A Theory of Friendly Boards

We analyze the consequences of the board's dual role as advisor as well as monitor of management. Given this dual role, the CEO faces a trade-off in disclosing information to the board: If he reveals his information, he receives better advice; however, an informed board will also monitor him more intensively. Since an independent board is a tougher monitor, the CEO may be reluctant to share information with it. Thus, management-friendly boards can be optimal. Using the insights from the model, we analyze the differences between sole and dual board systems. We highlight several policy implications of our analysis.

[1]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[2]  Stephen Gary Marks,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 2014 .

[3]  D. Yermack Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors , 1996 .

[4]  James S. Linck,et al.  What happens to CEOs after they retire? New evidence on career concerns, horizon problems, and CEO incentives , 1999 .

[5]  R. Radner The organization of decentralized information processing , 1993 .

[6]  Richard F. Vancil,et al.  Passing the Baton: Managing the Process of CEO Succession , 1987 .

[7]  S. Estrin,et al.  European boards of directors study , 1998 .

[8]  N. Vafeas Board meeting frequency and firm performance , 1999 .

[9]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Managerial Incentives and Capital Management , 1986 .

[10]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[11]  J. Morgan,et al.  A Model of Expertise , 1999 .

[12]  J. Tirole,et al.  Formal and Real Authority in Organizations , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  Marco Battaglini,et al.  Multiple Referrals and Multidimensional Cheap Talk , 2002 .

[14]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature , 2000 .

[15]  Canice Prendergast The Provision of Incentives in Firms , 1999 .

[16]  Denis Gromb,et al.  Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm , 1997 .

[17]  A. Demb,et al.  The corporate board: confronting the paradoxes. , 1992, Long range planning.

[18]  Gary B. Gorton,et al.  CAPITAL, LABOR, AND THE FIRM: A STUDY OF GERMAN CODETERMINATION , 2004 .

[19]  M. Weisbach Outside directors and CEO turnover , 1988 .

[20]  Joseph Farrell Meaning and Credibility in Cheap-Talk Games , 1993 .

[21]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEO , 1998 .

[22]  J. Sobel,et al.  STRATEGIC INFORMATION TRANSMISSION , 1982 .

[23]  A. Thakor,et al.  Information Control, Career Concerns and Corporate Governance , 2006 .

[24]  Rebecca N. Hann,et al.  Does the Market Value Financial Expertise on Audit Committees of Boards of Directors? , 2004 .

[25]  D. Scharfstein,et al.  Herd Behavior and Investment , 1990 .

[26]  Anil Shivdasani,et al.  Board composition, ownership structure, and hostile takeovers , 1993 .

[27]  D. Sheehan,et al.  Were the Good Old Days that Good? Changes in Managerial Stock Ownership Since the Great Depression , 1998 .

[28]  Anup Agrawal,et al.  Do Some Outside Directors Play a Political Role?* , 2001, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[29]  Charu G. Raheja,et al.  Determinants of Board Size and Composition: A Theory of Corporate Boards , 2005, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[30]  Jeffrey Zwiebel,et al.  Corporate Conservatism and Relative Compensation , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective , 1999 .

[32]  Dimitri Vayanos,et al.  The decentralization of information processing in the presence of interactions , 2003 .

[33]  April Klein,et al.  Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure1 , 1998, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[34]  W. Ocasio,et al.  Political Dynamics and the Circulation of Power: CEO Succession in U.S. Industrial Corporations, 1960-1990 , 1994 .

[35]  D. Yermack,et al.  CEO Involvement in the Selection of New Board Members: An Empirical Analysis , 1998 .

[36]  Lars Stole,et al.  Impetuous Youngsters and Jaded Old-Timers: Acquiring a Reputation for Learning , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[37]  David A. Jaeger,et al.  Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation when the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak , 1995 .

[38]  Ernst Maug Boards of directors and capital structure: Alternative forms of corporate restructuring , 1997 .

[39]  Lin Peng Learning with Information Capacity Constraints , 2005, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[40]  Seo-Hyun Oh Corporate governance in Asia A comparative perspective , 1999 .

[41]  Robert Gibbons,et al.  Optimal Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns: Theory and Evidence , 1992 .

[42]  S. Kaplan,et al.  The Value Maximizing Board , 1996 .

[43]  Randall Morck Behavioral Finance in Corporate Governance - Independent Directors and Non-Executive Chairs , 2004 .

[44]  Robert A. G. Monks Watching the watchers , 1996 .

[45]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences , 2003, Journal of Political Economy.

[46]  H. N. Butler,et al.  Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition , 1985 .

[47]  Modern Company and Capital Market Problems: Improving European Corporate Governance after Enron , 2003 .

[48]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications , 1981 .

[49]  Vincent A. Warther Board effectiveness and board dissent: A model of the board's relationship to management and shareholders , 1998 .

[50]  Andres Almazan,et al.  Entrenchment and Severance Pay in Optimal Governance Structures , 2003 .