerial and 30-m satellite) for classifying woody and herbaceous canopy cover and determining woody infilling rates in a large area of rangeland (800 km2) in north Texas that has been invaded by honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Accuracy assessment revealed that the overall accuracies for the classification of four land cover types (mesquite, grass, bare ground and other) were 94 and 87% with kappa coefficients of 0.89 and 0.77 for the 1-m and 30-m images, respectively. Over the entire area, the 30-m image over-estimated mesquite canopy cover by 9 percentage units (10 vs. 19%) and underestimated grass canopy cover by the same amount when compared to the 1-m image. The 30-m resolution image typically overestimated mesquite canopy cover within 225 4-ha sub-cells that contained a range of mesquite covers (1–70%) when compared to the 1-m image classification and was not suitable for quantifying infilling rates of this native invasive species. Documenting woody and non-woody canopy cover on large land areas is important for developing integrated, regional-scale management strategies for rangeland and grassland regions that have been invaded by woody plants.

[1]  Stuart E. Marsh,et al.  Feasibility of Invasive Grass Detection in a Desertscrub Community Using Hyperspectral Field Measurements and Landsat TM Imagery , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[2]  G. R E G O R,et al.  Net Changes in Regional Woody Vegetation Cover and Carbon Storage in Texas Drylands, 1937±1999 , 2022 .

[3]  O. V. Auken.  Shrub Invasions of North American Semiarid Grasslands , 2000 .

[4]  Herbicide effects on vegetation spatial patterns in a mesquite savanna. , 2003 .

[5]  D. Jones,et al.  Integrated Grazing and Prescribed Fire Restoration Strategies in a Mesquite Savanna: II. Fire Behavior and Mesquite Landscape Cover Responses , 2010 .

[6]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects? , 2001 .

[7]  Kirk W. Davies,et al.  Estimating Juniper Cover From National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Imagery and Evaluating Relationships Between Potential Cover and Environmental Variables , 2010 .

[8]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  Nutrient losses in runoff from grasslandand shrubland habitats in southern New Mexico: II. Field plots , 2000 .

[9]  R. James Ansley,et al.  Observation: long-term increases in mesquite canopy cover in a north Texas savanna. , 2001 .

[10]  Jack E. Norland,et al.  Relationships between Remotely Sensed Data and Biomass Components in a Big Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) Dominated Area in Yellowstone National Park , 2007 .

[11]  Wouter Dorigo,et al.  Mapping Bush Encroaching Species by Seasonal Differences in Hyperspectral Imagery , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[13]  Reetu Sharma,et al.  A comparative assessment of the ecological effects of Prosopis cineraria and P. juliflora on the soil of revegetated spaces , 1991, Vegetatio.

[14]  Sunil Kumar,et al.  Mapping Invasive Tamarisk (Tamarix): A Comparison of Single-Scene and Time-Series Analyses of Remotely Sensed Data , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Magaly Koch,et al.  Land-Cover Phenologies and Their Relation to Climatic Variables in an Anthropogenically Impacted Mediterranean Coastal Area , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[16]  B. Wilcox,et al.  Woody plant encroachment paradox: Rivers rebound as degraded grasslands convert to woodlands , 2009 .

[17]  S. Archer,et al.  TREES IN GRASSLANDS: BIOGEOCHEMICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WOODY PLANT EXPANSION , 2001 .

[18]  Delivered Biomass Costs of Honey Mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) for Bioenergy Uses in the South Central USA , 2012, BioEnergy Research.

[19]  Jane Southworth,et al.  Application of Object Based Classification and High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Savanna Ecosystem Analysis , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[20]  J. José,et al.  Carbon stocks and fluxes in a temporal scaling from a savanna to a semi-deciduous forest , 1998 .

[21]  W. E. Pinchak,et al.  Integrated Grazing and Prescribed Fire Restoration Strategies in a Mesquite Savanna: I. Vegetation Responses , 2010 .

[22]  R. Weih,et al.  Comparison of Pixel-based versus Object-based Land Use/Land Cover ClassificationMethodologies , 2009 .

[23]  W. E. Pinchak,et al.  Integrated Grazing and Prescribed Fire Restoration Strategies in a Mesquite Savanna: III. Ranch-Scale Cow–Calf Production Responses , 2010 .

[24]  Stephen Pike,et al.  Object-Based Image Analysis for Detection of Japanese Knotweed s.l. taxa (Polygonaceae) in Wales (UK) , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[25]  Paul V. Bolstad,et al.  Coordinating methodologies for scaling landcover classifications from site-specific to global: Steps toward validating global map products , 1999 .

[26]  M. Castellano,et al.  Structural biomass partitioning in regrowth and undisturbed mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa): implications for bioenergy uses , 2010 .

[27]  Linda Anderson,et al.  Mapping Mesquite (Prosopis) Distribution and Density Using Visual Aerial Surveys , 2007 .

[28]  M. Castellano,et al.  Strategies for Savanna Restoration in the Southern Great Plains: Effects of Fire and Herbicides , 2006 .

[29]  James H. Everitt,et al.  Evaluating Airborne Multispectral Digital Video to Differentiate Giant Salvinia from Other Features in Northeast Texas , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[30]  G. Asner,et al.  Woody plants in grasslands: post-encroachment stand dynamics. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  R. Ansley,et al.  Long-term grass yields following chemical control of honey mesquite , 1976 .

[32]  F. D. Pineda,et al.  Shrub encroachment in Argentinean savannas , 2003 .

[33]  R. Congalton.  A Quantitative Method to Test for Consistency and Correctness in Photointerpretation , 1983 .

[34]  Estimating Biophysical Characteristics of Musk Thistle (Carduus nutans) With Three Remote Sensing Instruments , 2006 .

[35]  D. Schimel,et al.  Mechanisms of shrubland expansion: land use, climate or CO2? , 1995 .

[36]  R. James Ansley,et al.  Comparison of Ground-Measured and Image-Classified Mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) Canopy Cover , 2012 .

[37]  Takeshi Motohka,et al.  Applicability of Green-Red Vegetation Index for Remote Sensing of Vegetation Phenology , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[38]  T. Fulbright.  Viewpoint: a theoretical basis for planning woody plant control to maintain species diversity. , 1996 .