Estimation of tiger densities in the tropical dry forests of Panna, Central India, using photographic capture–recapture sampling

Tropical dry-deciduous forests comprise more than 45% of the tiger ( Panthera tigris ) habitat in India. However, in the absence of rigorously derived estimates of ecological densities of tigers in dry forests, critical baseline data for managing tiger populations are lacking. In this study tiger densities were estimated using photographic capture–recapture sampling in the dry forests of Panna Tiger Reserve in Central India. Over a 45-day survey period, 60 camera trap sites were sampled in a well-protected part of the 542-km 2 reserve during 2002. A total sampling effort of 914 camera-trap-days yielded photo-captures of 11 individual tigers over 15 sampling occasions that effectively covered a 418-km 2 area. The closed capture–recapture model M h , which incorporates individual heterogeneity in capture probabilities, fitted these photographic capture history data well. The estimated capture probability/sample, $\hat{p} = 0.04$ , resulted in an estimated tiger population size and standard error ( $\hat{N}(S\hat{E}\hat{N}$ )) of 29 (9.65), and a density ( $\hat{D}(S\hat{E}\hat{D}$ )) of 6.94 (3.23) tigers/100 km 2 . The estimated tiger density matched predictions based on prey abundance. Our results suggest that, if managed appropriately, the available dry forest habitat in India has the potential to support a population size of about 9000 wild tigers.

[1]  James L. D. Smith The Role of Dispersal in Structuring the Chitwan Tiger Population , 1993 .

[2]  Margaret F. Kinnaird,et al.  Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape , 2003 .

[3]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES , 1998 .

[4]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Science deficiency in conservation practice: the monitoring of tiger populations in India , 2003 .

[5]  K. Burnham,et al.  Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals , 1978 .

[6]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Capture-recapture models. , 1992 .

[7]  Marc Kéry,et al.  ESTIMATION OF OCELOT DENSITY IN THE PANTANAL USING CAPTURE–RECAPTURE ANALYSIS OF CAMERA-TRAPPING DATA , 2003 .

[8]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals: a comment on misleading conclusions , 2002 .

[9]  J. Nichols,et al.  Tigers and their prey: Predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  K. U. Karanth,et al.  Behavioural correlates of predation by tiger (Panthera tigris), leopard (Panthera pardus) and dhole (Cuon alpinus) in Nagarahole, India , 2000 .

[11]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Evaluation of Two Density Estimators of Small Mammal Population Size , 1985 .

[12]  K. Karanth Tiger Ecology and Conservation in the Indian Subcontinent , 2003 .

[13]  M. Sunquist,et al.  The Social Organization of Tigers (Panthera Tigris) in Royal Chitawan National Park, Nepal , 1981 .

[14]  K. Ullas Karanth,et al.  Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models , 1995 .

[15]  David L. Smith,et al.  The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals , 2001, Animal Conservation.