Geophysics and Shallow Faults in Unconsolidated Sediments

This paper presents a case study using various geophysical techniques in unconsolidated sediments where shallow faulting is probable and most likely affects ground-water flow. Wenner and dipole-dipole resistivity, ground penetrating radar (GPR), and high resolution reflection seismic data are compared with cone penetrometer (CPT) information, existing monitoring well data and models of anticipated fault styles. The results of this study suggest that (1) the CPT study, combined with monitoring well data may suggest that discontinuities in corrrelatable zones indicate that faulting is present; (2) the addition of Wenner and dipole-dipole data may further suggest that offset zones exist in the shallow subsurface but make it difficult to map specific faults; (3) the high resolution seismic data will image faults to within a few meters of the surface but cannot identify faulting on the scale of our models; (4) offset 100 MHz and 200 MHz common mid-point (CMP) GPR will image features that may be fault planes and strands similar to the models; and (5) the combination of all the tools in this study, particularly the GPR and seismic, may allow for the mapping of small-scale, shallow faults in unconsolidated sediments that affect ground-water flow.

[1]  George A. McMechan,et al.  Acquisition and processing of wide-aperture ground-penetrating radar data , 1992 .

[2]  George A. McMechan,et al.  EXAMPLES OF REVERSE-TIME MIGRATION OF SINGLE-CHANNEL, GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR PROFILES , 1992 .

[3]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy , 1989 .

[4]  Don W. Steeples,et al.  High-resolution common-depth-point reflection profiling: Field acquisition parameter design , 1986 .

[5]  Paul B. Jones,et al.  Evidence for recurrent faulting in the New Madrid seismic zone from Mini-Sosie high-resolution reflection data , 1986 .

[6]  F. P. Haeni,et al.  Application of Ground‐Penetrating‐Radar Methods in Hydrogeologie Studies , 1991 .

[7]  A. Beck Physical Principles of Exploration Methods , 1981 .

[8]  J. Lienkaemper,et al.  Visibility of fault strands in exploratory trenches and timing of rupture events , 1990 .

[9]  J. Daniels,et al.  Seasonal Variations And Ground-Penetrating Radar Data Repeatability , 1991 .

[10]  Don W. Steeples,et al.  Identifying Intra-Alluvial and Bedrock Structures Shallower than 30 Meters Using Seismic Reflection Techniques , 1990 .

[11]  Evan K. Franseen,et al.  Vertical Resolution of a Seismic Survey in Stratigraphic Sequences less than 100 m Deep in Southeastern Kansas , 1995 .

[12]  A. Apparao,et al.  Depth Of Investigation In Direct Current Methods , 1971 .

[13]  R. F. Scott,et al.  Centrifuge modeling of fault propagation through alluvial soils , 1981 .

[14]  A. Crone,et al.  Style and Timing of Holocene Surface Faulting on the Meers Fault, Southwestern Oklahoma , 1990 .

[15]  Chris Hayward,et al.  Seismic reflection investigations of a bedrock surface buried under alluvium , 1992 .

[16]  D. Moffatt,et al.  A subsurface electromagnetic pulse radar , 1976 .

[17]  H. Jol,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar investigation of a Lake Bonneville deita, Provo level, Brigham City, Utah , 1992 .